• Welcome to the Speedsolving.com, home of the web's largest puzzle community!
    You are currently viewing our forum as a guest which gives you limited access to join discussions and access our other features.

    Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community of 35,000+ people from around the world today!

    If you are already a member, simply login to hide this message and begin participating in the community!

Nmile7300

Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2019
Messages
351
Location
Arizona
WCA
2019MILE04
I mean, I’m not trying to arouse any suspicion, just a very interesting scramble that I capitalized on. I would never get sub 5, or sub 6 for that matter. I’m sub 9, with 10’s and 11’s
I think what @ProStar is saying is that the chances of that scramble happening are ridiculous which makes this solve seem suspicious. Now here are the things I find suspicious about this solve. Keep in mind that I am not trying to accuse you of cheating, I am just saying that it seems suspicious.

  • The chances of getting a scramble with F2L-1 solved: The chances of this happening are so slim, it makes the solve seem fake. I have never even gotten a cross skip throughout tens of thousands of solves.
  • The time you got: You would think that a sub 9 solver could get better than a 4.98 on a scramble that crazy. I don't know what this means, I'm just saying it is kind of weird.
  • The garbage LL cases: If you did the same solution as me then you got a terrible OLL and an N perm. If you were to set up the scramble, then it makes sense that you would give the scramble bad LL cases so the time seemed more legit. What I mean is that if the LL cases had been better, then you might have gotten a mid 3, which would have seemed suspicious even before we asked for the scramble.
  • Your reaction and calling it "fullstep": It seems kind of weird that your reaction was so chill. If I had gotten that kind of scramble I would have freaked out and posted about it on this thread, my progress thread, and the easy scramble thread. I would have been like "OH MY GOSH I GOT A SCRAMBLE WITH F2L-1 SOLVED WHAT THE HECK!!!!!!" You were just like "Yeah I got a sub 5 solve and it was fullstep" and didn't even give the scramble. Maybe you were hoping that by saying it was fullstep when it clearly wasn't, people would not ask for the scramble. I don't see any other reason that you would say the solve was full step when you knew it was not.

Please don't get mad at me. Again, I am not accusing you of faking solves. I just think the circumstances are a bit fishy. If you actually are faking, I suggest you admit it immediately, there is nothing to be gained by cheating.
 

Zubin Park

Member
Joined
May 27, 2020
Messages
98
I mean I’m not faking my solve, no point in doing so. Obviously the solve wasn’t full step, and my intention wasn’t to pawn it off as a “legit” solve. I mean moments after I posted this @Owen Morrison asked for the scramble, and I was gonna post the scramble anyway. Idk it might’ve been a glitch or something, but when I saw that it was just an f2l insert and LL I wasn’t “excited”, because it wouldnt have counted as real solve anyway. Again, I’m not “mad” at you. Your reasoning is completely justified. Perhaps if maybe you didn’t assume things?
 

Nmile7300

Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2019
Messages
351
Location
Arizona
WCA
2019MILE04
I mean I’m not faking my solve, no point in doing so. Obviously the solve wasn’t full step,
Then why did you say it was?
and my intention wasn’t to pawn it off as a “legit” solve.
Why not? If you got that scramble from cstimer, then it is perfectly legit.

when I saw that it was just an f2l insert and LL I wasn’t “excited”, because it wouldnt have counted as real solve anyway.
Again, why wouldn't it count as a real solve?
 

KW24

Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2020
Messages
27
Location
Germantown WI
I just got a 17.45 3x3 single which is amazing for me and the scramble is very interesting. Heres the scramble and reconstruction.
Scramble: F2 D' L2 D2 U' R2 B2 D2 F2 U' B' R2 U2 B R U F R2 B2 R'
Inspection: Y X'
Cross: F2 R' D' L' D
First Pair: R U' R'
Second Pair: U' R' U2 R2 U' R2 U' R'
Third Pair: U2 L U' L2 U L
Fourth Pair: L U' L' Y' L' U2 l
OLL: U2 R U R' U R U2 R' F R U R" U' F'
AUF: U2
 

Spacey10

Member
Joined
May 11, 2020
Messages
131
I mean I’m not faking my solve, no point in doing so. Obviously the solve wasn’t full step, and my intention wasn’t to pawn it off as a “legit” solve. I mean moments after I posted this @Owen Morrison asked for the scramble, and I was gonna post the scramble anyway. Idk it might’ve been a glitch or something, but when I saw that it was just an f2l insert and LL I wasn’t “excited”, because it wouldnt have counted as real solve anyway. Again, I’m not “mad” at you. Your reasoning is completely justified. Perhaps if maybe you didn’t assume things?
To prove it, can you send a screenshot of your scramble times (the bar in the left with all the solves and avgs) and send another one with the time clicked. That might settle it.
 
Top