• Welcome to SpeedSolving.com — the world’s largest puzzle community!

    You’re currently browsing as a guest, which means you have limited access to discussions, resources, member profiles, and community features.

    Join 50,000+ cubers and puzzle enthusiasts from around the world to ask questions, share solves, improve faster, and be part of the community.

    Registration is free, fast, and easy — create your account today.

    Already a member? Log in here to hide this message and start participating.
Pfft, I just call that Tuesday... though seriously it was only 40 algs and recall is still crappy for a lot of them.

40 is a bit more manageable. But then again, it took like a year for me to learn full OLL so...

How are you able to recognize so many algs? I've tried to learn other algs to supplement OLL and PLL, but I can never recognize them from the masses of other similar cases. You hurt my brain.
 
5.887 D L2 B2 D L2 D' B2 L2 D' F2 D2 R' B' F' L' D F' U2 F2 D' R2
z2 y'
F' B U R2 // Xcross
U' R U2 R' U' R U R' // F2L2
U L U' L' // F2L3
y' R U' R2 F R F' // F2L4
U' r U R' U R U' R' U R U2 r' // OLL
U' R U R' U' R' F R2 U' R' U' R U R' F' U // PLL

50/5.887 = 8.49 TPS, really good for me, probably the best I've reconstructed.
 
I build the "blocks" then do free slice for the f2l and ll edges. Thanks!

I'm basing my method off what I saw in Sam's videos. Although it's likely I'm missing some of his techniques. Anywho...

1. Redux F2L Centers
2. Redux and Solve Star Edges (seems easiest to solve each edge one at a time, rather than 'Redux all 5 first, then do Star')
3. Redux F2L Edges + Corners (creates 1x4 "blocks") + Solve F2L
(F2L is fully solved)
4. Redux S2L Centers
5. Redux S2L + LL Edges
6. S2L + LL (normal Mega method steps)

I was wondering what you meant by "blocks". I don't quite know how to interpret that part of your method. Are you adding a substep between steps 4 and 5 where you only partially solve the S2L centers before reducing the S2L+LL edges?

Is there a Gigaminx Discussion Thread we can take this too?
 
I'm basing my method off what I saw in Sam's videos. Although it's likely I'm missing some of his techniques. Anywho...

1. Redux F2L Centers
2. Redux and Solve Star Edges (seems easiest to solve each edge one at a time, rather than 'Redux all 5 first, then do Star')
3. Redux F2L Edges + Corners (creates 1x4 "blocks") + Solve F2L
(F2L is fully solved)
4. Redux S2L Centers
5. Redux S2L + LL Edges
6. S2L + LL (normal Mega method steps)

I was wondering what you meant by "blocks". I don't quite know how to interpret that part of your method. Are you adding a substep between steps 4 and 5 where you only partially solve the S2L centers before reducing the S2L+LL edges?

Is there a Gigaminx Discussion Thread we can take this too?
Let's take it to a thread.
 
stats: (hide)
number of times: 100/100
best time: 7.64
worst time: 13.81

current mo3: 11.65 (σ = 1.29)
best mo3: 8.49 (σ = 0.55)

current avg5: 11.65 (σ = 1.29)
best avg5: 8.76 (σ = 0.42)

current avg12: 11.29 (σ = 1.05)
best avg12: 9.47 (σ = 0.74)

current avg100: 10.26 (σ = 1.00)
best avg100: 10.26 (σ = 1.00)

session avg: 10.26 (σ = 1.00)
session mean: 10.30
 
Aaaaaah whaaaaaaaaat...

Generated By csTimer on 2001-1-4
avg of 5: 8.76

Time List:
1. (6.93) R' B D2 L2 U' R D' R' B L F2 U' L2 D2 F2 U R2 D' R2 F2 L2
2. (10.83) B2 U' R2 D' F D' L U L R2 B2 U L2 U B2 D B2 D L2 U2
3. 8.88 B2 R2 B U2 B2 R2 D2 R2 B U2 D' L2 D U' L B' U L2 U' F2
4. 9.34 D2 L2 F2 L2 B L2 R2 D2 L2 U2 B2 D B2 U R D B2 D R' F'
5. 8.05 D2 L' F2 L F2 U2 R F2 L R' U' B2 F U' R' U' L2 B U'

I just beat my old pb ao5 by .99 seconds, crazy. Also that's my pb single.
 
Back
Top