L' U L y' R U2 RAlg for this front left case (green-orange pair)?
Been getting it a lot, feels like there should be a rotationless way or at most one rotation.
No, I use intuitive but I know algs for some cases.
It makes the pair, then insert it the way that preserves EO. I think that algorithmic f2l is awful because 1 you dont know what the alg does to the rest of the cube most of the time unless you memorize it and 2 you aren't able to do case influencing. I have not learned a single f2l alg in my life and don't plan to.
I figure I can just an F move for this case. Or another solution.
Honestly, I don't think that algs are the best way to do F2L. The thing about intuitive F2L is you can do whatever you want to complete it. You can do some really cool stuff by pairing one f2l pair while inserting another. I also don't agree with your statement that some algs are too fast to pass up. Most of my f2l pairs are very close to sub-1 and I don't think an alg is that much faster and it won't be worth sacrificing lookahead and case influencing. I also think it's interesting that Patrick ponce said that he also never uses f2l algs.
Alg for this front left case (green-orange pair)?
Been getting it a lot, feels like there should be a rotationless way or at most one rotation.
I use U' L F' L' F U2 L' U L
True I didn't notice that.
And if someone can help me properly schedule my F2L cases according to their difficulty and which one to learns first/later, then I guess I can't ask for anything more!
You will stumble along intuitive F2L with experience. Algorithmic F2L is the worst kind of F2L.All suggestions, critiques and tips will be fairly appreciated!
Pretty much true dude! But then, whats the solution to it?
Sorry wdym?
This is a great video showing every F2L case.
That was obvious from my previous post.
