Iwannaganx
Member
I meant singleEasily? I would think sub-4 wr average
I meant singleEasily? I would think sub-4 wr average
Then we will not need 1 hour for FMC.I think eventually we will be one-looking
one looking does seem a bit of a stretch. especially in 15 SECONDS!Then we will not need 1 hour for FMC.
I did say eventually. I don't think it will be in my lifetime, or anytime soon. But if people do one look, the algs might be long. But yes not one hour probsThen we will not need 1 hour for FMC.
Which means FMC will have to be removed?I did say eventually. I don't think it will be in my lifetime, or anytime soon. But if people do one look, the algs might be long. But yes not one hour probs
Wait, how do you work out the limits on a method?If you look at the limits of CFOP, it's around 4.2 seconds so I don't see any sub 4 averages happening because people won't reach that level of optimisation. You need to find a method that has a limit sub 3.8 to persuade me that sub 4 is possible.
ProbsWhich means FMC will have to be removed?
Being able to one-look solves doesn't equal FMC changing much. If I'm able to one-look a 35-move solve, that isn't super helpful for FMC. In addition, FMC relies a LOT on trial-and-error, something that isn't applicable in speedsolving.Which means FMC will have to be removed?
You look at the movecount, give it a theoretical tps for each step and boom. It's not an exact science but it gives a rough idea.Wait, how do you work out the limits on a method?
Cool...?I bought an x-man Wingy and haven't touched it in like weeks...
If you look at the limits of CFOP, it's around 4.2 seconds so I don't see any sub 4 averages happening because people won't reach that level of optimisation. You need to find a method that has a limit sub 3.8 to persuade me that sub 4 is possible.
I too look for a fingertricky solution using a speedsolving method for FMC...Then we will not need 1 hour for FMC.
Yeah, Sameer has a 2.78 or something and several other people have sub-4s at home. Eventually somebody will get the right combination of scrambled and get a sub-4.Ok couple things here. Limit doesn't mean averages can't be below that, that's just a limit for global. Even now sub 3 singles are possible. I don't see how sub 4 averages just aren't gonna happen.
I too look for a fingertricky solution using a speedsolving method for FMC...
Predictions: who do you think will get the next world record single?eah, Sameer has a 2.78 or something and several other people have sub-4s at home.
It will be max park, Feliks uses CFP now and max will be like stuff you imma use CF.Tanzer Balimtas is fairly sure only 4 people have sub 3s at home. Max, Feliks, Patrick and Namh.
That said, out of those four, I think Patrick and Namh are most likely to get the new WR. But it could be anybody with a lucky scramble and a lucky solve.
@Kit Clement is there currently any discussion amongst WCA members like yourself in removing Clock as an official event? Assuming you can disclose that information to the public..
LOLNew event idea:
Pyraminx but you put a screw in it and you have to keep the screw inside the pyra and solve it