Accomplishment Thread

[miniGOINGS]

This is getting rediculous... 24 was a pop? Only one counting 12, wow. Please say video, please, please, please.

 

[IamWEB]

Not on video.

But he's filming more soon... HE'S FILMING MORE SOON.

 

[Cride5]

New non-lucky pb: 13.93

Scramble: F2 U F2 U F2 L2 U B2 U2 L U R2 F2 U2 R' B' F L U' (from cTimer)

Reconstruciton:
EOLine: L F U' B L D' (6)
LHB1: U' L' U L' R U2 L U L (9/15)
LHB2: U L U L' (4/19)
RHB1: U R' U2 R' (4/25)
RHB2: U' R' U' R U R' U' (7/32)
Sune: R2 U R' U R U2 R' (7/39)
U-Perm: U' R2 U' R' U' R U RU R U' R (11/50)
~3.6 tps

 

[hellboy17291]

..this is lk wooo....tats quick..

 

[miniGOINGS]

New non-lucky pb: 13.93

Conrad, I searched aaaaaaaall over, but I couldn't find your Lucky PB. Time to update the ol' Wiki profile page, eh?

 

[Cride5]

New non-lucky pb: 13.93

Conrad, I searched aaaaaaaall over, but I couldn't find your Lucky PB. Time to update the ol' Wiki profile page, eh?

Erm well I managed to solve this scramble in 9.50, but it was on the second go so doesn't count. I think the 13.98 is the fastest I've ever done first go.

 

[TMOY]

Is the beginners way, the one from Lars Vandenbergh's site? If not, I just went straight to that method. I also learned my cubeshape straight from Vault's youtube video.

Also, it went something like (1,0) for corners, regular edge swap, then switched 2 corners on top and bottom, then did adjacent-adjacent. Is that lucky?

I know nothing about square-1, ha

Lzrd' site doesn't actually provide a method for solving cubeshape. I haven't seen Vailt's video, but if you do edge grouping, then yes it's beginners way.

Anyway, even when using optimal cubeshape, there are cases where there exists several optimal solutions and you can either get a parity or not depending on which one you choose.

And defining lucky cases is not very easy on Square-1, but I tend to consider adj-adj and opp-opp EPs as lucky, because they are significantly faster than everything else.

 

[richardzhang]

number of times: 100/100
best time: 10.89
worst time: 23.64

current avg5: 14.71 (σ = 0.50)
best avg5: 14.45 (σ = 0.23)

current avg12: 14.86 (σ = 0.62)
best avg12: 14.71 (σ = 0.42)

current avg100: 15.29 (σ = 1.33)
best avg100: 15.29 (σ = 1.33)

session avg: 15.29 (σ = 1.33)
session mean: 15.32

My fingers are hurting really bad right now.

 

[qqwref]

Robert-Y: I don't know, but I let him know about the problem a while back, and while he responded with a possible cause of the error, he still didn't remove the result (or the typing test one that had a similar problem).

BigGreen: wtf insaaaaaane

richardzhang: wow, that's REALLY consistent. avg100 and best avg5 less than a second apart, and 0.42 SD for the avg12? wow.

 

[Tim Major]

number of times: 100/100
best time: 10.89
[snip]
My fingers are hurting really bad right now.

richardzhang: wow, that's REALLY consistent. avg100 and best avg5 less than a second apart, and 0.42 SD for the avg12? wow.

That's what I was thinking, 14.45 a5, and 14.71 a12? If I had a 14.71 a12, I'd probably have a sub 14 a5. Great. Sub 15 soon k? I guess you're sub 15 under pressure, but at home you're slower, basically the opposite of everyone else Good single too.

 

[04mucklowd]

Average of 5: 3.80

Average of 12: 4.44

Nice. Ortega?

Yep with a bit of CLL mixed in there too

 

[04mucklowd]

This is getting... scary

Are there any sub-11 Petrus users out there yet?

Charlie

 

[Toad]

This is getting... scary

Are there any sub-11 Petrus users out there yet?

Charlie

I thought that too haha but then realised she more uses Petrich...

 

[Escher]

Average of 12: 2.93
1. 2.40 R2 U' R' F U2 R2 U' R2
2. 3.29 R2 F2 U F' R2 U F U R2 F'
3. 2.87 F' R U2 F' R' F2 U R U'
4. (2.27) F R' F' U2 F' R2 U
5. 3.42 R U2 F2 U' F' U' R F2 R2
6. 2.77 U2 F2 R' U2 R' U' R2 U R2
7. (4.20) F R U2 F U2 F U R'
8. 3.07 U2 F' U' F U' R U' F R2
9. 2.43 R' F' U2 F2 R' U' F2 R2
10. 2.96 R' F' U2 R2 U' R F U2
11. 3.11 R2 F' U' F U F' U2 R' U'
12. 2.97 R2 U' F2 R F R' F2 U

Possibly the 4th or 5th time sub 3 with Ortega?

 

[Owen]

2x2 single: 1.98

I know, It means nothing.

 

[CubeX]

Crap average for 2x2:

I haven't done 2x2 for ages, since for the Summer Melbourne Open comp. i only got 10.07 fail avg.

5.93, DNF(30.78), 6.71, 5.66, 7.69

Avg. 6.78 sec

 

[amostay2004]

Average of 12: 11.47
1. 12.50 R B L R' B2 R B F' R2 U L' B2 L B R D R D2 F2 U L' U L' F2 B2
2. 13.15 R' U' R2 L' D' U2 L' B R2 B2 F2 D' R B D' L R' U' R2 U B L U2 D R
3. 12.09 B D F' U2 B' U R2 D U B F U F' R' D' B2 U2 L' U2 L' B2 D' L' F' L'
4. 8.61 B2 F' U B D2 U B' L2 D U2 R2 L2 D2 U' L D' U' R' D' B' F2 D' U' R' F2
5. 11.29 B2 U2 F' R' L D' F2 R' D2 B R D2 U R U' F2 D F' L' D2 L' B2 D' R' B2
6. 11.47 D L D L2 D' R2 U2 L' B2 L U' R2 F U D' F B U2 R U2 D2 B2 D' B2 D'
7. 11.43 F' L2 D' F' B' U F L2 D' R2 F2 R' U2 F' U R F U' B D L' F2 R2 D U
8. 12.44 U D2 B L2 B2 L2 U D B' R' D F' R D R2 L B2 L2 B2 L' R' B' R F B'
9. 11.51 D2 U R2 L D' B2 D2 B2 U F' B2 U2 B' L2 D2 F2 D' B2 F' L R F' B R' F
10. (8.49) B U F' B2 L2 U2 R L2 B F2 L2 B U' L B U2 D2 F' L U L' F2 U2 L U
11. (13.21) B2 U2 F2 D2 U F' D B2 U R B' U R D' U2 F2 D' F U' R L2 B' U2 D' R'
12. 10.25 U' D' F2 L D2 U' B L2 R B2 F' D' U2 B' L F' L F' D2 R L2 D2 F' U' B'

lol 2 sub-9s in an avg of 12..first time for me. 8.61 was NL, 8.49 was PLL skip

 

[Yes We Can!]

Achieved yesterday:

7.38 PLL skip with like 0.7 recognition + AUF :/

 

[dada222]

4x4, Rubik's brand, sub-45 average!

Oh BTW, this without knowing any algorithms.

Oh, and that's 45 minutes. I can't imagine doing it in 45 secs. Sometimes it takes me 10 secs just to twist one layer.

Man, I feel your pain. The rubik's 4x4 sucks, even more the 5x5.

 

[dada222]

Unbelievable, I broke my PB by almost 3 seconds! 21.75, PLL skip.