Accomplishment Thread

[BigGreen]

Average: 11.89
Standard Deviation: 1.18
Best Time: 8.82
Worst Time: 14.46
Individual Times:
11.46, 13.40, 11.58, (8.82), 10.56, 12.01, 9.35, 13.35, (14.46), 12.21, 12.68, 12.29

hmmmm needs more sub 10

 

[Gparker]

Average: 11.89
Standard Deviation: 1.18
Best Time: 8.82
Worst Time: 14.46
Individual Times:
11.46, 13.40, 11.58, (8.82), 10.56, 12.01, 9.35, 13.35, (14.46), 12.21, 12.68, 12.29

hmmmm needs more sub 10

Wow! Sub 12 with Roux is pretty impressive. Heck, sub 12 with any method is amazing! Good job!

 

[JustinJ]

Okay, now I would say I'm sub 19

Statistics for 06-15-2009 21:10:11

Cubes Solved: 100/100
Number of Pops: 0
Average: 18.82
Standard Deviation: 2.06
Best Time: 14.61
Worst Time: 25.68

Average: 11.89
Standard Deviation: 1.18
Best Time: 8.82
Worst Time: 14.46
Individual Times:
11.46, 13.40, 11.58, (8.82), 10.56, 12.01, 9.35, 13.35, (14.46), 12.21, 12.68, 12.29

hmmmm needs more sub 10

BigGreen is pro. BigGreen. Is. pro.

 

[Faz]

Update on 7x7: 6:25.37

EDIT: 6:07.00

 

[trying-to-speedcube...]

UWR Mirror Blocks: 33.75

Ehm.. People did sub 30 at competitions in Japan..

check this

That's semi-official

If I look at the Unofficial World Record List, I see the best time is 39.30, and my best time is 33.75. That's a UWR.

 

[Zava]

UWR Mirror Blocks: 33.75

Ehm.. People did sub 30 at competitions in Japan..

check this

That's semi-official

If I look at the Unofficial World Record List, I see the best time is 39.30, and my best time is 33.75. That's a UWR.

no, that's not.

 

[trying-to-speedcube...]

UWR Mirror Blocks: 33.75

Ehm.. People did sub 30 at competitions in Japan..

check this

That's semi-official

If I look at the Unofficial World Record List, I see the best time is 39.30, and my best time is 33.75. That's a UWR.

no, that's not.

Then the times that the Japanese got at those competitions should be contributed to the UWR list too. As they aren't, I don't see them as UWR's.

I know what you mean, but in my opinion, when I'm on that list and there's a 1 to the left of my name, that means I have a UWR.

But if it really isn't, I can always go for the one-handed square-1 multiblind UWR

 

[veazer]

I would like to challenge someone to read this entire thread. Then post said accomplishment on this thread.

 

[qqwref]

Then the times that the Japanese got at those competitions should be contributed to the UWR list too. As they aren't, I don't see them as UWR's.

I know what you mean, but in my opinion, when I'm on that list and there's a 1 to the left of my name, that means I have a UWR.

But if it really isn't, I can always go for the one-handed square-1 multiblind UWR

..........................

The way most people use it, UWR means the best known time, whether in competition or not. You don't really have the UWR unless you have the best time you have ever heard of anyone getting. Just because someone didn't bother to submit does not mean their score is somehow invalid for an *unofficial* ranking.

 

[jcuber]

I don't know how the hell I did this, but:

5x5 single:

1:38.31!

Beating my previous PB by 12 seconds?

Non-lucky, or even easy. Just a great solve!
I'm happy

 

[Berry]

First sub 30 solve 29.86 seconds. It was a lucky solve though so hopefully I will get a non-lucky sub 30 soon.

 

[Faz]

o.O


Cubes Solved: 12/12
Number of Pops: 0
Average: 3.16
Standard Deviation: 1.23
Best Time: 1.89
Worst Time: 6.11
Individual Times:
1. 2.17 F U F2 U2 R F2 U2 F' R2 U2
2. 2.58 R2 U R2 U' F' R U R2 F R
3. 3.34 U2 F2 U' R2 F2 R' F2 U' F R'
4. 3.84 R2 U2 F' R' U' R2 F2 U R F
5. 2.76 U2 F' R U' F U F' R' U' F
6. 1.89 F2 U F2 U2 F' R U R' U R'
7. 2.45 U F2 R' F2 U' R F2 U' F' U'
8. 6.11 R F2 R F2 U' R F' U2 F' R
9. 2.22 U R' F R U R F' R' F' R
10. 3.81 U F2 R U' F' U2 R U2 F R2
11. 4.81 R F R' U F2 U F2 U' R' F
12. 1.98 F' U F' U F2 R U F' R2 F'

And I don't even know full CLL!
Eaaaaaaaaaaaasy scrambles.

PS: on camera

 

[JustinJ]

...

Nice scrambles


3.11, 3.22, (5.84), 3.25, 2.56, 3.11, (2.53), 5.00, 3.05, 4.09, 3.30, 3.50 = 3.55

with a sub 3 RA of 5! 2.91!!!

Craaaazy.

 

[Faz]

Yeah, it was a reaaaally easy set of scrambles.

EDIT: I won't count it as a pb average. After some discussion in IRC, I learnt that the scrambles are 1 move too short to be legal. Maximum 2x2 move count = 11.

 

[jcuber]

Yeah, it was a reaaaally easy set of scrambles.

EDIT: I won't count it as a pb average. After some discussion in IRC, I learnt that the scrambles are 1 move too short to be legal. Maximum 2x2 move count = 11.

Could someone explain this to me, I think it should be "minimum 2x2 move count = 11", right?

 

[Faz]

Maximum number of moves needed to solve a 2x2 is 11.

 

[jcuber]

Maximum number of moves needed to solve a 2x2 is 11.

Oh, now I get it. Still, shouldn't you say "maximum # of moves needed to solve 2x2=11, therefore minimum scramble length = 11?

It will stop alot of n00b questions.

 

[DavidWoner]

Maximum number of moves needed to solve a 2x2 is 11.

But like we told you, WCA uses random state, which is different from random moves. So even if you are using 11 moves scrambles in CCT, it is still insufficient.

Also, I tried them for fun:

(10:24:34 PM) micro501: (notice) DavidWoner's 12 Individual Times: 3.00, 3.08, 3.50, 3.31, 2.55, (1.65), 2.16, 3.59, 2.36, (3.91), 2.91, 2.15
(10:24:34 PM) micro501: (notice) DavidWoner's Average: 2.86, Best Time: 1.65 Worst Time: 3.91

8th was EG:

z' U' R2 U' R'
U2 R' F R2 U' R2' F R' F2 R2 U'

 

[jcuber]

Maximum number of moves needed to solve a 2x2 is 11.

But like we told you, WCA uses random state, which is different from random moves. So even if you are using 11 moves scrambles in CCT, it is still insufficient.

Forgot about that part. Now I'm happy I get it!

 

[JustinJ]

Statistics for 06-16-2009 23:59:04

Cubes Solved: 100/100
Number of Pops: 0
Average: 18.89
Standard Deviation: 1.90
Best Time: 15.00
Worst Time: 23.06

Whew, finished just in time. I'm trying to do an average of 100 per day...