• Welcome to SpeedSolving.com — the world’s largest puzzle community!

    You’re currently browsing as a guest, which means you have limited access to discussions, resources, member profiles, and community features.

    Join 50,000+ cubers and puzzle enthusiasts from around the world to ask questions, share solves, improve faster, and be part of the community.

    Registration is free, fast, and easy — create your account today.

    Already a member? Log in here to hide this message and start participating.

[Help Thread] 2x2 Discussion

I'm sub 5 with Ortega and consider to change this method to CLL. It's the best idea now or is there any better method then CLL?
CLL is definitely the next step up from Ortega, which is a subset of EG. The "best method" for 2x2 is basically EG and other subsets with one looking. But that's just more algs, not really a whole new method
 
ummm your sig disagrees with that...
My sig is stupid. Deal with it.
Actually it's bcoz at a comp I went to before I started learning CLL (I'm almost done now) I was practicing with a few ppl and one of them new full CLL and one was learning so I always told them Ortega>CLL of course knowing that the opposite was true. Guess who won.
 
I have some questions about 2x2x2:

1) Where I can find 1LLL? It should be only 28 cases
2) Where I can find few moves syrategy or database algortihms? (In the Wiki section I have not found this material)

Thanks
 
Thanks but I hope for an indication about Few Moves strategy for 2x2x2 also. I suspect that to cmplete the first layer and finish with CLL is not the most efficient way...
 
Thanks but I hope for an indication about Few Moves strategy for 2x2x2 also. I suspect that to cmplete the first layer and finish with CLL is not the most efficient way...
The most efficient solutions are not always the fastest because or ergonomics. In addition, many of the methods are really near optimal for many positions. EG is probably the most consistently efficient though it also has many algs.
 
Hi there!
I am not a very good 2x2er who averages about 9 seconds. I was wondering does anyone know of a good website for cll algs?
 
Hi there!
I am not a very good 2x2er who averages about 9 seconds. I was wondering does anyone know of a good website for cll algs?
If you're at 9 seconds average I'm not sure learning CLL is the best you can do. I know that the usual advice is, the sooner you learn the more advanced method the better but you should be able to get sub-5 at least with Ortega / Varasano and with CLL, unless you are able to one-look your solves you're not going to get much faster than that (unless you go all the way to full EG). Just sayin'
 
Back
Top