CornerTwisted
Member
I no longer trust your judgement
part of why mehta also is bad
part of why mehta also is bad
I thought everyone now agreed that Mehta was objectively worse Petrus?I no longer trust your judgement
Yup we found out that mehta ends up worse in many of the ways it tried to be better...I thought everyone now agreed that Mehta was objectively worse Petrus?
People haven't committed enough time to learning it and becoming world-class with it as with CFOP or Roux or even ZZ. Those methods have been around for more than 7 years, at least. Mehta is not even 3 years old at this point. If the method had been around for longer, it would probably be a different story. It's just gonna take time.Yup we found out that mehta ends up worse in many of the ways it tried to be better...
It's a cool method but just not objectively among the top.
Mehta-TDR (the best version) was also invented by a French person in 2017 and then abandoned because it sucked, only to be rediscovered and again be found not worth using.People haven't committed enough time to learning it and becoming world-class with it as with CFOP or Roux or even ZZ. Those methods have been around for more than 7 years, at least. Mehta is not even 3 years old at this point. If the method had been around for longer, it would probably be a different story. It's just gonna take time.
The end of the method is mostly algorithmic, so people can start learning how to cancel between steps and stuff like that.
It's not that Mehta is new and that's why it's bad. It's that it has been proven to be worse than Petrus/APB. Athefre did a comparison between Mehta, Petrus, APB, and maybe some other variants and the results conclusively showed Mehta to be worse. Most of the people who initially used Mehta switched methods because of this. People need to accept that Mehta is not ever going to surpass Petrus/APB.People haven't committed enough time to learning it and becoming world-class with it as with CFOP or Roux or even ZZ. Those methods have been around for more than 7 years, at least. Mehta is not even 3 years old at this point. If the method had been around for longer, it would probably be a different story. It's just gonna take time
links on petrus/apb please?It's not that Mehta is new and that's why it's bad. It's that it has been proven to be worse than Petrus/APB. Athefre did a comparison between Mehta, Petrus, APB, and maybe some other variants and the results conclusively showed Mehta to be worse. Most of the people who initially used Mehta switched methods because of this. People need to accept that Mehta is not ever going to surpass Petrus/APB.
Every method is a worse version of Petrusisn't this just a slightly worse version of petrus?
Well it doesnt, but you can get some sort of parity, becquse you can have just 2 edges and 2 corners swapped.L5EP doesn't involve the corners at all, so the algs don't change
I guess you could gen them yourself with trangium's batch solver, or you could just solve corners and then do L5EP like everyone else.Well it doesnt, but you can get some sort of parity, becquse you can have just 2 edges and 2 corners swapped.
Is this really what you spent all that time harping about as one of the best methods? It's worse zz-d, which is itself worse than zz-a.i came up with a method called ZZ-ZPL2
step 1: EO222
step 2: F2L-1
step 3: CP
step 4: insert last corner while making 2x2x1 block on backright.
step 5: solve with 18 algorithms
stop that. its a good method.Is this really what you spent all that time harping about as one of the best methods? It's worse zz-d, which is itself worse than zz-a.
yaeh i invented a better zz variant called ZZ-ZPL2 That ignores one line edgeHello my friends,
I was just wondering around, trying out stuff with ZZ and i thought about something. You know there is a type of ZZ called portico where instead of EOline you just solve one piece of EOline and ignore the other. Well as many of you know almost nobody now uses EOline, so i thought what if i do EOcross but ignore the DF edge? And than for last slot added winter variation of VLS. Turns out you are left with L5EP and CP. And i thought ok when i solve L5EP there are only 5 cases you can get after and those are Aa perm, Ab perm, H perm, E perm and solved state. But turns out the algs i found said there are 16 cases for L5EP, but it didnt include algs that don't have solved CP. So i did some diging and turns out, I cant find any of the algs I was looking for. If someone does know where to find these algs are, or has these alg please send them to me, i will be very grateful.
You can't just say that with no evidence. You can start by proving why it's better than zz-d which is eocross, f2l-1, solve pair and cp, 2gll.stop that. its a good method.