Full EG is so not a waste

The reason I asked is cuz I have one more EG-2 set to go and i'm done.
congrats.

DDD that is quite an accomplishment. how good is your recog and response time? because that is where it matters. lol
im barely halfway through CLL, decided to stop and work on my recog before i went on lol. now im working on OLL.
Is there anywhere with a video tutorial on the 3-2-2-2-3 edge pairing method for the 4x4
I think nakaji has one on youtube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IGiUus5I8BQ
its in japanese, but if you can follow what he is doing, it makes sense.
the video itself is 3-3-3-3 or 3-6-3 which ever you what to call it. but it can be adapted into 3-2-2-2-3
if you still need help, i have a pretty good understanding of it, and can make a video tutorial if its needed.
Im just not fast at it. yet. lol
Would you stop pretending like you know things that you really know nothing about?
umm, rude much.
I meant that eg-2 is easily turned into CLL with R2 F2 R2.
and i dont pretend to know things, if i dont know the answer, i either dont answer or i look it up.
and Rowe, one of the fastest 2x2 cubers in the world, said that full EG isnt necessary.
there are two short algs that turn eg-1 or eg2 into CLL and both algs are fast. and he uses both of them. I actually got them from him.
If i remember correctly he uses full CLL and partial EG1, though this was a while back, so he could have advanced.
EG-1 - R' F R2 U' R2 F R
EG-2 - R2/L2 F2/B2 R2/L2
speaking of algorithms, does anyone know who knows the most?