Status
Not open for further replies.
Does anyone know how the average move count of summer variation compares to winter variation?
And assuming I magically know all the algs for it, which is probably faster: RUR'+COLL+EPLL or SV+PLL?

Just finished generating my own SV alg set to answer your question, so thanks for the inspiration!

Average movecount for standard WV is 9.22, average movecount for SV is 9.00. And I actually think, with the ones I have at least, that SV+PLL would be faster once incorporated properly.
 
Like a lot of people I am stuck at 20 seconds. I am currently practicing a lot, like 100 solves a day, and I am just wanting some different practice techniques/ ideas for improving. I do slow solves to work on look ahead, practice my cross with my eyes closed, and have even resorted to downloading a metronome on my phone to practice consistent turning.


I am not improving.


If this just means that I am destined to be a 20 second solver for the rest of my life, thats ok. But I will not stop trying. So any advice would be greatly appreciated.
 
Can I buy a replacement tool for the Ganz at a local hardware store. I don't mean the actual Ganz tool. I mean something that could be bought at a hardware store and function the same way. Thanks!
 
Like a lot of people I am stuck at 20 seconds. I am currently practicing a lot, like 100 solves a day, and I am just wanting some different practice techniques/ ideas for improving. I do slow solves to work on look ahead, practice my cross with my eyes closed, and have even resorted to downloading a metronome on my phone to practice consistent turning.


I am not improving.


If this just means that I am destined to be a 20 second solver for the rest of my life, thats ok. But I will not stop trying. So any advice would be greatly appreciated.

you can only be destined at 20s if there's something wrong with your solving.
- bad finger tricks
- terrible algs (bad algs are okay, but terrible algs are nope)
- bad habits on the cube (various)
- inefficient F2L, like really inefficient
- bad method

so you're not destined. trust me. sometimes you'll hit little plateaus that you must overcome, and this is when it gets tricky.
you can go check out my thread, since it doesn't matter what level you are it's always applicable to helping you improve.
https://www.speedsolving.com/forum/...houghts-on-3x3-improvement-progression-(CFOP)
 
Feliks' OLLs?

Guys, someone said that Feliks and other pros either use Cube Explorer or make-up their own OLLs, is that true or do they get them from sites like SS?
 
Like a lot of people I am stuck at 20 seconds. I am currently practicing a lot, like 100 solves a day, and I am just wanting some different practice techniques/ ideas for improving. I do slow solves to work on look ahead, practice my cross with my eyes closed, and have even resorted to downloading a metronome on my phone to practice consistent turning.


I am not improving.


If this just means that I am destined to be a 20 second solver for the rest of my life, thats ok. But I will not stop trying. So any advice would be greatly appreciated.

Come on! You're the Cubeologist! I watch all your videos and you're right now just a little bit ahead of me with your PBs so, please DON'T SAY THAT AGAIN! :)
Well, seriously, I'm suffering the exact same issue since months ago. In fact my progress has always been slow. I started speedcubing like 18 months ago and I'm still struggling with sub-20. Maybe because I'm 44 or maybe because I'm just unskilled, I don't really know.

When I watch your videos I see your turning during LL is faster and more precise than mine so the culprit must still be F2L lookahead. The paramount of what you must be aiming to is that slow solve of 15.x that you showed in your recent "slow solving" video.

But, as smiles has already told you, there are plateaus, and the faster you get, I assume the longer the plateaus. As I said, I have been stuck at 23 (Ao100) for months but, once I studied it carefully, the plateau was in fact a slow slope from high 23s to mid- to low- to high 22s... yeah, over the course of many more moths than I would have liked to, but still a declining slope.

And, all of a sudden, the other day I finally finished working up my "gummified" YJ Sulong (too much weight 3 lube on the pieces, I guess) and it started to feel a bit less gummy. I changed from my previous main (Chilong, Maru lubbed) and, wow! I have more control and as the cube is not as fast I can concentrate better in my lookahead (and I overshoot less as well). So, in the course of this past week, I have improved my long averages almost by a second from very low 22s to low-to-mid 21s.

Somebody told me months ago in this forum: if what you're doing does not work, do something different. So, change cubes, lube them differently, change your training, change to a different puzzle for a while... Just try something different. For what it's worth, apart from the cube change I have started practicing OH, can this be helping my 2H times? I really don't know.

Sorry for the long post but, hey, I don't always have the opportunity to chat with you!!! One last thing, whatever you do, please don't stop speedcubing and don't stop doing your great videos!
 
Last edited:
Like a lot of people I am stuck at 20 seconds. I am currently practicing a lot, like 100 solves a day, and I am just wanting some different practice techniques/ ideas for improving. I do slow solves to work on look ahead, practice my cross with my eyes closed, and have even resorted to downloading a metronome on my phone to practice consistent turning.


I am not improving.


If this just means that I am destined to be a 20 second solver for the rest of my life, thats ok. But I will not stop trying. So any advice would be greatly appreciated.

I am kinda stuck on 25 but I am improving slowly. I know what you mean.
 
I'm a bit confused about the naming of LS + OLL.
what I first understood was that cases where the pair was split is called HLS for hessler, and joined pair was VLS for valk, then OLS is the larger set containing both of them. then there's RLS for Rowe, which should be the same as hessler or HLS, but instead RLS is the same as VLS. what's up with that?
 
I've proposed elsewhere that OLS subsets should be permanently renamed OLS 1 through OLS 42, corresponding to the F2L numbered cases. So WV should be a subset of OLS 1 (VLS), which should be a subset of full OLS. Pass it on!

But to answer your question, HLS and VLS are the right names now. RLS is obsolete
 
Like a lot of people I am stuck at 20 seconds. I am currently practicing a lot, like 100 solves a day, and I am just wanting some different practice techniques/ ideas for improving. I do slow solves to work on look ahead, practice my cross with my eyes closed, and have even resorted to downloading a metronome on my phone to practice consistent turning.


I am not improving.


If this just means that I am destined to be a 20 second solver for the rest of my life, thats ok. But I will not stop trying. So any advice would be greatly appreciated.


Like a lot of people I am stuck at 20 seconds. I am currently practicing a lot, like 100 solves a day, and I am just wanting some different practice techniques/ ideas for improving. I do slow solves to work on look ahead, practice my cross with my eyes closed, and have even resorted to downloading a metronome on my phone to practice consistent turning.


I am not improving.


If this just means that I am destined to be a 20 second solver for the rest of my life, thats ok. But I will not stop trying. So any advice would be greatly appreciated.

Hey Cubeologist!

I reached sub 20 about 4 months ago and here are the things I believe that helped me the most to get there:

1. Watch example solves by fast people like feliks, mats, and the ones on cubing world. This can really contribute to f2l efficiency and good solutions to hard cases. Also for some reason watching it over and over helps me with recognition for look ahead.

2. Know how to solve each f2l case with your eyes closed, this can really help recognition speed and look ahead, since you don't have to think about how you're solving the f2l pair while you're doing it.

3. Don't do slow solves only for look ahead, but use it to try to make your solves as efficient as possible. less cube rotations, less useless turns = better solution to f2l.

4. Work on your tps. Being able to spam tps really helps during last layer and the first part of the final f2l pair. Watching your solves form january, I think that this is a crucial step to you achieving sub 20.

Thanks a lot and I love your videos!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top