PetrusQuber
Member
Maybe Petrus-W deserves it’s own thread?
If you wish you can create one, but I don't want to be the one creating it. It'll seem like I just want attention.Maybe Petrus-W deserves it’s own thread?
I guess, but it has 2x as many algs as ZZLL.
Yeah, but ZZ-B averages 1.5 more moves than ZZ-abut less than ZZ-a, which is indisputably the best ZZ variant right now
Yeah, but ZZ-B averages 1.5 more moves than ZZ-a
Yeah, I just meant ZZ-b may have a better movecount.? I'm not suggesting ZZ-B
I just realized Petrus—W is basically Petrus but switching to a Roux variant halfway through.
I have a CFOP to Petrus/ZZ idea:
1. F2L-2/XXCross
2. EO
3. Petrus/ZZ
I guess but you do it CFOP style.That's literally Petrus/Petrus-W except you put in an extra cross edge
I guess but you do it CFOP style.
I meant this:
1. Cross
2. F2L-2
3. EO
4. ZZ/Petrus
Also, you can do different F2L insertions.
Not really inserted, because cross already does that. The problem with just doing Petrus-W is it loses being CFOP.Like I said, it's Petrus/Petrus-W with an extra cross edge inserted, which is worse
Allrighty, I got this idea for a petrus variant :
1. 2x2 in back
2. 223 in back
3. EO from front, (front determines the orientation of the E edges, like in ZZ)
4. Left and right F2L pairs
5. COLL
6. L5EP
This could be good since you don't have to rotate, you have more ergonomic 22 and 223s, you get to orient 4 edges at a time instead of 2, and you have less pieces to solve after EO.
CLP for Roux sounds good, but if there are more algs than CMLL or COLL then it's not really suitable. This would be like doing Last Pair in Roux and then Winter Variation, something like WVLP + Roux. Less Algs than CMLL maybe in some situations and can be influenced in the solve, but not really practical if you want to be sub 10 maybe (?)