Zane_C
Premium Member
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2009
- Messages
- 2,756
- Location
- ~100km W of Melbourne, Australia
- WCA ID
- 2010CARN01
- YouTube
- Visit Channel
Indeed. :tuI could probably be a little more efficient, but that's okay and comes with experimentation, methinks.
Perhaps try easing into BH by only using commutators for obvious cases (such as 8-movers/pure comms). If you can't recognise the insertion/interchange straight away, just use OP. Also try incorporating 10 move orthogonal cases (1 move setup into a pure comm), they're simple and are very easy to recognise (see byu's BH tutorial). Once you're satisfied with pure and orthogonal commutators, focus on integrating more difficult cases, such as A9s (unless you're already fine with these), cyclic shifts, columns and per specials.Sure, I'm familiar with commutators and whatnot, but it takes me a forever and a half to find the appropriate one for the job whilst blindfolded (not to mention mine seem to be inefficient and make me forget A' or B'). Does any one have any tips (other than the obvious practice) to get better at this?
At the end of solves, take note of the cases you had trouble with, then you can refer to a list of commutators for assistance. As you do more and more solves you'll start to notice that you use OP less, and less, until OP is used on just a few cases (or none).
That's just a suggestion, it's how I approached BH (by the way, my transition from OP to BH was quite slow and gradual).
Probably not study the page, but certainly use it as a reference for whenever you get stuck on a case (as previously mentioned).I know of this page but the amount algorithms (even if they are comms) is kind of disheartening. Is there perhaps a 3-cycle method that would help me transition into BH/freestyle, or is my only hope to study that page ("like it's boobs")?