• Welcome to SpeedSolving.com — the world’s largest puzzle community!

    You’re currently browsing as a guest, which means you have limited access to discussions, resources, member profiles, and community features.

    Join 50,000+ cubers and puzzle enthusiasts from around the world to ask questions, share solves, improve faster, and be part of the community.

    Registration is free, fast, and easy — create your account today.

    Already a member? Log in here to hide this message and start participating.

Odd WCA stats/ Stats request Thread

Malkom said:
Stumbled upon Rama temmink's WCA-profile and saw that his best 3x3 average ranking and time are the "same", is he the only one or are there more of these?
Click to expand...

Changes pretty much everytime a new comp is added, but here they are as of the export I downloaded earlier today.

personID eventid a/s best worldrank
2010TUOZ01 444 average 7947 7947
2017SHAR06 444 average 7947 7947
2015TIAN09 444 average 7947 7947

I did look at this yesterday on an old WCA export and there were a lot more.

SELECT personID, eventid, 'average' `a/s`, best, worldrank from ranksaverage where best=worldrank
UNION
SELECT personID, eventid, 'single' `a/s`, best, worldrank from rankssingle where best=worldrank
 
guysensei1 said:
Fastest time taken (in terms of days/years) to complete all WCA events?

Is there anyone who completed all on their first comp?
Click to expand...
This is my new goal, to be the fastest one to get a silver membership. :D

6x6 and 7x7 will be the most difficult events, as I don't even have the cubes yet. Feet and clock will be fairly easy to get an average at, I think. Oh yeah, and I've not yet competed in 5x5 either, but that's also easy, I guess.
 
Last edited:
Country | Having sub 10 average | Having average | Ratio |
|------------------------|---------------|----------------|--------------|
| Slovenia | 3 | 72 | 4.1667 % |
| Bulgaria | 1 | 24 | 4.1667 % |
| Greece | 4 | 127 | 3.1496 % |
| Ireland | 2 | 69 | 2.8986 % |
| Czech Republic | 4 | 150 | 2.6667 % |
| Lithuania | 1 | 46 | 2.1739 % |
| Korea | 22 | 1035 | 2.1256 % |
| Thailand | 7 | 337 | 2.0772 % |
| Germany | 26 | 1306 | 1.9908 % |
| Taiwan | 16 | 905 | 1.7680 % |
| Sweden | 12 | 681 | 1.7621 % |
| United Kingdom | 12 | 714 | 1.6807 % |
| Austria | 2 | 119 | 1.6807 % |
| Japan | 18 | 1143 | 1.5748 % |
| Switzerland | 4 | 256 | 1.5625 % |
| Poland | 31 | 2039 | 1.5204 % |
| Russia | 19 | 1324 | 1.4350 % |
| Singapore | 5 | 355 | 1.4085 % |
| Belgium | 3 | 221 | 1.3575 % |
| Italy | 8 | 605 | 1.3223 % |
| Finland | 3 | 236 | 1.2712 % |
| Netherlands | 5 | 395 | 1.2658 % |
| Hungary | 7 | 593 | 1.1804 % |
| France | 16 | 1384 | 1.1561 % |
| Belarus | 3 | 293 | 1.0239 % |
| Denmark | 3 | 297 | 1.0101 % |
| Norway | 4 | 398 | 1.0050 % |
| Hong Kong | 3 | 302 | 0.9934 % |
| USA | 134 | 13551 | 0.9889 % |
| Iran | 6 | 613 | 0.9788 % |
| Philippines | 16 | 1690 | 0.9467 % |
| Portugal | 1 | 106 | 0.9434 % |
| Ukraine | 9 | 973 | 0.9250 % |
| Malaysia | 7 | 852 | 0.8216 % |
| Canada | 20 | 2452 | 0.8157 % |
| Vietnam | 5 | 726 | 0.6887 % |
| Indonesia | 10 | 1531 | 0.6532 % |
| Venezuela | 2 | 307 | 0.6515 % |
| Turkey | 1 | 155 | 0.6452 % |
| Argentina | 2 | 316 | 0.6329 % |
| Australia | 7 | 1139 | 0.6146 % |
| China | 55 | 9016 | 0.6100 % |
| Bolivia | 2 | 368 | 0.5435 % |
| Peru | 6 | 1156 | 0.5190 % |
| Colombia | 5 | 1006 | 0.4970 % |
| Mexico | 7 | 1434 | 0.4881 % |
| Spain | 6 | 1622 | 0.3699 % |
| India | 18 | 5460 | 0.3297 % |
| Brazil | 8 | 2805 | 0.2852 % |
| Chile | 2 | 778 | 0.2571 % |
| Romania | 1 | 393 | 0.2545 % |
| Israel | 1 | 452 | 0.2212 % |
| Tunisia | 0 | 106 | 0.0000 % |
| Iceland | 0 | 23 | 0.0000 % |
| United Arab Emirates | 0 | 8 | 0.0000 % |
| Egypt | 0 | 2 | 0.0000 % |
| Kazakhstan | 0 | 19 | 0.0000 % |
| Luxembourg | 0 | 8 | 0.0000 % |
| Macedonia | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Croatia | 0 | 70 | 0.0000 % |
| Mongolia | 0 | 74 | 0.0000 % |
| Mauritius | 0 | 2 | 0.0000 % |
| Moldova | 0 | 62 | 0.0000 % |
| Bangladesh | 0 | 6 | 0.0000 % |
| Pakistan | 0 | 12 | 0.0000 % |
| Latvia | 0 | 72 | 0.0000 % |
| Aruba | 0 | 3 | 0.0000 % |
| Uruguay | 0 | 169 | 0.0000 % |
| Afghanistan | 0 | 2 | 0.0000 % |
| Costa Rica | 0 | 2 | 0.0000 % |
| Algeria | 0 | 93 | 0.0000 % |
| Armenia | 0 | 9 | 0.0000 % |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 0 | 34 | 0.0000 % |
| Georgia | 0 | 42 | 0.0000 % |
| Guatemala | 0 | 406 | 0.0000 % |
| Kosovo | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Cyprus | 0 | 5 | 0.0000 % |
| Albania | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Andorra | 0 | 25 | 0.0000 % |
| Paraguay | 0 | 64 | 0.0000 % |
| Zimbabwe | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Senegal | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Montenegro | 0 | 3 | 0.0000 % |
| Zambia | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Ecuador | 0 | 135 | 0.0000 % |
| Palestine | 0 | 2 | 0.0000 % |
| Nepal | 0 | 52 | 0.0000 % |
| Jamaica | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Nicaragua | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Monaco | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Sudan | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Angola | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Malawi | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Haiti | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Samoa | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Bahrain | 0 | 2 | 0.0000 % |
| Honduras | 0 | 2 | 0.0000 % |
| Syria | 0 | 2 | 0.0000 % |
| Liechtenstein | 0 | 2 | 0.0000 % |
| Suriname | 0 | 4 | 0.0000 % |
| Namibia | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Uzbekistan | 0 | 3 | 0.0000 % |
| Oman | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Kuwait | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Iraq | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Dominican Republic | 0 | 301 | 0.0000 % |
| Puerto Rico | 0 | 6 | 0.0000 % |
| Slovakia | 0 | 85 | 0.0000 % |
| Cote d_Ivoire | 0 | 2 | 0.0000 % |
| South Africa | 0 | 521 | 0.0000 % |
| Serbia | 0 | 95 | 0.0000 % |
| Azerbaijan | 0 | 32 | 0.0000 % |
| El Salvador | 0 | 104 | 0.0000 % |
| Cuba | 0 | 6 | 0.0000 % |
| Macau | 0 | 13 | 0.0000 % |
| Lebanon | 0 | 6 | 0.0000 % |
| Sri Lanka | 0 | 6 | 0.0000 % |
| Morocco | 0 | 24 | 0.0000 % |
| Estonia | 0 | 64 | 0.0000 % |
| Nigeria | 0 | 6 | 0.0000 % |
| Belize | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| New Zealand | 0 | 287 | 0.0000 % |
| Jordan | 0 | 8 | 0.0000 % |
| Saudi Arabia | 0 | 5 | 0.0000 % |
 
obelisk477 said:
Is there a theoretical maximum for the possible number of people who have no nemeses? Too tired to think about it
Click to expand...
I'm pretty sure there is.

If you can only compete in one event, then there is a limit of 33 (18 single + 15 average).
If you can compete in two events, then there is a limit of 1093 (((33+32+31...3+2+1)x2)+33)
If that stands, as you expand the number of events that a person can compete in, the limit should expand also, but it would get really enormous.

Can someone who knows what they are talking about double check me?
 
Last edited:
GenTheThief said:
I'm pretty sure there is.

If you can only compete in one event, then there is a limit of 33 (18 single + 15 average).
If you can compete in two events, then there is a limit of like (33+(32+31..3+2+1)x2=1093) or something.
If that stands, as you expand the number of events that a person can compete in, the limit should expand also, but it would get really enormous.

Can someone who knows what they are talking about double check me?
Click to expand...

I guess you'd also have to take into account the fact that, if you have an average in anything, you by default have a single, and have therefore competed in at least 'two' events
 
obelisk477 said:
I guess you'd also have to take into account the fact that, if you have an average in anything, you by default have a single, and have therefore competed in at least 'two' events
Click to expand...
Right... didn't think about that...

Well, my point still stands, there should be a theoretical maximum limit to the number of people with no nemeses.
 
GenTheThief said:
I'm pretty sure there is.

If you can only compete in one event, then there is a limit of 33 (18 single + 15 average).
If you can compete in two events, then there is a limit of 1093 (((33+32+31...3+2+1)x2)+33)
If that stands, as you expand the number of events that a person can compete in, the limit should expand also, but it would get really enormous.

Can someone who knows what they are talking about double check me?
Click to expand...
If theres only 2 events there can be as many people as you want with no nemeses

Lets say 100 people

Person 1 is #1 at 3x3 but #100 at 2x2
Person 2 is #2 at 3x3 but #99 at 2x2
...
Person 99 is 99 at 3x3 but 2 at 2x2
Person 100 is 100 at 3x3 but 1 at 2x2

So nobody nemesises anybody and this idea can be extended to infinity.

You can do something similar with any number of events (except 1 ofc)

EDIT: also you can just have everybody be tied at every event so nobody has nemeses
 
Last edited:
Rcuber123 said:
Country | Having sub 10 average | Having average | Ratio |
|------------------------|---------------|----------------|--------------|
| Slovenia | 3 | 72 | 4.1667 % |
| Bulgaria | 1 | 24 | 4.1667 % |
| Greece | 4 | 127 | 3.1496 % |
| Ireland | 2 | 69 | 2.8986 % |
| Czech Republic | 4 | 150 | 2.6667 % |
| Lithuania | 1 | 46 | 2.1739 % |
| Korea | 22 | 1035 | 2.1256 % |
| Thailand | 7 | 337 | 2.0772 % |
| Germany | 26 | 1306 | 1.9908 % |
| Taiwan | 16 | 905 | 1.7680 % |
| Sweden | 12 | 681 | 1.7621 % |
| United Kingdom | 12 | 714 | 1.6807 % |
| Austria | 2 | 119 | 1.6807 % |
| Japan | 18 | 1143 | 1.5748 % |
| Switzerland | 4 | 256 | 1.5625 % |
| Poland | 31 | 2039 | 1.5204 % |
| Russia | 19 | 1324 | 1.4350 % |
| Singapore | 5 | 355 | 1.4085 % |
| Belgium | 3 | 221 | 1.3575 % |
| Italy | 8 | 605 | 1.3223 % |
| Finland | 3 | 236 | 1.2712 % |
| Netherlands | 5 | 395 | 1.2658 % |
| Hungary | 7 | 593 | 1.1804 % |
| France | 16 | 1384 | 1.1561 % |
| Belarus | 3 | 293 | 1.0239 % |
| Denmark | 3 | 297 | 1.0101 % |
| Norway | 4 | 398 | 1.0050 % |
| Hong Kong | 3 | 302 | 0.9934 % |
| USA | 134 | 13551 | 0.9889 % |
| Iran | 6 | 613 | 0.9788 % |
| Philippines | 16 | 1690 | 0.9467 % |
| Portugal | 1 | 106 | 0.9434 % |
| Ukraine | 9 | 973 | 0.9250 % |
| Malaysia | 7 | 852 | 0.8216 % |
| Canada | 20 | 2452 | 0.8157 % |
| Vietnam | 5 | 726 | 0.6887 % |
| Indonesia | 10 | 1531 | 0.6532 % |
| Venezuela | 2 | 307 | 0.6515 % |
| Turkey | 1 | 155 | 0.6452 % |
| Argentina | 2 | 316 | 0.6329 % |
| Australia | 7 | 1139 | 0.6146 % |
| China | 55 | 9016 | 0.6100 % |
| Bolivia | 2 | 368 | 0.5435 % |
| Peru | 6 | 1156 | 0.5190 % |
| Colombia | 5 | 1006 | 0.4970 % |
| Mexico | 7 | 1434 | 0.4881 % |
| Spain | 6 | 1622 | 0.3699 % |
| India | 18 | 5460 | 0.3297 % |
| Brazil | 8 | 2805 | 0.2852 % |
| Chile | 2 | 778 | 0.2571 % |
| Romania | 1 | 393 | 0.2545 % |
| Israel | 1 | 452 | 0.2212 % |
| Tunisia | 0 | 106 | 0.0000 % |
| Iceland | 0 | 23 | 0.0000 % |
| United Arab Emirates | 0 | 8 | 0.0000 % |
| Egypt | 0 | 2 | 0.0000 % |
| Kazakhstan | 0 | 19 | 0.0000 % |
| Luxembourg | 0 | 8 | 0.0000 % |
| Macedonia | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Croatia | 0 | 70 | 0.0000 % |
| Mongolia | 0 | 74 | 0.0000 % |
| Mauritius | 0 | 2 | 0.0000 % |
| Moldova | 0 | 62 | 0.0000 % |
| Bangladesh | 0 | 6 | 0.0000 % |
| Pakistan | 0 | 12 | 0.0000 % |
| Latvia | 0 | 72 | 0.0000 % |
| Aruba | 0 | 3 | 0.0000 % |
| Uruguay | 0 | 169 | 0.0000 % |
| Afghanistan | 0 | 2 | 0.0000 % |
| Costa Rica | 0 | 2 | 0.0000 % |
| Algeria | 0 | 93 | 0.0000 % |
| Armenia | 0 | 9 | 0.0000 % |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 0 | 34 | 0.0000 % |
| Georgia | 0 | 42 | 0.0000 % |
| Guatemala | 0 | 406 | 0.0000 % |
| Kosovo | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Cyprus | 0 | 5 | 0.0000 % |
| Albania | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Andorra | 0 | 25 | 0.0000 % |
| Paraguay | 0 | 64 | 0.0000 % |
| Zimbabwe | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Senegal | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Montenegro | 0 | 3 | 0.0000 % |
| Zambia | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Ecuador | 0 | 135 | 0.0000 % |
| Palestine | 0 | 2 | 0.0000 % |
| Nepal | 0 | 52 | 0.0000 % |
| Jamaica | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Nicaragua | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Monaco | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Sudan | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Angola | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Malawi | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Haiti | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Samoa | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Bahrain | 0 | 2 | 0.0000 % |
| Honduras | 0 | 2 | 0.0000 % |
| Syria | 0 | 2 | 0.0000 % |
| Liechtenstein | 0 | 2 | 0.0000 % |
| Suriname | 0 | 4 | 0.0000 % |
| Namibia | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Uzbekistan | 0 | 3 | 0.0000 % |
| Oman | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Kuwait | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Iraq | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Dominican Republic | 0 | 301 | 0.0000 % |
| Puerto Rico | 0 | 6 | 0.0000 % |
| Slovakia | 0 | 85 | 0.0000 % |
| Cote d_Ivoire | 0 | 2 | 0.0000 % |
| South Africa | 0 | 521 | 0.0000 % |
| Serbia | 0 | 95 | 0.0000 % |
| Azerbaijan | 0 | 32 | 0.0000 % |
| El Salvador | 0 | 104 | 0.0000 % |
| Cuba | 0 | 6 | 0.0000 % |
| Macau | 0 | 13 | 0.0000 % |
| Lebanon | 0 | 6 | 0.0000 % |
| Sri Lanka | 0 | 6 | 0.0000 % |
| Morocco | 0 | 24 | 0.0000 % |
| Estonia | 0 | 64 | 0.0000 % |
| Nigeria | 0 | 6 | 0.0000 % |
| Belize | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| New Zealand | 0 | 287 | 0.0000 % |
| Jordan | 0 | 8 | 0.0000 % |
| Saudi Arabia | 0 | 5 | 0.0000 % |
Click to expand...
I meant how many sub-10 solvers, not percentage.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Minetoucubing
Odd or fake QJ megaminx?
Replies
0
Views
188
Minetoucubing
Minetoucubing
MrCubert
SS Oddballs Redemption 2026
Replies
2
Views
431
MrCubert
MrCubert
J
Special Characters in my name appear odd in the weekly competitions
Replies
0
Views
484
J:org
J
D
reduction parity on odd cubes vs even cubes
Replies
5
Views
3,040
Christopher Mowla
Christopher Mowla
Discomantis
Need help solving odd swaps on big cubes
Replies
15
Views
2,501
Discomantis
Discomantis
Back
Top