PetraPine
Member
what? lol howIt would just be Waterman.
you do all the previous steps and than solve L8E, one way is to Reduce to L6E and solve that
what? lol howIt would just be Waterman.
thats not what i said,FB
WCLL
3 redges (reducing it to LSE)
LSE
I'm sorry but that's just worse than what I said.thats not what i said,
Psuedo FB
CLL/WCLL
Normal SB + EO
Last 2 L R edges (l2lr?)
(rotate)
L8E+E slice(which is actually pretty nice in columns)
ok so??I'm sorry but that's just worse than what I said.
L8E + E slice ergonomics would impact a ton, and it's less efficient, the problem is not EO's efficiency, no it's objectively small but it's definitely gonna make you pause for 500 years.(from me) "EO in the middle would impact lookahead a ton, then rotating (!!!!!11111) then L8E + E slice and the ergonomics for it is not great."
What you said is just waterman also here's the rundown
Fb-more efficient
2b-more efficient
Eo(same efficiency)
Oriented L8E(worse efficiency)
And a single rotation
So no you're wrong
Just do U m2 U2 stuff before rotationL8E + E slice ergonomics would impact a ton, and it's less efficient, the problem is not EO's efficiency, no it's objectively small but it's definitely gonna make you pause for 500 years.
(EO in the middle is actually the main reason Petrus is dismissed in the community.)
what? it kinda looks like you're denying disadvantages and just go with it.Just do U m2 U2 stuff before rotation
After Eo you dont have to use E slice because you can permute edges before rotationwhat?
I literally agreed in my post before last, I'm not doing that lolwhat? it kinda looks like you're denying disadvantages and just go with it.
Nope, EO in the middle still impacts alot and oriented L8E is bad for efficiency and ergonomics.EO in the middle would impact lookahead a ton, then rotating (!!!!!11111) then L8E + E slice and the ergonomics for it is not great.
[\QUOTE]
Also eo In the middle wouldn't impact Ll ahead that much because it's right before a rotation, so the rotation is the look ahead problem, also oriented l8e is easy to recog also it's in the same spot it would be normally not in the middle
[/QUOTE]Nope, EO in the middle still impacts alot and oriented L8E is bad for efficiency and ergonomics.
A. How? I've actually thought of L8E like this before, I dismissed because of the ergonomics.Also it being bad for ergenomics doesn't matter
A. It's only slightly worse.
B. It's made up for by more efficient steps through the rest of the solve
Every method has cons and this also has cons, I'm just pointing them out cause they are pretty significant here.BTW I'm not saying it's better than waterman I'm just arguing for why I think it's not a bad method and has pros
Ask people who use pcms, literally just one d move out put nthe two edges, put back l6e those arnt awful ergonomics lol.A. How? I've actually thought of L8E like this before, I dismissed because of the ergonomics.
B. How?
Well then they don't do it the best way, also, how is it relevant here? PCMS L8E is in different position while this L8E is in UR UL UF UB DF DB FR BRAsk people who use pcms, literally just one d move out in two edges, put back l6e those arnt awful ergonomics lol.
I don't use pcms, also youre prob wrong because you don't use it also this is just the most common approach not the approach for every solveWell then they don't do it the best way.