yoinneroid
Veteran
1:19.37, 1:21.10, (1:18.79), (1:40.46), 1:20.60 = 1:20.36 Mega avg5
PB by a bit. Also got a 1:11.82 single, my 2nd best ever.
waaat
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
1:19.37, 1:21.10, (1:18.79), (1:40.46), 1:20.60 = 1:20.36 Mega avg5
PB by a bit. Also got a 1:11.82 single, my 2nd best ever.
waaat
This one is substantially harder:
number of times: 31/31
best time: 17.33
best avg5: 26.81
best avg12: 27.89
1:28.11 5x5 single pb. 1:06 for reduction
Some people don't learn algs, but recognize the CLL case and know what they will get for the upper level PBL. Also, I learned Full CLL before I was sub 7 with Ortega and don't regret, I even learned full EG1, But I forgot half the cases because I don't practice enough. I figured might as well start now, not that I am any good at 2x2.I could predict what the PBL would be a lot of the time which wouldn't be possible without cll, so that is kinda cheatingBut still, don't learn cll at 5 seconds or something like me or else you're wasting time
I also do this, even though I don't know most CLLs except what my OLLs are (and the H cases, I think that's just about it). I the reason why I'm still averaging ~4 with Ortega is that my AUF prediction sucks. How do you predict AUF?Some people don't learn algs, but recognize the CLL case and know what they will get for the upper level PBL.
wat1. 4.42 R D' F2 B L F L' B' D2 B2 U R2 U' R2 D2 L2 D' B2 D
D U R2 U R'
U2 y L U L'
R U2 R2 F R F'
U' R U R' U' R U2 R'fp, should've done U2 R' U2 R U R' U R, would've been 3.xx (maybe UWR?))
U' R' U R' U' R' U' R' U R U R2