• Welcome to the Speedsolving.com, home of the web's largest puzzle community!
    You are currently viewing our forum as a guest which gives you limited access to join discussions and access our other features.

    Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community of 35,000+ people from around the world today!

    If you are already a member, simply login to hide this message and begin participating in the community!

Damien Porter

Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
92
Location
Wollongong, Australia
WCA
2012PORT01
Case 1 - just do R' F' # F R where # is how you solve
x x o x x
x x x x x
x x x x x
x x x x x
x x o x x

My alg: R' F' M' U M' U M' U M' U2 M' U M' U M' U M' F R

Case 2 - r B simple comutator B' r'

My alg: r B U' R u R' U R u' R' B' r'

Case 3 is ill defined. Is it a 5 cycle or a 3 cycle and a swap.
 
Last edited:

TannerZ

Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2015
Messages
2
ummm i am so new to this :(
case 1: can you explain the # a little more
case 2: what is a comutator?
case 3: can you elaborate on what a 5 cycle or a 3 cycle is?
 

Damien Porter

Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
92
Location
Wollongong, Australia
WCA
2012PORT01
ummm i am so new to this :(
case 1: can you explain the # a little more
case 2: what is a comutator?
case 3: can you elaborate on what a 5 cycle or a 3 cycle is?
Case 1: # stands for the algorithm that you would use to solve that other case. The idea is if you have to flip two adjacent edges, move 1 so they are opposite, flip them, then return the edge to where it belongs.

Case 2: To understand comutators have a look here at our wiki.

Case 3: a 5 cycle is where you move piece 1 >2>3>4>5>1. This creates a cycle with 5 pieces. In general an n cycle is piece 1>2>...>n>1. You did not say weather case 3 was a 5 cycle or a 3 cycle and a 2 cycle. Even though both pieces that have to move to the right may have the same color, there are unique pieces and must go to the right spot.

Also for cases 1 and 2 I did provide algorithms that could be used.
 

Torch

Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2013
Messages
1,441
Location
Austell, GA, USA
WCA
2014GOSL01
YouTube
channel/UC9uTb1qyRStw1KjP832V_Tw
So I measured my splits for 5 5x5 solves, averaged them, and got this:

F2C: 18 (0:18)
L4C: 23 (0:41)
F8E: 53 (1:34)
L4E: 21 (1:55)
3x3: 21 (2:16)

The first time is the number of seconds each step takes, and the time in parentheses is the total elapsed when each step is finished. I average about 2:15-2:20. What steps should I work on?
 

penguinz7

Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2013
Messages
894
Location
AB, Canada
WCA
2015RAME01
So I measured my splits for 5 5x5 solves, averaged them, and got this:

F2C: 18 (0:18)
L4C: 23 (0:41)
F8E: 53 (1:34)
L4E: 21 (1:55)
3x3: 21 (2:16)

The first time is the number of seconds each step takes, and the time in parentheses is the total elapsed when each step is finished. I average about 2:15-2:20. What steps should I work on?
Probably just practice whole solves. Nothing really stands out to me as slow. Maybe your centers, but I don't really know.
 

ryanj92

Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2011
Messages
1,574
Location
Sheffield, UK
WCA
2012JONE03
YouTube
forty3quintillion
So I measured my splits for 5 5x5 solves, averaged them, and got this:

F2C: 18 (0:18)
L4C: 23 (0:41)
F8E: 53 (1:34)
L4E: 21 (1:55)
3x3: 21 (2:16)

The first time is the number of seconds each step takes, and the time in parentheses is the total elapsed when each step is finished. I average about 2:15-2:20. What steps should I work on?
21 for 3x3x3 stage seems quite slow, considering your 3x3x3 times...
i think your balance between centres and edges times is okay, 21 for l4e is pretty slow though, maybe you need to work on efficiency there?
 

Torch

Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2013
Messages
1,441
Location
Austell, GA, USA
WCA
2014GOSL01
YouTube
channel/UC9uTb1qyRStw1KjP832V_Tw
21 for 3x3x3 stage seems quite slow, considering your 3x3x3 times...
i think your balance between centres and edges times is okay, 21 for l4e is pretty slow though, maybe you need to work on efficiency there?

I think the 3x3 stage times can be explained by a combination of having to make a cross without inspection, 5x5s being harder to turn than 3x3s, and my 5x5 in particular being really bad. I'll work on it though.

I just do a whole lot of "slice over, R U R' F R' F' R, slice back" for L4E. Also I have to do the 4x4 parity alg half the time. Is there any way to improve that?

I'll upload a video possibly tonight.
 

ryanj92

Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2011
Messages
1,574
Location
Sheffield, UK
WCA
2012JONE03
YouTube
forty3quintillion
I think the 3x3 stage times can be explained by a combination of having to make a cross without inspection, 5x5s being harder to turn than 3x3s, and my 5x5 in particular being really bad. I'll work on it though.

I just do a whole lot of "slice over, R U R' F R' F' R, slice back" for L4E. Also I have to do the 4x4 parity alg half the time. Is there any way to improve that?

I'll upload a video possibly tonight.
it's probably worth learning a few more l2e algs! i think most of them are very good (or at least, considerably better than setting up to the common parity and then solving that) :)
also, M' U2 M is super useful for l4e, especially if nothing's paired at the beginning
 

Torch

Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2013
Messages
1,441
Location
Austell, GA, USA
WCA
2014GOSL01
YouTube
channel/UC9uTb1qyRStw1KjP832V_Tw
it's probably worth learning a few more l2e algs! i think most of them are very good (or at least, considerably better than setting up to the common parity and then solving that) :)
also, M' U2 M is super useful for l4e, especially if nothing's paired at the beginning
Definitely going to start those L2E algs, I just found some of them are algs I already know, like the 4BLD wing parity alg.

And here's a video:

 
Last edited by a moderator:

joshsailscga

Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2014
Messages
911
Location
Maryland, USA
WCA
2014MORR01
So I measured my splits for 5 5x5 solves, averaged them, and got this:

F2C: 18 (0:18)
L4C: 23 (0:41)
F8E: 53 (1:34)
L4E: 21 (1:55)
3x3: 21 (2:16)

The first time is the number of seconds each step takes, and the time in parentheses is the total elapsed when each step is finished. I average about 2:15-2:20. What steps should I work on?
I saw your solve video you put up as well; centers are fine for your averages, I have 30-35 second centers and a sub-1:55 global average.
I haven't separated my splits for F8E and L4E, but I'm around 50-55 for all 12 together, and I would guess I'm around 15ish on L4E.
Definitely learn those L2E algs, other than that I can't offer much advice as my L4E is really bad.
If you are trying to get serious at 5x5, get a Yuxin. It is so much better than a SS or Aochuang and less than half the price of a Huachuang. That should really cut your 3x3 stage, I'm around 20-21 with a Yuxin while averaging barely sub-15 on normal 3x3.
To wrap up, though, at this point your best bet besides some L2E algs is just to invest time in solves. I cut down to around 2:00 flat without focusing on anything or learning any sort of L2C or L2E.
 

DELToS

Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2015
Messages
292
Location
Probably on my laptop
I did a 5x5 solve that was about what I average (3:05.20) and here are my splits for that solve:

F2C: 29.94
L4C: 30.02
F8E: 1:08.36
L4E: 28.33
3x3: 37.55

What should I improve on? All these steps are also about what I average on them.
Cube: Yuxin
 

qwertycuber

Member
Joined
May 3, 2015
Messages
239
Location
Ottawa, Ontario Canada
YouTube
channel/UCUQpbAy41phl81MasPeL7Hg
I did a 5x5 solve that was about what I average (3:05.20) and here are my splits for that solve:

F2C: 29.94
L4C: 30.02
F8E: 1:08.36
L4E: 28.33
3x3: 37.55

What should I improve on? All these steps are also about what I average on them.
Cube: Yuxin
It seems as though you need to improve on the centers. ON the F2C, I try to solve both centers at once.
 

unsolved

Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2014
Messages
566
Location
Doylestown, PA
I decided to add "stage solving" to my 5x5x5 brute force solver. So the reduction method solves centers first. Rather than code it to build blocks, I wrote code to have the program pre-solve every possible arrangement of exchanging up to 4 centers simultaneously, ignoring what happens to the edges and corners.



I don't know if any of these oddball Algs would be of interest to the group. I can guarantee each is the shortest number of moves required to do any of these center swaps.

Edit: For example, the longest center solve for 3 centers exchanges between the top and front faces requires 11 turns:

https://alg.cubing.net/?type=alg&puzzle=5x5x5&alg=2R_U2_2L-_U_2R-_3F_R2_3F-_2L2_F_2L-

There are several that take this long, but none longer. If someone has a faster solution for the white and green centers only, please let me know.

Edit 2: The program finished the 4 centers vs. 4 centers positions, and now is working on 5 against 5:


Amazingly, most of the 5 center positions can be solved in 10 moves or fewer. The one above is solved by:

U 2R U' 3R U 3R' U' 2R2 F' 2R

https://alg.cubing.net/?type=alg&puzzle=5x5x5&alg=U_2R_U-_3R_U_3R-_U-_2R2_F-_2R
 
Last edited:

PJKCuber

Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2014
Messages
951
Location
Pune,India
WCA
2014KULK02
Text

www.BigCubes.com/5x5x5


Algs

Meep
Last Two Centers
Last Two Edges

Kirjava
K4 LL <-- parity algs for last two edges


Videos

Erik Akkersdijk
[YouTubeHD]B6hmvCbNkpg[/YouTubeHD]
LanceTheBlueKnight
[YouTubeHD]BQhlj4SZGTo[/YouTubeHD]
RobH0629
[YouTubeHD]44G7P-Q5E94[/YouTubeHD]
Dan Cohen
[YouTubeHD]Aa89zl36IZA[/YouTubeHD]
[YouTubeHD]5nW3sLbgCtM[/YouTubeHD]
Kevin Lee
[YouTubeHD]UKdIuZF2IGw[/YouTubeHD]
MeMyselfAndPi
[YouTubeHD]LbPWHLi6jVA[/YouTubeHD]
Feliks Zemdegs
[YouTubeHD]cjTJcUXokmU[/YouTubeHD]
SixSquareFaces
[YouTubeHD]bCpZPUJk_k8[/YouTubeHD]
CuberFelix1996
[YouTubeHD]kVbYCOVU6t4[/YouTubeHD]
TheGbpackr
[YouTubeHD]2ePPikyKei8[/YouTubeHD]
Rob Yau
[YouTubeHD]J3I029cwLHU[/YouTubeHD]
[YouTubeHD]xevxLrEEBJ8[/YouTubeHD]


Original Post:
I need some tips on speedsolving the 5x5. I have been practicing a bit, and I want to start working on tricks to improve my times. If you have any, please let me know. Thanks
The links to the videos don't seem to work.
 
Top