fdskljgrie
Member
Nice! What do you average using it?
30-35Nice! What do you average using it?
In Petrus you always do EO then F2L. There's no need for ZBLSDo Petrus untill F2L-1 and do ZB For the rest
4. Alternatively finish F2L and do a ZBLL
And also not new.Funni Method might not be viable
This is literally Petrus. Roux FB turning into "Petrus Block" is a 223. Petrus calls for building a 223, just like APB and Mehta. You get to that stage through the fastest way possible, your proposal is actually the recommended way for 223.Funni Method might not be viable.
1. Make a Roux block
2. Turn it into a Petrus block
3. Do Petrus untill F2L-1 and do ZB For the rest
4. Alternatively finish F2L and do a ZBLL
Very cool idea, I think it's worth bumping. Have algorithms for CPLE been created?So, here's another method idea:
1) Standard Roux FB on left
1.5) Solve the BR/BDR F2L pair.
2) Use keyhole to solve the rest of the first layer, minus DF and DFR pieces
2.5) Solve DFR while making sure FR edge is oriented - maybe 4 moves on average
3) EODF
4) CPLE - Corner permutation + last F2L edge, I'm pretty sure this has 12 algs (6 if you just mirror the others)
5) 2GLL
You could also do CPFB as the first step and adjust the other steps a bit to avoid having to recognize CP mid-solve.
Seems like a similar idea to ZZ-Blah. I like the idea.New choice for CFOP from JAPAN.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FhXBe2qJ6i_iN5vzaLNvx02CmZNxQzlJ/view
Read with Google Translate.
Neat idea; however, why force that case in particular? To me it seems like you came up with the name first and then built a method around it. Generally forcing an Anti-ZBLL is suboptimal.New choice for CFOP from JAPAN.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FhXBe2qJ6i_iN5vzaLNvx02CmZNxQzlJ/view
Read with Google Translate.
thank you!Neat idea; however, why force that case in particular? To me it seems like you came up with the name first and then built a method around it. Generally forcing an Anti-ZBLL is suboptimal.
This is a very old concept called many things such as transformation/non-matching F2L, etcI don't know if this has been proposed before, but if the recognition is worth it, you can conjugate OLL and PLL in CFOP.
Steps:
1. Cross
2. F2L-1
3. 1x1x2 in the U-layer (less moves than last pair)
4. Do an R/R' (depending on the location of the corner and the edge in the pair)
5. OLL
6. PLL
7. Undo the R/R'
Example Solve (regular CFOP would be faster for this one, but just an example):
alg.cubing.net link
L2 D' B2 F2 R2 D U2 R2 F2 U' B2 U R F2 U F' L' D2 R2 F U'
z2 // inspection
F' (R L) (B F2) // cross
R' U' R L' U2 L // 1st pair
y R U2 R2' U' R2 U R' U2 L' U' L // 2nd+3rd pair
U2 R' F R F' y' R' // setup psuedo-LL
M R U R' U R U2 R' U M' // OLL
U R' U2 R U2 R' F R U R' U' R' F' R' // PLL with cancellation
Completely forgot about this method lol, I don't think it's a method worth pursuing though, it's kinda just Roux but with extra steps that don't make the solve fasterVery cool idea, I think it's worth bumping. Have algorithms for CPLE been created?
I suppose it could be compared with Roux though I think it's more similar to MI1. I do agree that it's inferior to Roux but I just think that CPLE sounds like a really cool algset.Completely forgot about this method lol, I don't think it's a method worth pursuing though, it's kinda just Roux but with extra steps that don't make the solve faster