abunickabhi
Member
I want to understand the extent of transfer learning between the 4 events,
3blind, 4blind, 5blind and multi blind.
There are obvious relations like 3blind and multi blind involve the same exec method , and only the memo technique differs.
Also, 4blind is a subset to 5blind, as all the 3 piece types of 4blind are there in 5blind along with 2 additional piece types.
But, there are a lot of caveats to these obvious relations. I would like to get insights and explore these caveats.
I understand the transfer learning may differ person to person, as the practice level for each of the blindsolving event may differ.
I also understand the turning speed for each events differ, like we can be riskier in 3blind compared to multi blind.
And we can go faster in 4blind exec compared to 5blind exec due to one lesser layer.
There are more nuances and caveats that I cannot think of at this point, hence I made this discussion thread.
3blind, 4blind, 5blind and multi blind.
There are obvious relations like 3blind and multi blind involve the same exec method , and only the memo technique differs.
Also, 4blind is a subset to 5blind, as all the 3 piece types of 4blind are there in 5blind along with 2 additional piece types.
But, there are a lot of caveats to these obvious relations. I would like to get insights and explore these caveats.
I understand the transfer learning may differ person to person, as the practice level for each of the blindsolving event may differ.
I also understand the turning speed for each events differ, like we can be riskier in 3blind compared to multi blind.
And we can go faster in 4blind exec compared to 5blind exec due to one lesser layer.
There are more nuances and caveats that I cannot think of at this point, hence I made this discussion thread.
