Improvement of over a second in a day, or just out of practice? :p

I saw some of the conversation on StrangePuzzle about random state scrambling for sq-1, noting that both you and I had 19 parities, which I calculate as having a ~6% chance of occurring assuming parity/no parity is 50-50. If random state scrambles were introduced, surely this would affect competition times? Would anything happen about it?
 
Improvement of over a second in a day, or just out of practice? :p

I saw some of the conversation on StrangePuzzle about random state scrambling for sq-1, noting that both you and I had 19 parities, which I calculate as having a ~6% chance of occurring assuming parity/no parity is 50-50. If random state scrambles were introduced, surely this would affect competition times? Would anything happen about it?

Nah, I'm just inconsistent.

Also, yeah. I think the current scrambler is bad, but I'm not sure if changing it is 100% necessary, because it would make the event significantly harder.
 
If it would make the event harder, then it IS necessary - it means the current scrambler is giving easy scrambles (on average), so the scrambler is actually giving people an advantage over an ideal scrambler, which means it needs to be retired as soon as a reasonable random-state scrambler shows up. (If you don't agree, imagine that the current 3x3 scrambler gave 8-move htm scrambles.) Fortunately, making the scrambler harder will not mean that any times have to be erased, although it might make it a bit harder to beat the WR.


Accomplishment: UMC works on this computer, so I went and solved a Teraminx. (In under 45 minutes.)
 
New 3x3x3 PB single = 20.13 sec. Yeah, it was an OLL skip, but I'll take it. PB non-lucky is only about half a sec more. So close to sub-20!!! I'll get one soon.
 
Hai there.

10.78, 9.33, 11.91, 8.72, 9.27, 9.80, 8.06, 11.14, 9.81, 9.41, 9.72, 9.45 = 9.74 average


[14:45] <Faz> 10.78, 9.33, 11.91, 8.72, 9.27, 9.80, 8.06, 11.14, 9.81, 9.41, 9.72, 9.45 = 9.74 average
[14:45] <RanzhaVE> Yes!
[14:45] <RanzhaVE> I got it!
[14:45] <qqwref> wow
[14:45] <qqwref> wat
[14:45] <Jai> -_-
[14:45] <Faz> lol
[14:45] <qqwref> that's ridic
[14:45] <Faz> insane
[14:46] <RanzhaVE> I know.
[14:46] <Faz> i seem to have these sessions
[14:46] <RanzhaVE> INSANITY!
[14:46] <Faz> were
[14:46] <Faz> where
[14:46] <qqwref> so many sub10s
[14:46] <Jai> Faz: how many lucky solves?
[14:46] <Faz> i can see the first pair all the time
[14:46] <Faz> erm
[14:46] <Faz> an oll skip somewhere
[14:46] <Faz> 9.4
[14:46] <RanzhaVE> The 8.06 really helped you.
[14:46] <Faz> i tried to roll the 10
[14:46] <Faz> but got an 11
[14:46] <RanzhaVE> True.
 
Feliks says:
homfg
oooooooooomg
9.75
oooooooooomg
ommgomgomgomgomg

EDIT:

IamTLOS says:
OMG
OMG
OMFG
YES
http://www.speedsolving.com/forum/showthread.php?p=237525&posted=1#post237525
Feliks says:
lol
its 9.88 now
ima see what else i can get
IamTLOS says:
man you are GOD
Feliks says:
9.89
now
i gotta roll out 2 10s
IamTLOS says:
not too hard :P
Feliks says:
yayyayayay
oll skip
9.74 avg now
IamTLOS says:
HISTORY
lol
 
Last edited:
number of times: 101/101
best time: 7.34
worst time: 13.81

current avg5: 10.39 (σ = 1.09)
best avg5: 9.26 (σ = 0.44)

current avg12: 10.53 (σ = 0.91)
best avg12: 9.74 (σ = 0.68)

current avg100: 10.77 (σ = 1.22)
best avg100: 10.77 (σ = 1.22)

session avg: 10.77 (σ = 1.21)
session mean: 10.77

Epic.
 
Statistics for 09-14-2009 15:42:48

Average: 14.61
Standard Deviation: 0.67
Best Time: 13.30
Worst Time: 16.16
Individual Times:
1. 14.52 D2 U L2 U' R F' D' U F2 R B D2 B U L' B L' R2 B L B2 D2 F' L2 B
2. 13.71 F L2 B2 F' L' R F' L R F' D U' R' D2 L2 R2 B L F D2 U B L2 R' F2
3. (16.16) L2 R F' L' U2 L2 R B2 L R F' R' D' L D B U2 L' B F' L2 D2 U' F2 U2
4. 14.79 L B' F' L' R' F' L2 D B2 F2 L2 B' F2 D L2 B L R' F L2 R B' L' R F
5. 14.92 D R2 U L2 U B F2 L R2 B2 U' R' B F L R' B2 F D U F' U B' F' L'
6. 13.46 U2 F L R' U' R B U' L' D R2 D2 U' R2 U' B F2 D' U L F2 D U L2 R
7. 15.88 B F R' D' F2 R2 B' F2 L' F' L2 R' B2 R2 F D' U' R' F L R2 B2 F2 L2 R2
8. 15.24 B' U2 F2 L2 R2 B' L2 F2 L' U2 B' L U2 L' D U2 F R B F' L R U2 L' R
9. 14.50 D' R2 U F' L R' B' F' U L2 R2 D' U2 L' R U' B2 L R B R U' B2 R2 D
10. (13.30) R' D' F' U L U F' R' U2 B2 D2 B' D' U2 F L' F R' B2 D' U' L2 D2 U2 R'
11. 14.27 L D' U2 R2 D U R' D B U2 B F2 L' D2 B R2 F2 D' U2 R2 B D2 U' B F2
12. 14.79 B2 D2 U2 R' D U2 F' U' R2 D' R U' B F' D2 B' F R D' B2 F' L2 R2 U2 F'

Solves 6-10 14.40 :)
Good day for me!
 
number of times: 101/101
best time: 7.34
worst time: 13.81

current avg5: 10.39 (σ = 1.09)
best avg5: 9.26 (σ = 0.44)

current avg12: 10.53 (σ = 0.91)
best avg12: 9.74 (σ = 0.68)

current avg100: 10.77 (σ = 1.22)
best avg100: 10.77 (σ = 1.22)

session avg: 10.77 (σ = 1.21)
session mean: 10.77

Epic.

You suck. Practice more.
;)
 
Copy scramble

The other day I said to myself, "Self, Imma scramble this here cube then see if I can make my other match." So that's what I did.

I realized - as I found myself saying "..umm crap, do I... do another R'? Wait, where was I? ..damnit." - how much I rely on seeing the OLL come together to finish up a couple of my algs. And rather than try to fix that mess I just started over.

...so, it was my first time but it was fun. I didn't time it but basing it on how long it took during a segment of a show that was on I'd say it took about 10-15 minutes (including the redo). (PLL sucked!)

When I finished I was trying to show my wife and neighbor: "Hey! Check this out! Look what I did! ...Hey, look!"

But sadly all I got was: "Yeah yeah dude we see it now STFU we're tryin to watch this show."

:P
 

Attachments

  • 0910092117.jpg
    0910092117.jpg
    26.9 KB · Views: 18
Last edited:
Back
Top