The New Method / Substep / Concept Idea Thread

[Deleted member 51471]

This is a mix of HK and Petrus-W
Next time, post in the new method thread to see if it'll get any attention before making a new thread.

 

[Nir1213]

Well, ok. But it can be improved, and that's what Lukas is looking for, right? So if we improve this this could have a better potential. Methods that seem bad to other people might actually be fit and good for others.

Sent from my TA-1025 using Tapatalk

 

[whaffle]

This is a mix of HK and Petrus-W
Next time, post in the new method thread to see if it'll get any attention before making a new thread.

he posted it in the new method thread but it didn't get any attention lol

 

[Nir1213]

This is a mix of HK and Petrus-W
Next time, post in the new method thread to see if it'll get any attention before making a new thread.

Yes, I forgot to tell him that. You could propose the method there. But this thread could help since it's mainly focused on this method instead of others and here we can talk and make improvements on this method.

Sent from my TA-1025 using Tapatalk

 

[whaffle]

Well, ok. But it can be improved, and that's what Lukas is looking for, right? So if we improve this this could have a better potential. Methods that seem bad to other people might actually be fit and good for others.

Sent from my TA-1025 using Tapatalk

if we improve this, it'll become HK or a variant

 

[Deleted member 51471]

Yes, I forgot to tell him that. You could propose the method there. But this thread could help since it's mainly focused on this method instead of others and here we can talk and make improvements on this method.

Sent from my TA-1025 using Tapatalk

With that point, we should make new threads for every method to improve them.

 

[TerryD]

what is the point of this method, it's inefficient and doesn't have any outstanding features

 

[mukerflap]

Just because you think of a weird variant doesnt mean you have to male an entire thread about it, there are 0 positives of this method compared to normal petrus

 

[Nir1213]

what is the point of this method, it's inefficient and doesn't have any outstanding features

It might be now, but it can be improved into a better method.

Sent from my TA-1025 using Tapatalk

 

[I'm A Cuber]

Honestly, Petrus Francisco would be 222->223->f2l minus df edge and dfr corner-> hexagonal Francisco finish

 

[Spacey10]

Bruh every single method gets made in the MegaThread, even flipping YAU was made in that thread!

 

[Nir1213]

Bruh every single method gets made in the MegaThread, even flipping YAU was made in that thread!

:0
but thats for mega we talkin 3x3 here!

 

[Spacey10]

I have zero idea what you just said but ok

I said the 4x4 method Yau was made in the new method thread

:0
but thats for mega we talkin 3x3 here!

I meant mega thread, not megaminx

 

[Hazel]

While this method may be unique in its own way, unique doesn't necessarily mean good. In Petrus, you would do EO -> 2-gen-F2L -> ZBLL. This method splits that into four smaller steps. In general, and definitely here, few big steps is faster than many small steps (due to look-ahead, transition time, etc). Not saying you shouldn't try to make methods—because you absolutely should—but this one probably isn't one worth exploring further.

As for it having its own thread, you are supposed to use the megathread, regardless of whether you want your method to have its own thread or not. If you propose a method in the megathread and the general consensus among others is that it's a good method worthy of exploration, only then should it get its own thread.

EDIT: yep, it was moved to the megathread

 

[Spacey10]

ok so LMCF has its own thread, why dont you move it here. You did it to Petrus Francisco (whoever moved my thread over here).

Because they worked hard on it and didn't make a method in 3 minutes

 

[PetraPine]

LMCF is good/original

 

[Hazel]

ok so LMCF has its own thread, why dont you move it here. You did it to Petrus Francisco (whoever moved my thread over here).

I believe it was proposed here first—people talked about it, and decided that it was a method with high potential, and thus it deserves its own thread.

 

[Spacey10]

wait what are they, i didnt know :0

The thread this is in right now, anything that can be grouped into something else is a mega thread (lol what would you call the megaminx mega thread? Mega mega thread?)

 

[Deleted member 51471]

The creator of LMCF spent months genning algs and working on a tutorial. It deserved it's own thread.

 

[Spacey10]

i proposed petrus francisco here first before i made my own thread about it. It deserves its own thread

Then there would be about 500 threads just lurking around, advance your method and we'll see