The One-Answer Question Thread [closed]

[timeless]

Bump

here

"If your willing to take it over please email me at [email protected] with an offer. "

Direct quote from the front page of that website. ;_;

 

[thackernerd]

I emailed him about a month ago and he hasn't answered.

 

[Julian]

What is the best way to solve this case (GO pair)?

Either
d2 R2 u R2 u' R2
or
Sexy R U R' U L U L'

 

[Raiz]

I want my zanchi to have the 45 degree corner cutting. But i cant get it to that tension. would that tension be a loose one or a tight one?

 

[EricReese]

In Julians post, I always do the 2nd one. Always

 

[gundamslicer]

I want my zanchi to have the 45 degree corner cutting. But i cant get it to that tension. would that tension be a loose one or a tight one?

5-6 loosening rotations for a good loose cornercutting tension from max tension

 

[Godmil]

What is the best way to solve this case (GO pair)?

I'd do U2 L2 u' L2 u L2
But I suck at F2L.

 

[chrissyD]

You promise? =[]

yea of course they take some time to learn but in the end its worth it. I also didn't want to learn loads of algs but i just sucked it up and learned them and i found out they're not that hard to learn

 

[Dacuba]

Wanna begin practise 2x2x2 more, but I only use the Fridrich-like method

So what is good to begin? I mostly don't know to chose either Guimond or just use CLLs. What would you recommend?

 

[Selkie]

What is the best way to solve this case (GO pair)?

for that case I would use RUR'U' RUR'U LUL' and variations of that if that pair was going to FL or FR. But if the pair was going to BR I would use U R'FRF' R'U'R

Wanna begin practise 2x2x2 more, but I only use the Fridrich-like method

So what is good to begin? I mostly don't know to chose either Guimond or just use CLLs. What would you recommend?

Ortega is a good method to move to after beginner. Very few algorithms and you can get some good improvement on speed.

 

[Dacuba]

Ortega is a good method to move to after beginner. Very few algorithms and you can get some good improvement on speed.

I've already played around with Ortega, and I am willing to learn more algorithms/learn a more advanced method. So there I found Guimond and CLLs. EG is really too much to learn

So what would you chose between them? Does it make sense to combine methodes depending on the scramble?

Oh and thank you for your answer of course

 

[Selkie]

Ahh my apologies, then your answer is best supplied by someone with a little more 2x2 knowledge. Its something I seldom practice so Ortega suits me

 

[ilikecubing]

Lubix for lunhui.Good choice?

 

[Selkie]

Lubix for lunhui.Good choice?

I certainly use it in all my Dayans on the core. I use a thinner viscosity shock oil for the internal mech.

EDIT: Unless you were buying the cube itself from them. Again good choice. I have one of their Guhong ultimates as well and you will get a good assembled, lubed and tentioned cube.

 

[hic0057]

Does anyone knows how to solve a lanlan 8 axis octahedron.

http://www.lightake.com/detail.do/sku.LL_8_Axis_Octahedron_Magic_Cube_Black-32676

I've tried keyholing, corner last, LBL but the furthest I have got with this puzzle is 2 out of 8 sides.

 

[RyanReese09]

Learn commutators.

 

[hic0057]

Doesn't work well with this puzzle.

 

[RyanReese09]

Yes it does.

 

[hic0057]

I just been trying coms and I can't even get a layer done. Is there any tutorials out there for it because coms are too difficult for this puzzle.

 

[da25centz]

I've already played around with Ortega, and I am willing to learn more algorithms/learn a more advanced method. So there I found Guimond and CLLs. EG is really too much to learn

So what would you chose between them? Does it make sense to combine methodes depending on the scramble?

Oh and thank you for your answer of course

I would learn guimond first, because the PBL algs you learned for ortega are used in guimond