The One-Answer Question Thread [closed]

[Cyrus C.]

CLL's all have the same probability, right?

 

[jiggy]

Whats a good one handed H-perm?

R2 U2 R2 U2 R2 U' R2 U2 R2 U2 R2 U?

Oh ya! I forgot about that, what about Z-perm though?

I like (R U R' U) (R' U' R' U) (R U' R' U') R2 U R

 

[miniGOINGS]

Whats a good one handed H-perm?

R2 U2 R2 U2 R2 U' R2 U2 R2 U2 R2 U?

R2 U2 R U2 R2 U2 R2 U2 R U2 R2

 

[Deleted member 4527]

Whats a good one handed H-perm?

R2 U2 R2 U2 R2 U' R2 U2 R2 U2 R2 U?

I use Takafumi's H Perm, R2 U2 R U2 R2 U2 R2 U2 R U2 R2

Edit: ninja'd

 

[Cyrus C.]

Whats a good one handed H-perm?

No one has mentioned this awesome one. R2 U2 R' U2 R2 U2 R2 U2 R' U2 R2.

 

[vcuber13]

Whats the math coding to make something like this:

3
5

I know you do \( ... [(slash)math], but how do you do something over something? \)

 

[Cyrus C.]

\( 3/5 \)

Write it 3/5?

 

[vcuber13]

\( 3/5 \)

I know but can you do it over, like if you have something like:

\( 3x^2*(7/y^6)+n!/(-x^3)^y \)

Also wasn't there a thread about it, becuase i couldn't find it.

 

[4Chan]

I know but can you do it over, like if you have something like:

\( 3x^2*7y^-6+n!/(-x^3)^y \)

Also wasn't there a thread about it, becuase i couldn't find it.

Did I get your function right?

 

[vcuber13]

I know but can you do it over, like if you have something like:

\( 3x^2*(7/y^6)+n!/(-x^3)^y \)

Also wasn't there a thread about it, becuase i couldn't find it.

Did I get your function right?

Basically but, when I put in 7y^-6, it came out as 7(y^-)6

 

[4Chan]

Darn, I was wrong. >.o
What I did was wolframalpha + screenshot + upload to photobucket.

 

[vcuber13]

Darn, I was wrong. >.o
What I did was wolframalpha + screenshot + upload to photobucket.

Its not that you were wrong it came up wrong on here.

Also, wasn't there a thread about it or am I wrong?

 

[dillonbladez]

yep, its one of the newest functions, i think.

 

[blakedacuber]

what brand is this >>>> http://www.popbuying.com/detail.pb/sku.4x4x4_Magic_Cube_4d_White_(Box_Package)-28301

 

[Deleted member 4527]

\( \frac{3}{5} \)

\frac{3}{5}

Spoiler

learn latex

 

[vcuber13]

\( \frac{3}{5} \)

\frac{3}{5}

Spoiler

learn latex

Thanks, now I can do this:

\( \frac{9\pi}{7}\approx\left[\frac{3x^2\times7y^{-6}+(\Sigma\times{\pi})!}{(-x^3)^y}\right]^{\sqrt2} \)

 

[Googlrr]

Hello one answer question thread, I hope you can help.

See, I just got my square-1, and I want to solve it myself. My goal is to not look at any help other than what I've seen previously (i.e. solving videos). I was wondering if I'm going in the right direction.

The way I see it, is to get the square-1 back into a cube, then solve it kinda LBL style. I don't think making the bottom layer will be too difficult, but I'm not that far yet. My other thought was to do the corners first, then the edges.

So I guess what I'm asking, is if this is the general approach. Also, is there parity that I might come across where I most likely couldn't figure out myself? I mean I'm not the best puzzle solver, I just want to have some sense of accomplishment. So far I'm having trouble getting it to cubeshape, I've been playing with it about an hour with little progress.

 

[Deleted member 4527]

Hello one answer question thread, I hope you can help.

See, I just got my square-1, and I want to solve it myself. My goal is to not look at any help other than what I've seen previously (i.e. solving videos). I was wondering if I'm going in the right direction.

The way I see it, is to get the square-1 back into a cube, then solve it kinda LBL style. I don't think making the bottom layer will be too difficult, but I'm not that far yet. My other thought was to do the corners first, then the edges.

So I guess what I'm asking, is if this is the general approach. Also, is there parity that I might come across where I most likely couldn't figure out myself? I mean I'm not the best puzzle solver, I just want to have some sense of accomplishment. So far I'm having trouble getting it to cubeshape, I've been playing with it about an hour with little progress.

Square-1 is an interesting and challenging puzzle, I never managed to solve it without any help so I don't really know much about intuitive approaches but you seem to be on the right track. Here's a little hint if you want them.

Oh and yes there is parity, but Stefan Pochmann found a way to solve it intuitively, try to search up the post, it's very interesting.

Spoiler

Solve orientation first, then permutation, and you can do corner then edges.

 

[Googlrr]

Hello one answer question thread, I hope you can help.

See, I just got my square-1, and I want to solve it myself. My goal is to not look at any help other than what I've seen previously (i.e. solving videos). I was wondering if I'm going in the right direction.

The way I see it, is to get the square-1 back into a cube, then solve it kinda LBL style. I don't think making the bottom layer will be too difficult, but I'm not that far yet. My other thought was to do the corners first, then the edges.

So I guess what I'm asking, is if this is the general approach. Also, is there parity that I might come across where I most likely couldn't figure out myself? I mean I'm not the best puzzle solver, I just want to have some sense of accomplishment. So far I'm having trouble getting it to cubeshape, I've been playing with it about an hour with little progress.

Square-1 is an interesting and challenging puzzle, I never managed to solve it without any help so I don't really know much about intuitive approaches but you seem to be on the right track. Here's a little hint if you want them.

Oh and yes there is parity, but Stefan Pochmann found a way to solve it intuitively, try to search up the post, it's very interesting.

Spoiler

Solve orientation first, then permutation, and you can do corner then edges.

Thanks I think I'm going to try the intuitive approach a bit more before I cave in. I'm stuck trying to get it in cubeshape with one edge and one corner swapped, and it seems like everything I do I get to the same exact case Dx.

 

[Deleted member 4527]

Hello one answer question thread, I hope you can help.

See, I just got my square-1, and I want to solve it myself. My goal is to not look at any help other than what I've seen previously (i.e. solving videos). I was wondering if I'm going in the right direction.

The way I see it, is to get the square-1 back into a cube, then solve it kinda LBL style. I don't think making the bottom layer will be too difficult, but I'm not that far yet. My other thought was to do the corners first, then the edges.

So I guess what I'm asking, is if this is the general approach. Also, is there parity that I might come across where I most likely couldn't figure out myself? I mean I'm not the best puzzle solver, I just want to have some sense of accomplishment. So far I'm having trouble getting it to cubeshape, I've been playing with it about an hour with little progress.

Square-1 is an interesting and challenging puzzle, I never managed to solve it without any help so I don't really know much about intuitive approaches but you seem to be on the right track. Here's a little hint if you want them.

Oh and yes there is parity, but Stefan Pochmann found a way to solve it intuitively, try to search up the post, it's very interesting.

Spoiler

Solve orientation first, then permutation, and you can do corner then edges.

Thanks I think I'm going to try the intuitive approach a bit more before I cave in. I'm stuck trying to get it in cubeshape with one edge and one corner swapped, and it seems like everything I do I get to the same exact case Dx.

Spoiler

that's the worst case
Hint: remember what shape is one move away from cube shape, and try to get that