Curvy Copter in my opinion is definitely the most viable of new events.
The hardware is kinda bad, yes, but that leaves a lot of room for improvement. Isn't that what happened for Skewb, Square-1, and big cubes?
There is no great method for it yet. Very recently, there have been developments in Last 4 Corners algorithms, but there is definitely room for improvement throughout. With the UWR being around 50 seconds (I think? Idek where I'd find that) there is definitely room for improvement throughout. It is the kind of puzzle that definitely won't warrent any sort ridiculous lucky single, like 2x2 or Pyraminx.
It is not like any other WCA puzzle.
All other puzzles turn either on a face, or with a slice or something. There is no puzzle that turns along an edge, like the Curvy Copter does. Most cubers will probably have no idea how to approach a puzzle like this, and it would present a good challenge to most cubers, and give them a new challenge.
Yeah, people with experience will be able to figure it out quickly, and itll be easy, yada yada yada, but... The community isn't all advanced, world-class cubers. And competitions aren't just for these elite cubers, right?
With 3x3 Feet possibly being removed, there would be a spot for a new puzzle.
Perhaps the Curvy Copter could be the puzzle that could fill the spot. And for those of you saying that it would be too many events for a competition... Well, most competitions hold barely a third of the events. Championships would be fine with the absence of Feet. Maybe it would take up even less time, considering that many Feet attempts can take upwards of 4 minutes.
But wait! What about jumbling!?
I'll admit, you'd have me there. This is the only problem with it.
The only other jumbling puzzle is Square-1. And even then, the jumbling is maneagable and intuitive.
With a Curvy Copter... It is a lot more difficult.
A scrambler would prove to be difficult. And notation might be a bother. But in the few weeks that the Curvy Copter has gained traction, I have seen multiple viable notations, and work on a scrambler. I'm sorry, but I refuse to believe that the geniuses on this forum and in this community would be stumped by this. I know for a fact that there are some people willing to take on the challenge, and are already doing so.
.
.
If this post seems to repeat a lot of the info previously posted in this thread, then that's because it probably does. This is just meant to be a post encapsuling all of the reasons and logic as to why I think that this puzzle is a viable event for a WCA competition. Feel free to agree or disagree. I want to spark discussion. That's why this thread is a thing.