I'm not positive, but I think if you are careful about what you are doing, you can avoid parity on a 5x5. If you can't, you can use the 4x4 OLL Parity to fix it right up (so you don't have to learn anything extra for the 5x5).
I am by no means a big cube expert, I solve them slowly and just for fun =P so I'm fully prepared to be corrected on this. However, I think that you can come across two forms of edge-pairing parity on the 5x5, one of which can be solved with the 4x4 OLL parity alg, the other requires a different alg.

1 _________ 2 ______ 2
2 ___ Or ___ 1 ______ 2
1 _________ 1 ______ 1
 
Yes, but technically it is this:

1 or 2 2
1 or 1 2
1 or 1 1

The 1 in the middle in the first case is just flipped.

There are also combinations of the cases, when the last two pairs look very confusing, but you just have to use both algs.
 
Last edited:
there are 2 methods . reduction and K4 . K4 is much harder and has a lot algorithms but i'm not sure its the fastest .
I suggest reduction
 
there are 2 methods . reduction and K4 . K4 is much harder and has a lot algorithms but i'm not sure its the fastest .
I suggest reduction

It's always fun to act like you know everything in front of somebody which is even more ignorant than you are, right ?

Anyway, reduction, K4 or Yau's method are both very effective.
 
Reduction is a pretty loose classification IMO. There are a number of different approaches which can be used in a reduction-based method - mainly in the choice of edge pairing and 3x3 method used in the final solve.

Technically I do 'reduction' but the edge pairing phase and final solve are much more ZZ-ish than a CFOP-based reduction method: http://www.speedsolving.com/forum/showthread.php?t=23617
 
4x4 edge pairing, best method?

Thought i'd start with some 4x4 practicing, how do you pair up for edges? two at a time or more? do you have any tips/good tuts on utube to help me out?

cheers
 
Back
Top