Username: Username:
Member
No, but it's interesting so nothing to sneeze at.it could be more efficient maybe, also its a hybrid of Columns and waterman with qsuedo ""elements""
lol forgot cll wcll are algs im so tired
No, but it's interesting so nothing to sneeze at.it could be more efficient maybe, also its a hybrid of Columns and waterman with qsuedo ""elements""
lol forgot cll wcll are algs im so tired
why not?
Too many steps, like why wouldn't you solve just strictly solve the redges? it leads to an unnecessary extra step.why not?
I guess youre right, but adding steps doesnt make it less efficient as the smaller steps themselves are more efficient individuallyToo many steps, like why wouldn't you solve just strictly solve the redges? it leads to an unnecessary extra step.
I really wouldn't say intuitive L8EP is efficient.I guess youre right, but adding steps doesnt make it less efficient as the smaller steps themselves are more efficient individually
i mean, it is tho also did i say it had to be intuitive?I really wouldn't say intuitive L8EP is efficient.
if the Pseudo FB pieces aren't oriented, you wouldn't get L8EP in the end.you could do
Psuedo FB
CLL/WCLL
Normal SB + EO
Last 2 L R edges (l2lr?)
(rotate)
L8E+E slice(which is actually pretty nice in columns)
L8EP would be like so many algs, just learn 1LLL instead lel also, how?i mean, it is tho also did i say it had to be intuitive?
also dude the edges are already oriented so yes it is.
You're making it seem like L8EP seems brilliant.they are
i said they would be
i thought thats what phsuedo meant
for example
like Orange face with only red and orange edges oriented
??????? what?You're making it seem like L8EP seems brilliant.
firstly, L8EP on the side would have terrible ergonomics??????? what?
i was explaining what i meant there,
also i never said it was BrIlIANTANTT
i was explaining how the step worked.
i never said you couldnt reduce it to thatAs someone who's used PCMS more than most, I can say for sure that L8E or even L8E with EO done beforehand, isn't a great step. The fastest method to solve L8E is probably to reduce it to Roux LSE, and then you're just doing a slow hybrid of PCMS and Roux, if I understand your steps correctly
read my post i say rotate first twicefirstly, L8EP on the side would have terrible ergonomics
Even what you're talking about is PCMS L8E which is UR UL UF UB DF DB DR DL and this is LSE + FR and BR, PCMS' L8E is more ergonomic.As someone who's used PCMS more than most, I can say for sure that L8E or even L8E with EO done beforehand, isn't a great step. The fastest method to solve L8E is probably to reduce it to Roux LSE, and then you're just doing a slow hybrid of PCMS and Roux, if I understand your steps correctly
rotating would actually make it worse xdread my post i say rotate first twice
It would just be Waterman.i never said you couldnt reduce it to that