• Welcome to SpeedSolving.com — the world’s largest puzzle community!

    You’re currently browsing as a guest, which means you have limited access to discussions, resources, member profiles, and community features.

    Join 50,000+ cubers and puzzle enthusiasts from around the world to ask questions, share solves, improve faster, and be part of the community.

    Registration is free, fast, and easy — create your account today.

    Already a member? Log in here to hide this message and start participating.
My first timed blind solve! My first non-timed solve was earlier today in bed during my morning coffee. I really dove into this just yesterday!

A couple questions.
What were your first times?

On this solve, I had a parity error after I solved the corners, 3 times ended up back at the buffer during edges, and had one final piece I had to flip. Is this all typical for every blind solve, or did I just get a rough one?

IMG_0002_zpsenmxnrzn.jpg
 
My first timed blind solve! My first non-timed solve was earlier today in bed during my morning coffee. I really dove into this just yesterday!

A couple questions.
What were your first times?

On this solve, I had a parity error after I solved the corners, 3 times ended up back at the buffer during edges, and had one final piece I had to flip. Is this all typical for every blind solve, or did I just get a rough one?

http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b343/CMUviolin/IMG_0002_zpsenmxnrzn.jpg
Nice time! My first solve was 5 days, and then I got a 15:56.99 Mo3 a while later.

Parity happens every 1/2 solves, and you'll get flipped/twisted pieces quite often. But you won't usually get your buffer being solved 3 times.
 
Nice time! My first solve was 5 days, and then I got a 15:56.99 Mo3 a while later.

Parity happens every 1/2 solves, and you'll get flipped/twisted pieces quite often. But you won't usually get your buffer being solved 3 times.

Thank you.

By the end of the day yesterday after watching quite a few YouTube videos I was doing the corners and then looking at the edges. I tried it again this morning with splitting the memorization in half with success, and then said to my wife... "I'm going to try it." I don't know how long I was looking at it during the memorization part, but I nearly scared her to death after my excitement when I actually solved it. I was pretty mentally exhausted after that. I waited an hour and timed myself. I would say it was on par in excitement with the first time I ever solved a cube!
 
Thank you.

By the end of the day yesterday after watching quite a few YouTube videos I was doing the corners and then looking at the edges. I tried it again this morning with splitting the memorization in half with success, and then said to my wife... "I'm going to try it." I don't know how long I was looking at it during the memorization part, but I nearly scared her to death after my excitement when I actually solved it. I was pretty mentally exhausted after that. I waited an hour and timed myself. I would say it was on par in excitement with the first time I ever solved a cube!

Haha, yeah, the first time is always the best :) It gets easier the more you do it, and soon you'll be able to do 3 to 5 solves before needing a break. I did edges only solving a few times before my first full attempt too - but it took me until I had my blindfold on to realise I hadn't practised corners [emoji14] I got lucky though and got a success, although I don't think I was as excited about it as I was with 4BLD.
 
How do you get comfortable enough with a method of 3BLD that you want to attempt a timed BLD solve?
Practise edges and corners separately, and when you're getting successes most of the time with both, then try combining them.
(remember to practise on a fully scrambled cube, not just one with one type of piece scrambled, since this still leaves the possibility of parity. It also makes memorising more realistic)
 
TDM & Berd:

Thank you yet again for the advice. I can't count on both hands and feet how many times you both have helped me in my solving endeavors.
 
Issues with M2 (perhaps parity?)

Hello,

I frequently end up with the buffer edges (DF and UB) twisted after a M2 solve. Does that have to do with parity? Am I doing something wrong or is it something I can recognise and memorise during my solve?

I practised the algorithms with Andy Klise's guide (here) and in his example solve he has one very strange (since there is no comment on this) step: F2 MUMUMU2 M'UM'UM'U2 F2 M2 This is fixing the orientation of DF and UB. Why does he do that?

Can someone of the experts please explain that?

Best regards

Sebastian
 
Back
Top