The One-Answer Question Thread [closed]

[vcuber13]

What would fit best on a Haiyan/AV, Small cubesmith 3x3x3 stickers or normal ones?

Bringing my question back to life.

I have normal ones, but you have to put them on very carefully, there starting to chip

 

[Deleted member 2864]

What would fit best on a Haiyan/AV, Small cubesmith 3x3x3 stickers or normal ones?

Bringing my question back to life.

I have normal ones, but you have to put them on very carefully, there starting to chip

Small ones it is then I'm afraid they'll look tiny on the edge pieces though.

 

[vcuber13]

What would fit best on a Haiyan/AV, Small cubesmith 3x3x3 stickers or normal ones?

Bringing my question back to life.

I have normal ones, but you have to put them on very carefully, there starting to chip

Small ones it is then I'm afraid they'll look tiny on the edge pieces though.

You could always buy both and deside.

 

[Erdos]

I imagine that ZB has enormous potential, and taking away the task of memorizing all 492 algos or whatever, the recognition time would seem to take a lot more practice. Unless the recognition time is extremely quick, I don't see how it could beat a person who completes the OLL as you recognize it and then completes the PLL as you apply it. I might see this method be used more in the future, when cubing may become more competitive and people spend more time on it. This would require people to continue learning hundreds of more algos after learning full Fridrich, and then I could imagine someone learning more algos beyond ZB.
I'm only a beginner though, so I don't know much about the potential of reducing the recognition time. It seems really interesting though, and I'd love to try it 2-3 years from now if I'm still interested in cubing and if I learned the full Fridrich. Ten years from now, I just don't see the Fridrich method remaining dominant.

 

[Kirjava]

Ten years from now, I just don't see the Fridrich method remaining dominant.

Maybe not as much as it is now, but I still think the majority will use it.

There are people who are convinced that roux will become the dominant method. These people are deluded. There will always be a divide, and there are those people who don't like M moves, favouring CFOP for the majority, or new method X.

 

[ben1996123]

What is the difference between moderator, super moderator, and administrator? What can each do that the others cant?

 

[ottothedog]

What would fit best on a Haiyan/AV, Small cubesmith 3x3x3 stickers or normal ones?

Bringing my question back to life.

I have normal ones, but you have to put them on very carefully, there starting to chip

Small ones it is then I'm afraid they'll look tiny on the edge pieces though.

You could always buy both and deside.

weston did this on his haiyan cube and it made the cube look like it was smaller than it actually was, i would advice that you spend the extra $2 and just get both and maybe try a combination of the two

 

[ThatGuy]

Is there a set of algs(name?) that permutes and orients the LL edges without messing up the corners? Or is it impractical? How would I create these algs myself?

 

[jiggy]

This sounds to me like ELL. I'm far from an expert but this may help you: http://www.speedsolving.com/wiki/index.php/ELL.

 

[Novriil]

Is there a set of algs(name?) that permutes and orients the LL edges without messing up the corners? Or is it impractical? How would I create these algs myself?

To create those algs you can use CubeExplorer

 

[miniGOINGS]

Maybe not as much as it is now, but I still think the majority will use it.

There are people who are convinced that roux will become the dominant method. These people are deluded. There will always be a divide, and there are those people who don't like M moves, favouring CFOP for the majority, or new method X.

I still think that soon a new method will overtake Fridrich.

 

[CuBeOrDiE]

Maybe not as much as it is now, but I still think the majority will use it.

There are people who are convinced that roux will become the dominant method. These people are deluded. There will always be a divide, and there are those people who don't like M moves, favouring CFOP for the majority, or new method X.

I still think that soon a new method will overtake Fridrich.

Possibly, but I think that such a method will have its roots in Fridrich.

 

[4Chan]

Erdos: lol.

I remember back in the day (yahoo speedcubing group) when ZB was hyped. Then it died down.

My bet is on ZZ.

 

[CuBeOrDiE]

My bet is on ZZ.

ZZ is not exactly a "method", it just adds an extra step in the beginning.

 

[koreancuber]

My bet is on ZZ.

ZZ is not exactly a "method", it just adds an extra step in the beginning.

so it IS a method of solving the cube.

 

[CuBeOrDiE]

I said "method" not method. Technicly, it is a method, but really it isn't, because there are so many ways to solve each step. When doing F2L after EO line, for example, you could use a Fridrich aproach, more of a roux or petrus approuch, etc.

 

[Feryll]

Whatever the new method, it's not going to be what the OP was thinking of.

 

[4Chan]

Lmao, you're a noob.
You contradict yourself.

Have you forgotten your "method"?
Try to remember how fail that was.

ZZ is a method.
It is completely different from CFOP.

 

[CuBeOrDiE]

Lmao, you're a noob.
You contradict yourself.

Have you forgotten your "method"?
Try to remember how fail that was.

ZZ is a method.
It is completely different from CFOP.

im not a noob, i have short term memory loss
edit: ZZ can be similar to fridrich. the only really defined step is the EO line, from then, there isn't too much method

 

[Cride5]

My bet is on ZZ.

ZZ is not exactly a "method", it just adds an extra step in the beginning.

If you do ZZ F2L like Fridrich, then you're not doing ZZ F2L. If you do it like Petrus, then you're not doing ZZ F2L. The 'ZZ method' also has its own unique LL method. It's called ZZLL.

Please do not make assertions about things you know nothing about!