The One-Answer Question Thread [closed]

[ThomasJE]

I learned from this:

You can also watch feliks "4x4 example solves if" you want more.

Thanks, I'll check that out later. I may also see some of Mats and Sebastien's reconstructions (I'm learning it for Yau, so seeing it used in Yau may be very useful.

 

[Schmidt]

You don't use 32223 in Yau, as you already have the cross solved, leaving just (max) 8 pairs.

Just reusing info.

 

[Ked Ki]

(I'm learning it for Yau, so seeing it used in Yau may be very useful.

I'd read Robert Yau's post on it: http://www.speedsolving.com/forum/s...method-(my-version)-examples-with-explanation

He's got several examples there. And Schmidt's technically right, you don't use 32223 in Yau, as you do only have 9 dedges to pair, but it tends to work very similarly to 32223.

 

[cubingawsumness]

I am aiming for sub 20 hopefully sometime soon and am wondering what my movecount for cross, F2L, and last layer should be, as well as the typical amount of time each step should take.

Thanks!

 

[mDiPalma]

I am aiming for sub 20 hopefully sometime soon and am wondering what my movecount for cross, F2L, and last layer should be, as well as the typical amount of time each step should take.

Thanks!

for sub 20, try 13 second f2l and 7 second LL. i dont know good fridrich movecounts. but 0 moves for f2l seems reasonable and 20 moves for LL seems around average.


YO I HAVE A QUESTION>>>

If we identify the fridrich method as "CFOP" then why does nobody identify the roux method as "FSCL"... pronounced "fiscal"?

and why can't ZZ (coll+epll) be called "EFCE"?

and don't u dare say "oh cuz like thars like 39 people who developed fridrich at teh same tiem so it r not fair and we cant credit all of them plox"

if we can describe one method with an abbreviation for the steps, we can describe all methods in the same manner very easily.

 

[PandaCuber]

f
YO I HAVE A QUESTION>>>

If we identify the fridrich method as "CFOP" then why does nobody identify the roux method as "FSCL"... pronounced "fiscal"?

and why can't ZZ (coll+epll) be called "EFCE"?

and don't u dare say "oh cuz like thars like 39 people who developed fridrich at teh same tiem so it r not fair and we cant credit all of them plox"

if we can describe one method with an abbreviation for the steps, we can describe all methods in the same manner very easily.

YO I MIGHT HAVE AN ANSWER>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Cause its easier to call things by its name, not abbreviations. It just happens to be that CFOP is pretty easy to spell out.
Then again, there are people that dont know all the algs, so technically they call it CF2O2P(For beginning cfopers) and it would just end up very complicated and not beginner friendly.
Final theory, just cuz.

 

[5BLD]

If we identify the fridrich method as "CFOP" then why does nobody identify the roux method as "FSCL"... pronounced "fiscal"?

and why can't ZZ (coll+epll) be called "EFCE"?

and don't u dare say "oh cuz like thars like 39 people who developed fridrich at teh same tiem so it r not fair and we cant credit all of them plox"

if we can describe one method with an abbreviation for the steps, we can describe all methods in the same manner very easily.

You can go ahead if you want to. But we don't want to. And we won't know what you're talking about.

And since you've already told us not to say (one of) the answer to your question, I personally have got nowehere to go.

 

[emolover]

How good is the "X-cube 7x7"?

 

[Michael Womack]

How good is the "X-cube 7x7"?

Just the same as all the other NON v-cube brand pillowed 7x7 and it's not the same brand as the x-cube 4x4

 

[robosariobo777]

Does anybody have any opinions on the QJ 1x3x3 Super Floppy Cube?

 

[ThomasJE]

Does anybody have any opinions on the QJ 1x3x3 Super Floppy Cube?

Try asking in the 'Puzzle Reviews' sub-forum.

 

[F2LOL]

is it possible to construct a functional 2x3x3 cube for f2l practice?

 

[mDiPalma]

is it possible to construct a functional 2x3x3 cube for f2l practice?

i'm not sure any 2x3x3 cube would be useful for f2l practice.

f2l as we know it will only exist as long as a 3rd+ movable layer(s) is available above.

 

[robosariobo777]

Try asking in the 'Puzzle Reviews' sub-forum.

Could somebody direct me there?

 

[F2LOL]

would a CFOP user use CFOP for Fewest Move and perhaps Blindfolded solves?

 

[Endgame]

would a CFOP user use CFOP for Fewest Move and perhaps Blindfolded solves?

if (s)he's lazy and doesn't really care about FMC or BLD then probably yes

 

[F2LOL]

whats preferred?

 

[brandbest1]

would a CFOP user use CFOP for Fewest Move and perhaps Blindfolded solves?

CFOP for BLD is going to take someone forever to memorize.

whats preferred?

FMC- Probably Petrus or intuitively, I'm not a huge FMC freak.
BLD- Old Pochmann and M2

 

[FinnGamer]

CFOP for BLD is going to take someone forever to memorize.




FMC- Probably Petrus or intuitively, I'm not a huge FMC freak.
BLD- Old Pochmann and M2

Isn't Heise the best FMC method?

 

[emolover]

Isn't Heise the best FMC method?

There is no such thing as a best method for FMC.