Why so specific? It really does look like you just want (insignificant) things something to brag about. IMO, the only significant part of your post was that you might be the youngest person to solve a 4x4 BLD.

I was being specific just in case somebody said "i am sub 50 too" but they really aren't equal to or as fast as me. I might as well say at least my speed, but that sounds kind of selfish in a way. And I can personally gaurantee I wasn't bragging. I was looking at age vs speed and thought about making an "unofficial" age vs page. If you don't have anything to say about knowing some young cubers, don't post here. That's all, I am not forcing you to read this because I am "bragging."
 
I was being specific just in case somebody said "i am sub 50 too" but they really aren't equal to or as fast as me. I might as well say at least my speed, but that sounds kind of selfish in a way. And I can personally gaurantee I wasn't bragging.
That's definitely not the way I (and many others) see it, but I'll take you word for it.

If you're interested in when Bernett got his first 4BLD success, you could just personally ask him or his father.
 
I was being specific just in case somebody said "i am sub 50 too" but they really aren't equal to or as fast as me. I might as well say at least my speed, but that sounds kind of selfish in a way. And I can personally gaurantee I wasn't bragging. I was looking at age vs speed and thought about making an "unofficial" age vs page. If you don't have anything to say about knowing some young cubers, don't post here. That's all, I am not forcing you to read this because I am "bragging."

No one cares about unofficial stats, though. I could say I'm one of the youngest sub-10 Skewb solvers, but no one would give a damn.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I would care. But seriously I am no longer arguing.

To be fair, not "no one," but instead almost no one cares about about unofficial times because it's just taking somebody else's word for it. I could say that I have gotten a sub-8 3x3 average, but there's really no evidence to support it. An unofficial age vs. speed page would be practically meaningless. There is a reason why the unofficial pages on speedcubing.com died out. A lot of it had to do with the lack of integrity of those results. There was no way to verify unofficial results.
 
So I was wondering who the youngest and fastest cubers are. Other than wca's age vs speed page, which only compares for at comps, not at home, there is nothing to compare age and speed. Lol maybe I am in one of these? So correct me if I am wrong, but I believe that I might be the youungest cuber to get a:
Sub .55 2x2 Single (.53)
Sub 11.5 3x3 Average of 5 (11.43)
Sub 47 4x4 Single (46.53)
Sub 1:02 4x4 Average (1:01.xx)
Sub 1.01 Magic Average (1.00)
Sub 1 Magic Single (.961)
Sub 1:50 Minutes for 3x3 Blindfolded (1:47.955)
4x4 Blindfolded (Overall youngest)
5x5 Blindfolded (Off by three corners yesterday, will attempt again today.)
And I am 11 years and 20 days old as of this day of this post.
The only 2 that have video proof are the sub 1 magic single (.985, not the .961); the 4BLD single, and the 1:47.955 3x3 Blindfolded. 5x5 Blindfolded will be soon! And I have many averages/singles very close to these that are on camera, so if you are really picky I can upload those to my channel, TheRubiksCard101. Thanks for helping me out, and maybe we'll find the youngest and fastest solvers for every event at one point.

I honestly hope you grow up soon...

Age has almost nothing to do with speed.
 
To be fair, not "no one," but instead almost no one cares about about unofficial times because it's just taking somebody else's word for it. I could say that I have gotten a sub-8 3x3 average, but there's really no evidence to support it. An unofficial age vs. speed page would be practically meaningless. There is a reason why the unofficial pages on speedcubing.com died out. A lot of it had to do with the lack of integrity of those results. There was no way to verify unofficial results.

Finally someone points out the obvious.
 
All results WAS an option before.

I like the 1000 results option but I'd like "the all results" to still be an option.
Before: 100 Persons, All Persons, By Region, 100 Results (Image of Google's cache from just yesterday: http://i.imgur.com/xw1TO.png)
Now: 100 Persons, 1000 Persons, By Region, 100 Results, 1000 Results

All Results was never an option. You may be getting confused between All Persons and All Results, which we have been distinguishing in the last few posts.
 
All Results was never an option. You may be getting confused between All Persons and All Results, which we have been distinguishing in the last few posts.

You are correct, I was referring to all persons indeed.
And I should have read more carefully, Silly me :o

I still want All persons back though.
I found it nice that I could see which people have similar times as myself.

Now I can no longer do this unless I make the top 1000 (or download the WCA results database-)
 
Well this is a pain. Any particular reason All persons was removed? For some events (3x3, 2x2) The vast majority of people now cannot see where they stack up in the world against others around their speed. (It also breaks my sum of ranks script, but that's kind of arbitary :b

EDIT: Nevermind, it can still be accessed, just by putting '&show=All%2BPersons' in the URL instead of '&show=100%2BPersons' or whatever it says. So why has the choice for it been removed?
 
Last edited:
I did this manually, so a may have miscounted, but I think this is right:

The cuber with the most sub-3 official 2x2 averages is Feliks Zemdegs, with 15. In equal 2nd are Christopher Olson, and me (Cameron Stollery), with 14 each. :p And, we all have a 2.99. :)
 
Back
Top