alexc
Member
Yeah, multislotting might be worth a look. But I only really want to use the basic techniques to get down to 9-11 for now. Then, if I'm at 9-11 and add some advanced stuff maybe I can get 7-9!
I agree with Joël. There is no point going at the speed of wich you are able to see the next pair on the last pair. The first pair is the hardest, and then it just gets easier there for you should accelerate. Metronome should only be used to define your slowest speed. Why go at the exact same speed on every solve when solves differ in difficulty?
if u learned f2l with the 41 standard cases (like I did) learning some open slot techniques will DEFINITELY improve your time
1. OLL comes before PLL.
2. Do intuitive F2L. Trust me, I thought I couldn't do it either. It will be slower at first, but you will learn tricks and recognize cases. It's very easy, and you don't need to learn any algorithms. Badmephisto's videos are very good:
Part 1: http://youtube.com/watch?v=k-xbcAMfWwM
Part 2: http://youtube.com/watch?v=4GxLM_dZqg4
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
[AsR] Yiheng Wang 3.47 ASR 3x3 Single [W/ One Look F2L] | WR/CR/NR solves | 20 | ||
D | I created a online F2L Trainer | How-to's, Guides, etc. | 1 | |
3x3 F2L question | Cubing Help & Questions | 2 | ||
S | [Discussion] Alternatives to F2L Pairs | General Speedcubing Discussion | 1 | |
C | Advanced F2L - Wiki Discussion | Cubing Help & Questions | 6 |