:fp That was from this very thread, two pages ago. Honestly, did you even bother checking anywhere for this answer? I'll give an example of AUF. U. Here's another: U'. Oh, one more: U2.
That didn't really answer my question. I know about a5, a12, and even a100; check my signature. Many times, I see the averages, and the 3 or 10 times included are within the same consistent range, but the (time here) signifying the worst time is referred to as the "counting" time. What does counting mean, or am I just answering my own question?
That didn't really answer my question. I know about a5, a12, and even a100; check my signature. Many times, I see the averages, and the 3 or 10 times included are within the same consistent range, but the (time here) signifying the worst time is referred to as the "counting" time. What does counting mean, or am I just answering my own question?
Counting "XXX" means that its a time that affects your average.
So by that example, "I got a bloody counting 29, screwed up my average.". He means the 29 was a bad time but still not his worst, so it was still included in the average, thus counting.
Yes, even the lowest/highest times matter, because they still basically provide limits for the rest of the average.
As an example: You get (19), (24), 22, 19.5. The average so far is 20.75. For the average to be under 20, you need 22 + 19.5 + x < 60, so x < 18.5 But if you get an 18.5, that would be the lowest solve, and it would make the 19 count. So, it would be impossible to get a sub-20 average with those first four solves. It is interesting that they still matter even though they don't count
I have a question, how are mods/ administrators selected? I do not want to be one, I just want to know if they did something special on the forum, or they are just friends of an andministrantor ( man this is coming out wrong)
Just wanted to know
I'm looking for the shortest/fastest 2LPLL algorithm for diagonal corners. This way I'll be able to do 3LLL for ZZ, then I'll learn COLL and have a 2LLL no matter what. The Y Perm looks pretty good though.
are official scrambles (used in competitions) stored or saved somewhere?
If, for example, i want to try my "official" solves again, do I have any way to get the scrambles?
are official scrambles (used in competitions) stored or saved somewhere?
If, for example, i want to try my "official" solves again, do I have any way to get the scrambles?
They are not stored anywhere, but some competition organizers save the scrambles and post them on their websites. So it really depends which competition you went to.
are official scrambles (used in competitions) stored or saved somewhere?
If, for example, i want to try my "official" solves again, do I have any way to get the scrambles?
They are not stored anywhere, but some competition organizers save the scrambles and post them on their websites. So it really depends which competition you went to.
I'll give an example.
At the Stanford Fall 2009 competition at Stanford University, the scrambles that were used have been compiled in a .pdf by Lucas Garron and they are available on the competition website.
At the Thankscubing 2009 competition, there are no published scrambles.
ZZ. For the last 2 or 3 dedges, it wouldn't be that hard to avoid parity. I'm just looking for one that would allow me to orient the edges while I pair them, for ZZ.
Are your times better when you scream, shout, or yell? I was just wondering this, I would be really interested in seeing the results. If you wanted to, you could do 10 solves, make the odd numbered ones into an average of 5, make the even ones into an average of 5, and then compare them.