Status
Not open for further replies.
Hey, does anyone have a good zhanchi tensioning video? my zhanchi is a little off tension so i need help. thanks.

If it's off-tensioned you can take the cube apart, but leave the center pieces screwed into the core. Pull the centers away from the core and see which center piece is too loose/tight. When all 6 are equal you can reassemble, then +/- tensions with equal screwdriver turns on each center.
 
I'm teaching someone to solve a 3x3 using M2 and Old Pochmann. (with his eyes open) Then I'm planning on teaching him how to incorporate that into BLD solving once he learnes it well. Is this a good approach? Are there any disadvantages?

P.S. I'm just teaching him the modified y-perm, an r-perm, and the U' F2 U M2 U' F2 U parity algs.
 
@PC99:
I'm assuming he/she knows how to solve a 3x3 normally right? Or are you teaching him/her how to solve a 3x3 normally with a BLD method? If that's the case, I wouldn't recommend it since it's more confusing and boring compared to a more intuitive approach like LBL, so it's easier to lose interest and not move to BLD at all.

If he/she does know how to solve it already though and you're just teaching BLD, that approach is fine. The three steps I'd recommend for teaching BLD would be: Practicing with eyes open and looking at the cube; Writing down the letters/numbers/whatever you plan on using for memorization and solve without looking at the cube (just following what you wrote); Fully solving BLD.
 
@PC99:
I'm assuming he/she knows how to solve a 3x3 normally right? Or are you teaching him/her how to solve a 3x3 normally with a BLD method? If that's the case, I wouldn't recommend it since it's more confusing and boring compared to a more intuitive approach like LBL, so it's easier to lose interest and not move to BLD at all.

If he/she does know how to solve it already though and you're just teaching BLD, that approach is fine. The three steps I'd recommend for teaching BLD would be: Practicing with eyes open and looking at the cube; Writing down the letters/numbers/whatever you plan on using for memorization and solve without looking at the cube (just following what you wrote); Fully solving BLD.

He doesn't know how to solve it yet. I'm teaching him how to with his eyes open. I feel like it is pretty intuitive with setup moves and such for M2. And even the setup moves for Old Pochmann are intuitive. I think it is easier to learn than LBL. At least algorithm wise.
 
I'll try it. I was thinking of a tutorial written down, but I did learn OLL and PLL from badmephisto's site.
 
I see, tenkiu Jian Han. I looked through it, and it's more like CO > EO > CP > EP. But if even Bingliang Li uses this method, then how does he perform parity so fast? :O and how do the fast people 'predict' when parity is coming?

CP parity. Solve CP and fix parity in one alg, by checking the PLL of both layers. It's only an extra set of CP algs so it's not a lot to learn, and it cuts the number of 1look EPs by a lot
 
Is that you in your avatar?
Knowing these people...yeah.

Geez I now know that you haven't even checked my YouTube channel.

Ha no! I would be getting so much ass if that was me!

This is me!

DSC00029.jpg
I am going to aim for something like that eventually.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top