Accomplishment Thread

[PianoCube]

I'm now able to do all PLLs sub 2.
Two of the G-perms and the N-perms took 20+ attempts each before I got it. The rest is quite easily sub 2 now.

 

[Divineskulls]

43.78 megaminx single PB
It could have been 2-look LL, but I didn't recognize the oll fast enough, so I just did fruruf OCLL.

The pll was U U2' U2 U' T perm. xD

 

[Iggy]

current avg5: 13.83 (σ = 0.01)

dat consistency

 

[Speedcuber97]

7x7:
Mean of 3: 3:18.77
Avg of 5: 3:19.96
Finally new 7x7 PB`s, still waiting for sub 3 single...

 

[JianhanC]

7x7:
Mean of 3: 3:18.77
Avg of 5: 3:19.96
Finally new 7x7 PB`s, still waiting for sub 3 single...

Niceeee. Definitely an underrated cuber, you are. I've never heard of you till now, regretfully.

And I'm posting here to get to my sig, cause I'm too lazy to go the long way

 

[Username]

7x7:
Mean of 3: 3:18.77
Avg of 5: 3:19.96
Finally new 7x7 PB`s, still waiting for sub 3 single...

Wow! that's 3 times faster than me

 

[Username]

pb avg100 17.89

 

[JianhanC]

5x5: 1:22.21, (1:20.29), (1:26.33), 1:21.93, 1:21.97 = 1:22.04 (σ = 0.15)

wat. O___O consistent and fast, almost as rare as Pikachu sightings. Today was a good day.

 

[TheNextFeliks]

18.22 PB stackmat single. Had a 17.40 but on computer timer. Forced pll skip.

 

[mDiPalma]

10.67 petrus
R F2 D2 L' B2 F2 U2 F' L F D2 U' R' L2 U' B2 R' F U' B' U' F2 B' L F2

 

[TheNextFeliks]

3x3 Sub-25! Broke my barrier!
24.92 ao12
23.13 ao5
20.53 mo3
18.50 single (not PB, see above)

 

[antoineccantin]

3.142 2x2 single Pi

 

[Michael Womack]

3.142 2x2 single Pi

Actually Pi=3.141592

 

[qqwref]

more mouse sim stuff
11:24.391 10x10x10 solve
14:24.968 11x11x11 solve
32:32.921 15x15x15 solve

Actually Pi=3.141592

And what is it rounded to three decimal places....?

 

[ben1996123]

15 puzzle 5.241 single

Actually Pi=3.141592

actually no it dosent, \( \pi \approx 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288419716939937510582097494459230781 \)\( 64062862089986280348253421170679821480865132823066470938446095505822317 \)\( 2535940812848111745028 \), and thats only an approximation which is 0% of the full number of digits (because pi is irrational and \( \lim_{x\rightarrow\infty}\frac{161}{x}=0 \)), so you can't say that pi = 3.141592 because it doesnt, and that would mean that pi is rational and algebraic, or that x - 3.141592 = 0 is not a polynomial. pi is also \( 4\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^n}{2n+1} \), if you want an alternate representation of pi that wont take you forever to type. or 2arccos(0)

 

[Renslay]

You must be fun at parties.

 

[Ollie]

15 puzzle 5.241 single



actually no it dosent, \( \pi \approx 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288419716939937510582097494459230781 \)\( 64062862089986280348253421170679821480865132823066470938446095505822317 \)\( 2535940812848111745028 \), and thats only an approximation which is 0% of the full number of digits (because pi is irrational and \( \lim_{x\rightarrow\infty}\frac{161}{x}=0 \)), so you can't say that pi = 3.141592 because it doesnt, and that would mean that pi is rational and algebraic, or that x - 3.141592 = 0 is not a polynomial. pi is also \( 4\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^n}{2n+1} \), if you want an alternate representation of pi that wont take you forever to type. or 2arccos(0)

I only come on SS for Ben's posts nowadays

 

[ben1996123]

You must be fun at parties.

I don't do parties. pruf: my pony personality test gave me a pinkie pie score of -1. I didn't even know that was possible.

Spoiler

edit:
fun fact: I have never been to a party

 

[qqwref]

NOT DASH ENOUGH

Spoiler

 

[ben1996123]

NOT DASH ENOUGH

Spoiler

ino

i might look through the code and find optimal rainbow dash answers. that way, i can change my IRL personality to be more like rainbow dash. =D

inb4 these posts get deleted