• Welcome to SpeedSolving.com — the world’s largest puzzle community!

    You’re currently browsing as a guest, which means you have limited access to discussions, resources, member profiles, and community features.

    Join 50,000+ cubers and puzzle enthusiasts from around the world to ask questions, share solves, improve faster, and be part of the community.

    Registration is free, fast, and easy — create your account today.

    Already a member? Log in here to hide this message and start participating.
Status
Not open for further replies.
how can i work on mermorizing oll and having better look ahead
For memorising OLL, learn 1-2 per day. There are two things you can do which help: firstly, you can break the algorithm down into "triggers", i.e. common, short sequences of moves, for example R U R' U' or R' F R F'. Secondly, most algorithms involve taking out the FR pair and then moving it around before inserting it again. Some people find it helpful to track where the pair goes. Most people use a combination of these two methods to memorise any algorithms, and these techniques definitely work well for OLL.

There are plenty of resources on looking ahead which you'd be able to find with a quick search, but generally, if you're new to looking ahead, the best thing to do is to turn very slowly, so that you don't need to pause at all. Now this may mean turning at less than 1 TPS, but what's important is that you don't pause. You'll gradually be able to build up your turning speed until your times return to normal.
 
So I just switched to using F2L along with the beginners method, (which is all I know), and my time dramatically increased. From a 50.01 pb, to 1:40s pb, averaging 2:15s with F2L. Is this normal? I’ve only been using it for about a week, and i’ve only been able to solve a cube at all for about a year. Thoughts?
 
So I just switched to using F2L along with the beginners method, (which is all I know), and my time dramatically increased. From a 50.01 pb, to 1:40s pb, averaging 2:15s with F2L. Is this normal? I’ve only been using it for about a week, and i’ve only been able to solve a cube at all for about a year. Thoughts?
Yes you will slow down at first with every new method, but in the end F2L is way faster
 
Once I finish learning full ZBLL, would it be a good choice to learn VHLS from all angles? I don't want to start over with a whole new method (ZZ), as I already average about 13 seconds with CFOP.
If it isn't a good choice, what should I do instead? I will not be learning full ZBLS.
 
Once I finish learning full ZBLL, would it be a good choice to learn VHLS from all angles? I don't want to start over with a whole new method (ZZ), as I already average about 13 seconds with CFOP.
If it isn't a good choice, what should I do instead? I will not be learning full ZBLS.
If you want to learn and consistently use full ZBLL, but don't want to switch to ZZ-a, then the best thing to do is to also learn as much ZBLS as you can. Start with VHLS since many cases will be setups to those, but you'll want to learn more algs eventually. ZBLL is, usually, faster than OLL-PLL, so the more chances you can get to use it, the better.

Although, some ZBLS cases won't be worth using, but ofc there are plenty of ones which are worth learning.

(I don't think 13 is too late to be switching method (I switched at low 13), but of course don't do it if you don't want to!)
 
So I just switched to using F2L along with the beginners method, (which is all I know), and my time dramatically increased. From a 50.01 pb, to 1:40s pb, averaging 2:15s with F2L. Is this normal? I’ve only been using it for about a week, and i’ve only been able to solve a cube at all for about a year. Thoughts?
In time your F2L will get faster. Sometimes if you're learning F2L it might be more helpful/beneficial in the long run to learn intuitive F2L. Just make sure that you understand what's happening when you do an alg to the pieces.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top