JustinTimeCuber
Legend
I do, just because.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

I do, just because.
Link to his sheet?According to his PB's sheet, Feliks just got the first sub2 ever on a 7x7: 1:59.86.
I think that was one of the most impressive barriers ever broken.
If you can solve a 4x4 then 5x5 shouldn't be too much problem. Bigger sizes are pretty much just more of the same thing. Centers get a bit harder but the concepts are all the same and odd sizes have fewer parity issues. You can do it
If you haven't done 4x4 yet, it's done by reducing it into a 3x3 by matching up multiple pieces into one larger one. The added bits are:
1. Solve centers
2. Arrange centers (only on even sized cubes, they might be out-of-order due to no fixed center piece)
3. Pair edges
4. Solve as a normal 3x3
5. Fix any parity issues
Parity comes up when some of the center pieces that LOOK identical are actually misarranged. This causes either two edges to be swapped at the end, or a single edge to be flipped and you have to perform an algorithm to correct these. Starting on 5x5 there is a 3rd type where one edge is a checkerboard and you have to swap the inner or outer edge pieces to correct it. So basically one more algorithm to learn to correct that too.
Starting on size 5 but even moreso on size 6+ it's handy to learn commutators for solving the last two centers.
http://bit.ly/FAZPBSLink to his sheet?
Well scratch that. Now Every PB broken for 4 and 5Just shy of a week of having the magnetic 5 I now have broken every pb with it (Just missing single for the magnetic 4).
Single 1:01.83 (I expect sub 1 soon)
Average of 5: 1:11.32 (I expect sub 1:10 in the next two weeks)
Average of 12: 1:13.07 (Maybe 1:12 this week, but I am sometimes inconsistent)
Global average is around 1:17-1:16