If I find one—but I suspect, having thought of how a systematic error might have been creeping in, I’m going to find out that’s all it was. When I get home and can try it I’ll report back.Could you send a scramble where this happens?
If I find one—but I suspect, having thought of how a systematic error might have been creeping in, I’m going to find out that’s all it was. When I get home and can try it I’ll report back.Could you send a scramble where this happens?
So, something like this case? As far as I know, that style of F2L alg case where you take out a solved pair to solve another doesn't have any specific name, it just comes up whenever. In general, solving F2L without taking out whole pairs is more intuitive, so cases where you do take out full pairs are typically optimized or genned algs.
Thanks for the reply, I will look into these. At the moment I feel like im at a crossroads where I am okay at 1 thing but to get good at another I need to take a step ina a direction! I'm just not sure what direction that step wants to be in.Well, you could try learning intuitive F2L (by yourself) but if you get really stuck, just look up F2L algs, and slowly memorise them all. There are 42 of them, but most tend to be short, you have a while, and if you understand it, you won’t need to memorise. Improving cross speed and LL recognition and execution will also help. Plus, don’t forget to look into other methods other than the one you are going with! That is called CFOP - Cross, F2L, OLL, PLL. Roux, ZZ and Petrus are alternatives, and there are many more
Thanks for all the help!Well, no need to hurry. Some people take months to decide what their main method will be by trying them all @Cubinwitdapizza
https://www.speedsolving.com/threads/beginners-guide-to-choosing-a-speedsolving-method.43471/
This is good for deciding.
lol thanks for mentioning me.Well, no need to hurry. Some people take months to decide what their main method will be by trying them all @Cubinwitdapizza
https://www.speedsolving.com/threads/beginners-guide-to-choosing-a-speedsolving-method.43471/
This is good for deciding.
fruruf magicHey does anybody have good algorithms for solving the following cases/pairs into the back-right slot?
1.) https://ibb.co/y0FfL8n
2.) https://ibb.co/Hnb6YJ3
pretty godlike.fruruf magic
1: (U2) F R U R' U' F' R' U' R
2: (U') R' U' F' U F R U' R' U' R
Wow I really like R' U' F' U F R U' R' U' R. Not only it is efficient, it is also very good for look ahead: a lot of the U layer pieces are preserved (do the inverse of the alg on a solved cube)fruruf magic
1: (U2) F R U R' U' F' R' U' R
2: (U') R' U' F' U F R U' R' U' R
Hi Guys,
I have been cubing now for a couple of weeks and I am loving it!
I have got my beginners method down! I have a PB of 1:04 and average around 1:20-1:30. But now I want to be even faster!!
I thought the best thing to do would be to learn F2L but im really struggling to get my head around it.
Is this the best way to go or is there another style I should be learning first.
Thanks.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
[AsR] Yiheng Wang 3.47 ASR 3x3 Single [W/ One Look F2L] | WR/CR/NR solves | 20 | ||
D | I created a online F2L Trainer | How-to's, Guides, etc. | 1 | |
3x3 F2L question | Cubing Help & Questions | 2 | ||
S | [Discussion] Alternatives to F2L Pairs | General Speedcubing Discussion | 1 | |
C | Advanced F2L - Wiki Discussion | Cubing Help & Questions | 6 |