43.59, 40.28, 36.12 = 40.00 Mo3
E: 40.28, 36.12, 45.92, (57.93+), (35.62) = 40.77 Ao5
E2: 49.66, 39.94, 52.72, (1:06.44), 47.48, 43.59, 40.28, 36.12, 45.92, 57.93+, 35.62, (33.79) = 44.93 Ao12 w/ 39.22 Ao5
E3: oh and 50.89 Ao50 and 52.68 Ao100, just because I'm now linking my PBs in my PB post to when I got them
 
Last edited:
New PB: 00:16.67

Scramble(Up=>Blue, Front=>White): L2 U' F2 U B2 L2 U' B2 R2 D' U2 L F2 D' R' B2 D' L U2

z // Inspection (Up=>Orange, Front=>White)
L2 R' D U R2 L' // EOCross
U R' U R // 1st slot
U2 R U R' // 2nd slot
U' L U' L' // 3rd slot
U L' U L U' L' U' L // 4th slot
U x' R U' R' D R U R' D' x // OCLL
R2 U R U R' U'R' U' R' U R' U' // PLL

I normally average ~32 seconds and my last PB was 00:22.75
 
I just got a PB 3x3 Ao12:
Average of 12: 15.86
1. 15.21 B2 R L' U2 B2 D' B2 F' R' F2 U F2 B2 U2 R U2 F R2 F U' L2 D2 U' R D2
2. 14.90 D B R B L R' B' U F L F D2 R2 B R2 U2 R2 D2 B L B2 R' D' B' U'
3. 15.46 B' D' F U2 R B2 D U' L2 D U B D' F2 L' R F' L2 B D' B' D F' B2 R'
4. 16.03 U2 L2 F' D2 F' R2 B U' B2 U2 R' L U' B' D F2 D L D' U' R2 F' U B' R2
5. (18.56) D2 R' U' B' U2 F' R U' F D L2 F' U' D B2 R U2 R B R L D U2 L U2
6. 16.97 F2 U2 L2 R' F' R' B U' D' B' U2 L' R' B2 F2 R' U R2 U2 D B L' U2 B2 R2
7. (14.46) B D U2 R L2 F2 B2 R' F' R2 F L2 F D2 B U' L2 D' F U B' F2 D2 U L
8. 16.26 F' D2 U R2 L' U2 B L F R' L U R2 D2 F' R L' F2 B L U' L2 D L' D'
9. 16.10 U' L F2 B U R F2 B' L' U' R' D F2 B2 D2 R' U B' U' L F' B2 L2 U2 L'
10. 16.71 F B2 L B R2 B F R' U2 R2 B2 U' L2 F2 R2 B2 L' U2 F B R L F U' R'
11. 14.82 D2 B' L F L2 D2 L' F R2 D L U' L' U' D' F L2 B D R2 B D2 R2 F' B2
12. 16.10 F' D2 L' U D R2 D U F' U L U2 B R D U2 R F2 L U' D2 B' F' U' B
A few years back when I started this was the time range I was aiming for so this is kind of big for me.

EDIT: Well that was one hell of a wall break.
Average of 12: 15.48
1. 14.38 F R2 F B' D2 R' B D' U2 R' U2 B2 D2 F2 D2 L2 D2 B2 U' B D2 L' F L F'
2. (16.26) D F2 B2 U2 D F D2 B L U D F R' L F L2 B U2 R2 L2 D2 B D R B'
3. 15.75 F' B L F2 B' U' R2 L D U B2 F' U L' D' F' D R F' D2 B2 L' B' L' F2
4. 14.46 B D' U' L D2 R L' U2 B D' R B' F' D U' R2 L2 B' U D B D' R' B' D2
5. (13.80) B L U2 F2 L2 B F' D L2 D F' U' F' U L' B' F D2 L' D U2 L' B2 D2 U'
6. 15.65 B F' L' F' R2 F' U2 R2 U2 L R' F' D R D' L2 D F2 L B2 U F2 L F B2
7. 16.11 R' D F' U' R2 F2 B' L' F2 R D2 B' L' R2 F2 R' D2 F2 U D F L R U2 L2
8. 15.53 B2 U' R' D' F D R D2 F2 L2 B' R' D2 F U2 D2 R B2 L' R F U' L' U B
9. 16.07 U D2 B2 U' L R D' F2 B' L' F U F' R2 L F2 B2 L' D2 F' R L2 U F' L
10. 15.26 U' R2 D2 R L' U F B U B' L2 F2 R F R2 D2 B L F' L B' U L2 R2 B2
11. 15.62 U L' B' R' U2 R2 D B2 D' F R B2 U2 D' L2 D' B D U' B D U B2 D2 B'
12. 15.96 L2 U B L2 R2 U' R' F B L' U' D2 R' F2 D' B2 U' B D U2 F2 U R B2 D
 
Last edited:
I'd like to see the diag swap case done under 0.8, Sameer has done it I think, but I've never seen anyone else do it.
Also I was surprised that last one is pure twist U, because that's one is pretty easy... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EouQOxfDRKA
:p

Yeah, I thought I couldnt do that alg so I tried the other ones, now I really like that alg. Diag is just f sexy f' so I think you mean the diag chameleon. That one was a little tough, but I'll film all of them tomorrow.
 
Mean of 3: 34.77
1. 43.53 (-2, -3) / (-1, -1) / (1, -2) / (-4, -1) / (4, -5) / (0, -1) / (-3, 0) / (0, -2) / (5, 0) / (0, -4) / (5, 0) / (-1, -4) /
2. 35.49 (0, 5) / (4, -2) / (-1, -4) / (-3, 0) / (-2, -5) / (-3, 0) / (-4, 0) / (3, 0) / (-5, 0) / (-4, 0) / (4, 0) / (-2, -3) / (6, 0)
3. 25.28 (-5, 0) / (0, 3) / (-3, 0) / (3, -3) / (5, -4) / (3, -3) / (0, -5) / (0, -3) / (-2, 0) / (3, 0) / (6, 0) / (-4, 0) /

E: Mean of 3: 33.32
1. 35.49 (0, 5) / (4, -2) / (-1, -4) / (-3, 0) / (-2, -5) / (-3, 0) / (-4, 0) / (3, 0) / (-5, 0) / (-4, 0) / (4, 0) / (-2, -3) / (6, 0)
2. 25.28 (-5, 0) / (0, 3) / (-3, 0) / (3, -3) / (5, -4) / (3, -3) / (0, -5) / (0, -3) / (-2, 0) / (3, 0) / (6, 0) / (-4, 0) /
3. 39.20 (-5, 0) / (-3, 0) / (3, 0) / (-1, -4) / (-5, -2) / (-3, -3) / (5, 0) / (0, -3) / (4, 0) / (0, -1) / (4, 0) / (0, -4) / (6, 0) /

inb4 I fail the Ao5. About to roll out a 52.84. E2: 1:22.57... yeah... failed EO quite badly. Usually I've done EO by ~20 I think, in this solve it was done ~40, then I got single parity.
 
Last edited:
For me diag T is the hardest. Y-perm isn't as bad, but it's still tricky.

I think Chris uses this for diag: R' U R' F2 R F' U R' F2 R F' R
Although I'm not sure how it compares to R U' R' U' F2 U' R U R' D R2...

That's correct. I tried it and found it faster. I can't sub 1 the second one because I suck at any 2x2 alg with D.
 
1:53.18, (1:32.93), (2:04.00), 1:54.78, 1:54.11 = 1:54.02 pb

5x5... that single though, pb by almost 10 seconds. wat
 
Why would you upload a 9.18 average when you said you were sub 9 in December last year?

We all doubted you, and your proof is a 9.18 average a month later?

I really don't want to argue with you, as I hate the technical arguments on this forum. All I will say is that I uploaded a 8.89 avg12 in early november.

Also, within the avg12 there's a 6.17 and two counting 7s.
 
I really don't want to argue with you, as I hate the technical arguments on this forum. All I will say is that I uploaded a 8.89 avg12 in early november.

Also, within the avg12 there's a 6.17 and two counting 7s.

I believe your times at the moment I guess, but here's what I don't understand: You have a 8.37 avg25. Why the hell would you even considering uploading a sup9 avg12 if you could just do some more solves on cam and eventually get a better avg?
 
I believe your times at the moment I guess, but here's what I don't understand: You have a 8.37 avg25. Why the hell would you even considering uploading a sup9 avg12 if you could just do some more solves on cam and eventually get a better avg?

My bad then. Seemed strange you wanted to upload a 9 average when you have an 8.37 ao25

Maybe I'm alone in this, but I think that an avg25, or even an avg50 says pretty little about your global average. Maybe I'm just mega-inconsistent, but my avg25 and 50 for 2x2-4x4 are vastly different from my global average. For me at least, I don't think that any size average can properly represent global average... 50 is too small, and anything larger is to much to do in one sitting (other than 2x2 I guess).

What do you guys think?
 
Back
Top