• Welcome to the Speedsolving.com, home of the web's largest puzzle community!
    You are currently viewing our forum as a guest which gives you limited access to join discussions and access our other features.

    Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community of 40,000+ people from around the world today!

    If you are already a member, simply login to hide this message and begin participating in the community!

sam596

Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2012
Messages
89
Location
Lincs, UK
WCA
2015SPEN01
YouTube
Visit Channel
Stumbled upon Rama temmink's WCA-profile and saw that his best 3x3 average ranking and time are the "same", is he the only one or are there more of these?

Changes pretty much everytime a new comp is added, but here they are as of the export I downloaded earlier today.

personID eventid a/s best worldrank
2010TUOZ01 444 average 7947 7947
2017SHAR06 444 average 7947 7947
2015TIAN09 444 average 7947 7947

I did look at this yesterday on an old WCA export and there were a lot more.

SELECT personID, eventid, 'average' `a/s`, best, worldrank from ranksaverage where best=worldrank
UNION
SELECT personID, eventid, 'single' `a/s`, best, worldrank from rankssingle where best=worldrank
 

T1_M0

Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2017
Messages
578
Location
Finland
WCA
2017NORR01
YouTube
Visit Channel
Fastest time taken (in terms of days/years) to complete all WCA events?

Is there anyone who completed all on their first comp?
This is my new goal, to be the fastest one to get a silver membership. :D

6x6 and 7x7 will be the most difficult events, as I don't even have the cubes yet. Feet and clock will be fairly easy to get an average at, I think. Oh yeah, and I've not yet competed in 5x5 either, but that's also easy, I guess.
 
Last edited:

Rcuber123

Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2014
Messages
873
Location
At your house stealing your cubes
WCA
2014TAMI01
Country | Having sub 10 average | Having average | Ratio |
|------------------------|---------------|----------------|--------------|
| Slovenia | 3 | 72 | 4.1667 % |
| Bulgaria | 1 | 24 | 4.1667 % |
| Greece | 4 | 127 | 3.1496 % |
| Ireland | 2 | 69 | 2.8986 % |
| Czech Republic | 4 | 150 | 2.6667 % |
| Lithuania | 1 | 46 | 2.1739 % |
| Korea | 22 | 1035 | 2.1256 % |
| Thailand | 7 | 337 | 2.0772 % |
| Germany | 26 | 1306 | 1.9908 % |
| Taiwan | 16 | 905 | 1.7680 % |
| Sweden | 12 | 681 | 1.7621 % |
| United Kingdom | 12 | 714 | 1.6807 % |
| Austria | 2 | 119 | 1.6807 % |
| Japan | 18 | 1143 | 1.5748 % |
| Switzerland | 4 | 256 | 1.5625 % |
| Poland | 31 | 2039 | 1.5204 % |
| Russia | 19 | 1324 | 1.4350 % |
| Singapore | 5 | 355 | 1.4085 % |
| Belgium | 3 | 221 | 1.3575 % |
| Italy | 8 | 605 | 1.3223 % |
| Finland | 3 | 236 | 1.2712 % |
| Netherlands | 5 | 395 | 1.2658 % |
| Hungary | 7 | 593 | 1.1804 % |
| France | 16 | 1384 | 1.1561 % |
| Belarus | 3 | 293 | 1.0239 % |
| Denmark | 3 | 297 | 1.0101 % |
| Norway | 4 | 398 | 1.0050 % |
| Hong Kong | 3 | 302 | 0.9934 % |
| USA | 134 | 13551 | 0.9889 % |
| Iran | 6 | 613 | 0.9788 % |
| Philippines | 16 | 1690 | 0.9467 % |
| Portugal | 1 | 106 | 0.9434 % |
| Ukraine | 9 | 973 | 0.9250 % |
| Malaysia | 7 | 852 | 0.8216 % |
| Canada | 20 | 2452 | 0.8157 % |
| Vietnam | 5 | 726 | 0.6887 % |
| Indonesia | 10 | 1531 | 0.6532 % |
| Venezuela | 2 | 307 | 0.6515 % |
| Turkey | 1 | 155 | 0.6452 % |
| Argentina | 2 | 316 | 0.6329 % |
| Australia | 7 | 1139 | 0.6146 % |
| China | 55 | 9016 | 0.6100 % |
| Bolivia | 2 | 368 | 0.5435 % |
| Peru | 6 | 1156 | 0.5190 % |
| Colombia | 5 | 1006 | 0.4970 % |
| Mexico | 7 | 1434 | 0.4881 % |
| Spain | 6 | 1622 | 0.3699 % |
| India | 18 | 5460 | 0.3297 % |
| Brazil | 8 | 2805 | 0.2852 % |
| Chile | 2 | 778 | 0.2571 % |
| Romania | 1 | 393 | 0.2545 % |
| Israel | 1 | 452 | 0.2212 % |
| Tunisia | 0 | 106 | 0.0000 % |
| Iceland | 0 | 23 | 0.0000 % |
| United Arab Emirates | 0 | 8 | 0.0000 % |
| Egypt | 0 | 2 | 0.0000 % |
| Kazakhstan | 0 | 19 | 0.0000 % |
| Luxembourg | 0 | 8 | 0.0000 % |
| Macedonia | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Croatia | 0 | 70 | 0.0000 % |
| Mongolia | 0 | 74 | 0.0000 % |
| Mauritius | 0 | 2 | 0.0000 % |
| Moldova | 0 | 62 | 0.0000 % |
| Bangladesh | 0 | 6 | 0.0000 % |
| Pakistan | 0 | 12 | 0.0000 % |
| Latvia | 0 | 72 | 0.0000 % |
| Aruba | 0 | 3 | 0.0000 % |
| Uruguay | 0 | 169 | 0.0000 % |
| Afghanistan | 0 | 2 | 0.0000 % |
| Costa Rica | 0 | 2 | 0.0000 % |
| Algeria | 0 | 93 | 0.0000 % |
| Armenia | 0 | 9 | 0.0000 % |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 0 | 34 | 0.0000 % |
| Georgia | 0 | 42 | 0.0000 % |
| Guatemala | 0 | 406 | 0.0000 % |
| Kosovo | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Cyprus | 0 | 5 | 0.0000 % |
| Albania | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Andorra | 0 | 25 | 0.0000 % |
| Paraguay | 0 | 64 | 0.0000 % |
| Zimbabwe | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Senegal | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Montenegro | 0 | 3 | 0.0000 % |
| Zambia | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Ecuador | 0 | 135 | 0.0000 % |
| Palestine | 0 | 2 | 0.0000 % |
| Nepal | 0 | 52 | 0.0000 % |
| Jamaica | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Nicaragua | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Monaco | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Sudan | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Angola | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Malawi | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Haiti | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Samoa | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Bahrain | 0 | 2 | 0.0000 % |
| Honduras | 0 | 2 | 0.0000 % |
| Syria | 0 | 2 | 0.0000 % |
| Liechtenstein | 0 | 2 | 0.0000 % |
| Suriname | 0 | 4 | 0.0000 % |
| Namibia | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Uzbekistan | 0 | 3 | 0.0000 % |
| Oman | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Kuwait | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Iraq | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Dominican Republic | 0 | 301 | 0.0000 % |
| Puerto Rico | 0 | 6 | 0.0000 % |
| Slovakia | 0 | 85 | 0.0000 % |
| Cote d_Ivoire | 0 | 2 | 0.0000 % |
| South Africa | 0 | 521 | 0.0000 % |
| Serbia | 0 | 95 | 0.0000 % |
| Azerbaijan | 0 | 32 | 0.0000 % |
| El Salvador | 0 | 104 | 0.0000 % |
| Cuba | 0 | 6 | 0.0000 % |
| Macau | 0 | 13 | 0.0000 % |
| Lebanon | 0 | 6 | 0.0000 % |
| Sri Lanka | 0 | 6 | 0.0000 % |
| Morocco | 0 | 24 | 0.0000 % |
| Estonia | 0 | 64 | 0.0000 % |
| Nigeria | 0 | 6 | 0.0000 % |
| Belize | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| New Zealand | 0 | 287 | 0.0000 % |
| Jordan | 0 | 8 | 0.0000 % |
| Saudi Arabia | 0 | 5 | 0.0000 % |
 

GenTheSnail

Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2016
Messages
2,249
Location
Illinois, USA
WCA
2016GEEN01
YouTube
Visit Channel
Is there a theoretical maximum for the possible number of people who have no nemeses? Too tired to think about it
I'm pretty sure there is.

If you can only compete in one event, then there is a limit of 33 (18 single + 15 average).
If you can compete in two events, then there is a limit of 1093 (((33+32+31...3+2+1)x2)+33)
If that stands, as you expand the number of events that a person can compete in, the limit should expand also, but it would get really enormous.

Can someone who knows what they are talking about double check me?
 
Last edited:

obelisk477

Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2010
Messages
1,144
Location
Raleigh, NC
WCA
2009BATT01
YouTube
Visit Channel
I'm pretty sure there is.

If you can only compete in one event, then there is a limit of 33 (18 single + 15 average).
If you can compete in two events, then there is a limit of like (33+(32+31..3+2+1)x2=1093) or something.
If that stands, as you expand the number of events that a person can compete in, the limit should expand also, but it would get really enormous.

Can someone who knows what they are talking about double check me?

I guess you'd also have to take into account the fact that, if you have an average in anything, you by default have a single, and have therefore competed in at least 'two' events
 

GenTheSnail

Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2016
Messages
2,249
Location
Illinois, USA
WCA
2016GEEN01
YouTube
Visit Channel
I guess you'd also have to take into account the fact that, if you have an average in anything, you by default have a single, and have therefore competed in at least 'two' events
Right... didn't think about that...

Well, my point still stands, there should be a theoretical maximum limit to the number of people with no nemeses.
 

guysensei1

Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2013
Messages
5,143
Location
singapore
WCA
2014WENW01
I'm pretty sure there is.

If you can only compete in one event, then there is a limit of 33 (18 single + 15 average).
If you can compete in two events, then there is a limit of 1093 (((33+32+31...3+2+1)x2)+33)
If that stands, as you expand the number of events that a person can compete in, the limit should expand also, but it would get really enormous.

Can someone who knows what they are talking about double check me?
If theres only 2 events there can be as many people as you want with no nemeses

Lets say 100 people

Person 1 is #1 at 3x3 but #100 at 2x2
Person 2 is #2 at 3x3 but #99 at 2x2
...
Person 99 is 99 at 3x3 but 2 at 2x2
Person 100 is 100 at 3x3 but 1 at 2x2

So nobody nemesises anybody and this idea can be extended to infinity.

You can do something similar with any number of events (except 1 ofc)

EDIT: also you can just have everybody be tied at every event so nobody has nemeses
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jun 2, 2017
Messages
1,778
Location
At home. Where you should be.
Country | Having sub 10 average | Having average | Ratio |
|------------------------|---------------|----------------|--------------|
| Slovenia | 3 | 72 | 4.1667 % |
| Bulgaria | 1 | 24 | 4.1667 % |
| Greece | 4 | 127 | 3.1496 % |
| Ireland | 2 | 69 | 2.8986 % |
| Czech Republic | 4 | 150 | 2.6667 % |
| Lithuania | 1 | 46 | 2.1739 % |
| Korea | 22 | 1035 | 2.1256 % |
| Thailand | 7 | 337 | 2.0772 % |
| Germany | 26 | 1306 | 1.9908 % |
| Taiwan | 16 | 905 | 1.7680 % |
| Sweden | 12 | 681 | 1.7621 % |
| United Kingdom | 12 | 714 | 1.6807 % |
| Austria | 2 | 119 | 1.6807 % |
| Japan | 18 | 1143 | 1.5748 % |
| Switzerland | 4 | 256 | 1.5625 % |
| Poland | 31 | 2039 | 1.5204 % |
| Russia | 19 | 1324 | 1.4350 % |
| Singapore | 5 | 355 | 1.4085 % |
| Belgium | 3 | 221 | 1.3575 % |
| Italy | 8 | 605 | 1.3223 % |
| Finland | 3 | 236 | 1.2712 % |
| Netherlands | 5 | 395 | 1.2658 % |
| Hungary | 7 | 593 | 1.1804 % |
| France | 16 | 1384 | 1.1561 % |
| Belarus | 3 | 293 | 1.0239 % |
| Denmark | 3 | 297 | 1.0101 % |
| Norway | 4 | 398 | 1.0050 % |
| Hong Kong | 3 | 302 | 0.9934 % |
| USA | 134 | 13551 | 0.9889 % |
| Iran | 6 | 613 | 0.9788 % |
| Philippines | 16 | 1690 | 0.9467 % |
| Portugal | 1 | 106 | 0.9434 % |
| Ukraine | 9 | 973 | 0.9250 % |
| Malaysia | 7 | 852 | 0.8216 % |
| Canada | 20 | 2452 | 0.8157 % |
| Vietnam | 5 | 726 | 0.6887 % |
| Indonesia | 10 | 1531 | 0.6532 % |
| Venezuela | 2 | 307 | 0.6515 % |
| Turkey | 1 | 155 | 0.6452 % |
| Argentina | 2 | 316 | 0.6329 % |
| Australia | 7 | 1139 | 0.6146 % |
| China | 55 | 9016 | 0.6100 % |
| Bolivia | 2 | 368 | 0.5435 % |
| Peru | 6 | 1156 | 0.5190 % |
| Colombia | 5 | 1006 | 0.4970 % |
| Mexico | 7 | 1434 | 0.4881 % |
| Spain | 6 | 1622 | 0.3699 % |
| India | 18 | 5460 | 0.3297 % |
| Brazil | 8 | 2805 | 0.2852 % |
| Chile | 2 | 778 | 0.2571 % |
| Romania | 1 | 393 | 0.2545 % |
| Israel | 1 | 452 | 0.2212 % |
| Tunisia | 0 | 106 | 0.0000 % |
| Iceland | 0 | 23 | 0.0000 % |
| United Arab Emirates | 0 | 8 | 0.0000 % |
| Egypt | 0 | 2 | 0.0000 % |
| Kazakhstan | 0 | 19 | 0.0000 % |
| Luxembourg | 0 | 8 | 0.0000 % |
| Macedonia | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Croatia | 0 | 70 | 0.0000 % |
| Mongolia | 0 | 74 | 0.0000 % |
| Mauritius | 0 | 2 | 0.0000 % |
| Moldova | 0 | 62 | 0.0000 % |
| Bangladesh | 0 | 6 | 0.0000 % |
| Pakistan | 0 | 12 | 0.0000 % |
| Latvia | 0 | 72 | 0.0000 % |
| Aruba | 0 | 3 | 0.0000 % |
| Uruguay | 0 | 169 | 0.0000 % |
| Afghanistan | 0 | 2 | 0.0000 % |
| Costa Rica | 0 | 2 | 0.0000 % |
| Algeria | 0 | 93 | 0.0000 % |
| Armenia | 0 | 9 | 0.0000 % |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 0 | 34 | 0.0000 % |
| Georgia | 0 | 42 | 0.0000 % |
| Guatemala | 0 | 406 | 0.0000 % |
| Kosovo | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Cyprus | 0 | 5 | 0.0000 % |
| Albania | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Andorra | 0 | 25 | 0.0000 % |
| Paraguay | 0 | 64 | 0.0000 % |
| Zimbabwe | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Senegal | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Montenegro | 0 | 3 | 0.0000 % |
| Zambia | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Ecuador | 0 | 135 | 0.0000 % |
| Palestine | 0 | 2 | 0.0000 % |
| Nepal | 0 | 52 | 0.0000 % |
| Jamaica | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Nicaragua | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Monaco | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Sudan | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Angola | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Malawi | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Haiti | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Samoa | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Bahrain | 0 | 2 | 0.0000 % |
| Honduras | 0 | 2 | 0.0000 % |
| Syria | 0 | 2 | 0.0000 % |
| Liechtenstein | 0 | 2 | 0.0000 % |
| Suriname | 0 | 4 | 0.0000 % |
| Namibia | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Uzbekistan | 0 | 3 | 0.0000 % |
| Oman | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Kuwait | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Iraq | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| Dominican Republic | 0 | 301 | 0.0000 % |
| Puerto Rico | 0 | 6 | 0.0000 % |
| Slovakia | 0 | 85 | 0.0000 % |
| Cote d_Ivoire | 0 | 2 | 0.0000 % |
| South Africa | 0 | 521 | 0.0000 % |
| Serbia | 0 | 95 | 0.0000 % |
| Azerbaijan | 0 | 32 | 0.0000 % |
| El Salvador | 0 | 104 | 0.0000 % |
| Cuba | 0 | 6 | 0.0000 % |
| Macau | 0 | 13 | 0.0000 % |
| Lebanon | 0 | 6 | 0.0000 % |
| Sri Lanka | 0 | 6 | 0.0000 % |
| Morocco | 0 | 24 | 0.0000 % |
| Estonia | 0 | 64 | 0.0000 % |
| Nigeria | 0 | 6 | 0.0000 % |
| Belize | 0 | 1 | 0.0000 % |
| New Zealand | 0 | 287 | 0.0000 % |
| Jordan | 0 | 8 | 0.0000 % |
| Saudi Arabia | 0 | 5 | 0.0000 % |
I meant how many sub-10 solvers, not percentage.
 
Top