• Welcome to SpeedSolving.com — the world’s largest puzzle community!

    You’re currently browsing as a guest, which means you have limited access to discussions, resources, member profiles, and community features.

    Join 50,000+ cubers and puzzle enthusiasts from around the world to ask questions, share solves, improve faster, and be part of the community.

    Registration is free, fast, and easy — create your account today.

    Already a member? Log in here to hide this message and start participating.
Hi Guys, I was doing some PLL algorithms with my left hand and for one of them, it went into a different PLL algorithm. Can you guys tell me if this is an already known algorithm? Thanks.

The algorithm I did is

L U2 L' U2 L F' L' U' L U L F L2 U
 
Hi Guys, I was doing some PLL algorithms with my left hand and for one of them, it went into a different PLL algorithm. Can you guys tell me if this is an already known algorithm? Thanks.

The algorithm I did is

L U2 L' U2 L F' L' U' L U L F L2 U
It's an Ra-Perm alg.
The alg is just the left-handed version of the standard Rb-Perm.
 
Pure opposite flip (UL and UR):
R u R U R' (u' U') R2 U2 R U' R' U' R

About as fast as M' U2 M U [R' F' R, S] for me, and a lot faster than the MU ones.
I still use the RUu alg for OH and 2H, but I switched to an RrU alg for big cubes… which still kinda sucked, so I went looking for an RUF alg. This one seems nice (and it didn't even take long to find):
R U' R' F U R2 U' R' F' R' U' R U R U R2'

Regripless, starting and ending with thumb on bottom. The F' is kinda unreliable, though. (All the other 16-move RUF algs require either regrips or even more unreliable fingertricks.)
 
I still use the RUu alg for OH and 2H, but I switched to an RrU alg for big cubes… which still kinda sucked, so I went looking for an RUF alg. This one seems nice (and it didn't even take long to find):
R U' R' F U R2 U' R' F' R' U' R U R U R2'

Regripless, starting and ending with thumb on bottom. The F' is kinda unreliable, though. (All the other 16-move RUF algs require either regrips or even more unreliable fingertricks.)
Love this algorithm but what is the user in a standard 3x3 solve please?

Sent from my CLT-L09 using Tapatalk
 
P perms ("K perm" on the wiki):
bar on back, square on left: R U' L U2 R' U 3r' r2 U2 r2 u2 2R2 u2 (x)
bar on back, square on right: L' U R' U2 L U' R (l' r') U2 r2 u2 2R2 u2 (x') or maybe bar on front, square on left: R' U L' U2 R U' 3r r2 U2 r2 u2 2R2 u2 (x')

The first one is around half a second faster than the standard Jb + opp for me. Haven't seriously drilled the second one yet, but it looks promising. There are bad regrips in both of these algs, but these are so much shorter. Is that enough to compensate for the regrips? Sure is for me, maybe not for you, but give them a shot anyway.

Algs adapted from the wiki page, originally credited to Clément Gallet.
---
Of course you can also solve the B/D perms ("P perm" on the wiki) with variants of the above:

Da: R' U L' U2 R U' 3r B r2 U2 r2 u2 2R2 u2 (x')
Db: R U' L U2 R' U 3r' F r2 U2 r2 u2 2R2 u2 (x)
Ba: (r l) U2 r2 u2 2R2 u2 F 3r U' R U2 L' U R'
Bb: (r' l') U2 r2 u2 2R2 u2 B 3r' U R' U2 L U' R

Optimal for these is apparently 14 moves when restricted to u2/r2/f2, but the 14-move alg doesn't look great and is also longer in QTM. (Also, bless SiGN notation; Singmaster notation is so annoying to read.)
---
Some years ago I posted this alg for X perm (it's on the wiki too):
Uw2 Rw2 U2 Rw2 R' D R' U' R (U2 D') R' D' R U2 R' (U' D) Rw2 Uw2

I no longer use this alg. The (U' D) Rw2 is too risky, and trying to keep the rarest PLL case in muscle memory when I don't even practise 444 that much seems silly. The alg I now use for this case is the one I posted on the previous page of this thread, which is also usable on 666.
---
(2020-04-30)
Another regripless X perm, this time from combining the above ideas, albeit with crappy F moves all over:
r2 U2 r2 u2 2R2 u' F' U F U' F R2 F' U F' U' F U R2 u' (21f, 29q)
You can mirror this and insert a rotation to make it RUFy, but then you'd get F2s, which might be even worse.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top