Accomplishment Thread

[TheNextFeliks]

NOOOOO DON'T DO IT

60. 14.51 R2 D2 U' L2 B2 D L2 B2 D' L2 D' F D' L U B' D2 B F L D' U
Can't reconstruct, but had last pair skip and an easy ZBLL. Could've been better, but still a good ZZ solve for me.

Why not? I want to be fast. I can be fast at CFOP because I don't need to think as much. I do like M-slices like in roux though.

 

[cubenut99]

number of times: 100/100
best time: 10.46
worst time: 15.88

current avg5: 12.24 (σ = 0.70)
best avg5: 11.50 (σ = 0.29)

current avg12: 12.50 (σ = 0.92)
best avg12: 12.50 (σ = 0.92)

current avg50: 12.99 (σ = 0.93)
best avg50: 12.98 (σ = 0.93)

current avg100: 13.35 (σ = 1.01)
best avg100: 13.35 (σ = 1.01)

session avg: 13.35 (σ = 1.01)
session mean: 13.35

Sub 14 3x3 average of 100. I could die right now and die happy!

 

[yoshinator]

32.98 avg5 on cam. Decent. Failed a little on the last 2 solves.

(30.87), 31.51, 32.66, 34.77, (35.58)

 

[Tim Major]

32.98 avg5 on cam. Decent. Failed a little on the last 2 solves.

(30.87), 31.51, 32.66, 34.77, (35.58)

Almost 30 31 32 33 34 in order

 

[cuboy63]

24.77 PLL time attack

 

[DavidCip86]

1:01.16 4x4 single. Worst A perm EVER, would have been sub 1 easy :-/

 

[yoshinator]

24.77 PLL time attack

Wow...

My accomplishment:

6.63, 8.38, (5.41), 6.20, 6.39, (8.84), 6.59, 6.31, 7.47, 6.42, 7.78, 7.06= 6.92 pyra avg12. Not bad for first time practicing in aaaaaages.

 

[ottozing]

11.714 (0, -4) / (-5, 1) / (-3, -3) / (-3, 0) / (-4, -3) / (6, -3) / (-4, -5) / (-2, 0) / (4, -4) / (0, -2) / (-1, -2)

Parity.... -_-

 

[TDM]

Why not? I want to be fast. I can be fast at CFOP because I don't need to think as much. I do like M-slices like in roux though.

Because there are other methods better than CFOP (Roux and ZZ). You may prefer CFOP now, but other methods are more efficient and are rotationless. One is mostly MUR and the other is LUR. Apart from not needing to think as much, I can't see any advantage of CFOP over Roux or ZZ. If you're fast at Roux and have learned 38 CMLLs, I'd stay using it.

 

[Robert-Y]

444: 30.99, (38.66), (30.92), 31.16, 32.26 => 31.47

 

[Username]

8.99 clock ao100

 

[Iggy]

40.25 4x4 single with PLL parity, 2nd best time ever

 

[TheNextFeliks]

Because there are other methods better than CFOP (Roux and ZZ). You may prefer CFOP now, but other methods are more efficient and are rotationless. One is mostly MUR and the other is LUR. Apart from not needing to think as much, I can't see any advantage of CFOP over Roux or ZZ. If you're fast at Roux and have learned 38 CMLLs, I'd stay using it.

I know. But Roux is hard for me to be fast because of the intuitiveness. But I was just getting sub-20 or pretty close though. And I learned all CMLLs, just haven't updated sig.

 

[AmazingCuber]

After my first two weeks of 4x4:

Single: 1:14.00
Ao5: 1:28.18

 

[TDM]

1:46.60 single in the weekly comp
Also got my PB Ao5 and Ao12 (2:55.23 and 3:22.40)

 

[Nilsibert]

Ah Yeah:

4x4

best time: 59.69
worst time: 1:36.15

current avg5: 1:19.81 (σ = 14.11)
best avg5: 1:19.81 (σ = 14.11)

current avg12: 1:20.92 (σ = 10.97)
best avg12: 1:20.92 (σ = 10.97)

session avg: 1:20.92 (σ = 10.97)
session mean: 1:20.42

 

[Username]

0.90 U' L' U B' U R U L' l r' b u

stackmat pb

E: That's definitely not the scramble, bj qqtimer

Inverse of solution: R U' R' U R u

 

[TDM]

First attempt at red front: 19.71 - only less than a second above average!
E: then 18.33

 

[qqwref]

Because there are other methods better than CFOP (Roux and ZZ). You may prefer CFOP now, but other methods are more efficient and are rotationless.

Get off it. I doubt you've put enough time into all three methods to really understand the pros and cons of each one (for instance, CFOP has advantages other than the raw number of moves and rotations). If anything, Roux and CFOP have roughly equal potential, and honestly, I'm not sure if any ZZ user will ever be able to compete with Feliks or Alex.

 

[Username]

6.55 (1, 2) / (0, -2) / (2, -5) / (0, 0) / (-3) / (-3) / (2) / (6) / (1) / (1) / dddU

First sub7