uvafan
Veteran
19.61 avg100 with 100 consecutive pll skips
23.72, 14.78, 16.75, 16.76, (29.82), 24.61, 24.26, 15.24, 21.16, 17.16, 18.79, 22.82, (31.02), 21.17, (31.20), 22.74, 19.57, 18.95, 20.59, 18.13, 20.56, 21.81, 20.68, 17.40, 23.54, 23.65, 16.33, 19.75, 15.62, 19.47, 23.78, 17.24, 14.92, 16.57, (13.88), 23.33, 26.83, 23.22, 16.94, 20.30, 23.77, 24.64, 22.82, 17.42, 17.07, 17.40, (39.11), 16.45, 22.53, 20.65, 26.54, (14.19), 15.59, 22.37, 17.51, (14.50), 20.24, 18.39, 18.69, 27.02, 19.90, 21.03, 23.43, 17.22, 21.45, 23.24, (13.84), 17.13, 23.55, 17.90, 21.18, 14.55, 15.87, 19.10, 22.52, 15.95, 15.77, 21.57, 14.52, 19.19, (29.12), 15.78, 19.65, 19.20, 17.19, 21.67, 19.56, 15.58, 19.99, 18.84, 19.98, 16.67, 20.40, 19.25, 16.54, 16.69, 18.81, (13.24), 18.96, 16.81
I developed this extremely complicated function to model and explain my results:
number_of_pll_skips_you'll_get_per_solve = pi / (number_of_oll_cases_you_claim_to_know_beyond_OCLL + pi)
How??
IIRC he uses ZZ so he could easily done ZBLL and do random sunes or something for the cases he doesn't know until he gets one he does.
Did you wake up one day knowing full ZBLL or do you use some kind of intuitive OPLL? Do you influence the LL in any way during F2L?
okso you know how a while ago matt and aznanimedude or however you spell it were working on project pll skip and had x/7 in their signatures? I think that matt either finished or is very close. Not ZBLL. Not intuitive. I think you can figure out the set he's using from those two statements...
oh and also if you watch the vid on his yt channel then you'll see he has video of an avg5 with all pll skips.