i would probably count it as a 2.5 step/look lsll, you can plan cross+1 corner in inspection but that takes away from planning other thingsThe corner's supposed to go in the same way as an x-cross, would that still count as 3 step lsll?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

i would probably count it as a 2.5 step/look lsll, you can plan cross+1 corner in inspection but that takes away from planning other thingsThe corner's supposed to go in the same way as an x-cross, would that still count as 3 step lsll?
What exactly is solved right before you do your ELS thing?
I think it would be better to just do an XCross then. If you ignore the edge that gets put with the corner you might trap an F2L edge. Also, you would have to keep in mind the orientation of the edge that the corner goes with. You could end up with some nasty cases in terms of algs if you have nonoriented edges in that slot. IDK if you've made any algs for this or not, but there's a pretty good chance some of the algs are gonna be pretty ugly.After the x-cross-corner-thing, you do the 3 pairs that you can do, then the CLS thing then the ZZLL thing
1) Cross + 2 Corners.
2) 3 F2L Pair
3) ELS
4) OCLL
5) PLL
It’s an extra step.That seems better to me
That's phasing bud.maybe I could just make a vhls variant that permutes only 2 edges and then do zzll
you mean like without EO? I think it would be worse.yea but sans zz
then you need to practice your EO steps.people like me who aren't good at eo steps