• Welcome to SpeedSolving.com — the world’s largest puzzle community!

    You’re currently browsing as a guest, which means you have limited access to discussions, resources, member profiles, and community features.

    Join 50,000+ cubers and puzzle enthusiasts from around the world to ask questions, share solves, improve faster, and be part of the community.

    Registration is free, fast, and easycreate your account today.

    Already a member? Log in here to hide this message and start participating.

[Discussion] Alternatives to F2L Pairs

StachuK1992

statue
Joined
Jul 24, 2008
Messages
3,812
Location
West Chester, PA
WCA
2008KORI02
YouTube
Visit Channel
I don't think enough research has been done here.

This is under the assumption that the cross has been made and you want to reduce the cube to LL within 3-4 steps.

One suggestion; 2corners, 2edges, 2 corners, 2 edges.


There must be something here we've neglected, no?
Let's expand CFOP a bit more.
 
I once thought of doing the F2B like in Roux, then finish F2L by adding the DF and DB edges using M slices, then do OLL/PLL. I suppose that's effectively FreeFOP, but that could be effective for Roux users. Doing a Petrus 2x2x3, and then inserting the final cross edge and an F2L pair (X-cross style) and inserting the final F2L pair could be a liable alternative.

These are just ideas from the top of my head; I'm sure someone else can improve these/come up with better ideas.
 
Back
Top