Which should i learn first oll +pll or coll.( i'm already planning to learn both) I have 26.36 second best and a 32 average of 5 ( but i usually get 34-36 seconds and rarely 40 if its an pll case i dont know) Ive learned about 4 coll algroithms, 5 oll algroithms and 10 pll algroithms. Im also praticing to lookahead (any tips)
Agree with Brest - definitely PLL first. I learnt full PLL from the start, and it's made me so comfortable with my PLLs now that I know a couple of different angles for some.
I'm still working on OLL - know about 42/43 cases, but don't actively go out of my way to learn them!
COLL is only any help if you have good edge control, i.e. can influence whether OLL edges are yellow-up (assuming white cross) during F2L. If you use a method like ZZ that results in corners only OLLs, then learn COLL. If you use pure CFOP, you'd need some form of edge control on your last F2L insertion, then to recognise the COLL case quickly...
At least at first, you're better off learning C-F-O-P, by which I mean the separate steps of the method. Once you understand them all, you can look at how they influence each other, and maybe learn COLL, OLS, or even ZBLL?!
Just personally, I don't think COLL should be used as a shortcut to avoid learning full OLL.