Using L2S to solve corners by orientation then permutation may not be a bad idea, the recog would be much quicker, it would combine parts of steps and I imagine the move length average wouldn't be too bad because of all the freedom...
I don't think L2S would be very efficient, NMCLL already exists so why don't we us the recog from that?
Haha it's funny how you're calling us noobs. If you could even comprehend that what we're talking about is NON-MATCHING CLL then maybe I'd spend some time explaining the things you don't understand about how this method works.
He has a point, though. The ergonomics aren't that great, but that can be fixed. I will work on this idea because it seems cool and probably tomorrow I'll share what I've experimented with.
Perfect example of how to lose all respect in one post.
If that's what makes people lose all respect for me I'm surprised that you think people still respected me.
I respect you, because the methods you propose(ECE EZD) work. i mean, cmon, ECE has gotten sub-10, and Ive seen no other new up and comig method get that low.
Well thank you. I was referring to our friend back there saying that I lost all respect with that post. I don't even understand how that's possible if little outbursts like that made me lose all respect I would have lost all of it a long time ago XD
Its really easy to lose respect if youre like me and have none in the first place.
That isn't true I respect you you've put a lot of work into a lot of different methods and you've helped other people a lot. anyway this conversation doesn't really fit here so let's set this aside and focus on methods now since respect isn't even what I'm going for I just want to suggest useful ideas for new methods.
how about this:
How?
petrus blocks are very efficient, and with the stuff me and some other people are working on, we will make petrus great again(trump, shut up, no one likes you.)
This is already part of the method. After a 2x2x3 is made it's put in the back and eo is done. They do a y' and have 2gen f2l.
Who are you?
hes a decent person who created a method that has gotten sub-10 solves. he is also active here a lot. Ill vouch for him. On the other hand, I have never seen you anywhere on the forum, you dont seem too active.
aha! but the EO is solved intuitively While expanding to a 2x2x3 so as soon as youre done with it there is no need for rotations.
No, I don't talk a lot in the forums. I'm pretty active on the cubes subreddit.
We should make a roast thread so if things get too hot on the other threads, they just take it to the roasting thread.
