Antonie faz fan
Member
3x3 marathon cube relay in 9:40.xy
U R U2 R2 F R F' U2 R' F R F'
A lot of my CMLLs are bad. I've found quite a few algs I intend to switch to, but I don't learn algs very often. I already knew that alg, so I started using it without having to learn a new one.lolwut
A lot of my CMLLs are bad. I've found quite a few algs I intend to switch to, but I don't learn algs very often. I already knew that alg, so I started using it without having to learn a new one.
I can't remember if this was one of the cases with a better alg or not... but that is the same alg as a dot OLL, and dot OLLs are some of the worst OLLs.wait, i use that one, it's not bad, what's better?
Second best single ever:
25. 12.99 D2 R2 U' L2 U B2 D' R2 F2 U' F' D U' F2 R2 B' R D' F' L2
z2 // Inspection
B2 L F2 R' //X-Cross
y U R U2 R' U y L' U' L // F2L#2
L U' L' U2 L U2 L' U L U' L' // F2L#3
y U R U R' U R U R' // F2L#4
F (R U R' U')2 F' // OLL
U' // PLL skip
TPS = 42 / 12.99 = 3.23
EDIT: Whenever I see my own solve reconstructions I cannot help but notice that my F2L doesn't look very efficient. Can somebody point out better insertions (even if that spoils the PLL skip)?
D2 R2 U' L2 U B2 D' R2 F2 U' F' D U' F2 R2 B' R D' F' L2
z2 // Inspection
B2 L F2 R' //X-Cross
U2 R U2 R2 U' R // F2L 2
U R U' R' d R' U R // F2L 3
U2 R U2 R' U2 R U' R' // F2L 4
y R2 F2 R' U2 R' U' R U' R F2 R2 U' // ZBLL
I don't actually know that ZBLL, I looked it up.
Second best single ever:
25. 12.99 D2 R2 U' L2 U B2 D' R2 F2 U' F' D U' F2 R2 B' R D' F' L2
z2 // Inspection
B2 L F2 R' //X-Cross
y U R U2 R' U y L' U' L // F2L#2
L U' L' U2 L U2 L' U L U' L' // F2L#3
y U R U R' U R U R' // F2L#4
F (R U R' U')2 F' // OLL
U' // PLL skip
TPS = 42 / 12.99 = 3.23
EDIT: Whenever I see my own solve reconstructions I cannot help but notice that my F2L doesn't look very efficient. Can somebody point out better insertions (even if that spoils the PLL skip)?
low 26 first sub30 wat
and me :3 (officially)
wait, i use that one, it's not bad, what's better?
EDIT: Whenever I see my own solve reconstructions I cannot help but notice that my F2L doesn't look very efficient. Can somebody point out better insertions (even if that spoils the PLL skip)?
...D2 R2 U' L2 U B2 D' R2 F2 U' F' D U' F2 R2 B' R D' F' L2
z2 // inspection
B2 L F2 R' // cross
y U R U2 R' U y L' U' L // F2L#2 (U2 R U2 R'...R' U' R = U2 R U2 R2' U' R)
L U' L' U2 L U2 L' U L U' L' // F2L#3 (U L U2 L'...U' L U L' = U L U2 L' U' L U L')
y U R U R' U R U R' // F2L#4 (I would do y R U' R' U' R U R' ...not much difference but its 1 move shorter and has fewer regrips, so its faster)
Just generated these two with cube explorer:I like my COLL better than that sledgy-one: F (R U' R' U) (R U2 R' U') (R U R' U') F'. Its just F (whatever that trigger is called) (sexy with U2) (sexy) F'