Accomplishment Thread

5.52 B2 D2 F' L2 F2 D F2 D F B2 U2 D' L' F L2 B' U' F2 B U D R D2 B2 U

Reconstruction :
y' z2
Xcross : F D L U R' D2
F2Ls : y' L' U L
d' L' U L
U2 R U'2 R' U R U' R'
OLL :U'2 U R' U' R U' R' U R U' R' U2 R (to get skip)
U

34/5.52 = 6.16 TPS
 
uberCuber said:
I did what now o_o

EDIT: Watched the video now. Why'd you do so many parities instead of waiting till last layer to fix the edge?
Click to expand...

It's a bad gamble I take. There's a 50% chance I might not have inner OLL parity, so sometimes I complete edge pairing, in the hope that I'll get a good single.

It's kinda similar to how most people deal with parity on 4x4x4. Let's say we do OLL and delay OLL parity. Then we reach PLL and let's say we also have PLL parity. then we can do an alg which solves both parities at once and we might in fact save time.

Standard approach for someone solving LL: OLL parity, OLL, PLL parity, PLL
Less common approach: OLL, parities, PLL

The latter approach might give us better singles with double parity, but it might also mean that we'll get worse singles in solves with only OLL parity. (Assuming that doing pure OLL parity is slower than non-pure OLL parity).


So in the solve I did, I clearly got to a point where there is obviously one OLL parity, and it's either inner or outer OLL parity (by judging the last two edge groups). Let's say I have outer OLL parity (but I obviously don't know this). Then I complete edge pairing by doing a L2T parity alg. Followed by F2L, OLL, PLL parity if any, then PLL.

But with the standard approach, then I would have solved just one of the last two edge groups and it would mean that I would have to do outer OLL parity later on in the solve. Which is arguably slower.

So really I guess it's a case of whether you want A (standard appproach) or B (non stanard approach) when we reach a stage in edge pairing where there's obviously only one OLL parity.

Inner parity: A: solve penultimate edge group in 1 simple alg, do inner OLL parity after F5L, B: solve last two edge groups with L2T parity alg, but also do fat OLL parity alg after F5L.
Outer parity: A: solve penultimate edge group in 1 simple alg, do outer OLL parity after F5L, B: solve last two edge groups with L2T parity alg, but no more OLL parity.

EDIT: after reading this, I'm not really sure which approach I like more...
 
2x2wtf

stats: (hide)
number of times: 100/101
best time: 1.369
worst time: 3.912

current avg5: 2.255 (σ = 0.29)
best avg5: 1.807 (σ = 0.30)

current avg12: 2.513 (σ = 0.47)
best avg12: 1.986 (σ = 0.29)

current avg50: 2.390 (σ = 0.49)
best avg50: 2.268 (σ = 0.54)

current avg100: 2.334 (σ = 0.53)
best avg100: 2.331 (σ = 0.52)

session avg: 2.331 (σ = 0.50)
session mean: 2.351

PB ao100 by .09 O____o

Session average: 2.331
1. 2.545 F' U F2 U F' U2 F' R F2
2. 2.692 F2 U' F' U F2 R' F2 R' F U'
3. 2.031 U2 F2 R U' F' R U2 R U
4. (1.475) R2 U' R F2 R F' U2 F U2
5. 2.407 R' F' U R2 U F2 U R' U2
6. 1.858 F2 U2 R U R2 U F2 R2 U2
7. 1.920 R U F' R' U F2 R' U F' U'
8. 1.939 F' R U' F2 R U R' F U'
9. 3.069 F R U' R2 F' R U2 R' U'
10. 1.628 F' R2 F2 U2 F' R2 U' R2 U'
11. 2.584 R F U R' F2 R2 U2 F' U'
12. 2.211 F U' F U F2 R' U2 R U
13. 2.206 U2 R' U2 F' U' R F2 R' U2
14. 2.355 F R F2 R' U F2 U' R2 F U'
15. 2.470 U2 F R2 U2 F R' F U' R U'
16. (1.369) R2 U' R U R2 U F' R U2
17. 1.767 U F U2 F U' R' F R2 U'
18. 2.584 F R2 F2 U' F' U' R' F2 R'
19. 2.317 R2 U' F2 R2 F' R' U F' U'
20. (1.381) F U R2 F' U' F2 U R U2
21. (DNF(1.489)) R2 F' R U2 R' F R' F' R2
22. 1.573 U2 F2 U R' U R2 U2 R2 U'
23. 1.839 R' U2 R U' R2 F2 U' F U'
24. (3.845) U R F' U2 R2 F' U F U2
25. (1.501) R F' U' F U R' U R2 U'
26. 2.153 F' R2 F2 R2 U F' U2 R2 U'
27. 1.680 R' F' U R U R U' F U'
28. (3.611) R' F U2 R2 U' R F2 R U'
29. 1.587 F2 R F' R F2 U2 R' F' R
30. 2.190 F2 U F' R U' R' F2 U' F2 U2
31. 2.466 F R F' R' F2 U2 F' R U
32. (3.912) F2 U' F U R2 F' R' U' R' U'
33. 2.005 R2 F2 U2 R' U2 R' U' R U2
34. 2.079 U2 F2 U' F R' F2 U' F R U'
35. 2.131 U R F U2 R F2 R U' F2 U'
36. 1.695 U2 F R2 U2 F U R2 F' R
37. 2.008 U R F2 U F2 U' R U R'
38. (3.904) U' R' F' U' F2 R2 F' R2 F2 U'
39. 3.061 F' U2 F' R F U' F2 R' U2
40. 1.684 U' F U' F R' F2 U R2 U
41. 1.918 R U' F' R' F2 R U2 F' U'
42. 2.034 F U R' U' R' F2 U F2 R'
43. 2.127 F R F R2 U2 R' U2 F2 U2
44. 3.424 R' F2 U2 R2 U2 R' U' R2 U
45. 2.875 R' U2 F' R2 F R F2 R2 U
46. 2.188 R' U F R' U F2 R2 U R2
47. 2.519 F2 U2 F' R U' F R2 U' R
48. 2.280 R2 F U F2 U F' U' R' F
49. 1.854 U' F U' R' F U' F U R2 U'
50. 2.868 F2 U' F' R' F R' F2 R' U2
51. 2.812 F2 U2 R' F U' R2 U' F R'
52. 3.456 U F2 U' R2 F2 R' U2 F2 U'
53. 2.379 U2 F2 U R F U2 F U2 F
54. 1.970 U2 R2 F U2 F' R' F R' F2
55. 3.594 R F U' R2 F U' R U' R2
56. 3.146 U' F2 R2 U R F R2 F2 R' U2
57. 2.423 U2 F U' F R2 U' F' U' R2 U'
58. 2.018 U2 R U2 R' U2 F U' F' R'
59. 1.653 R U2 F' U F2 U F U R'
60. 2.004 R2 F2 U2 R U' F' R' F' U'
61. 3.363 F' U F R' U2 F2 R F' U'
62. 2.412 U2 R2 F2 R F U2 R' F2 U2
63. 2.774 U' F' U2 R' F2 R' F2 R U2
64. 2.386 U2 F U F' U R2 U R2 U'
65. 1.813 R' F' R' F2 U' R U F' U'
66. 2.458 R U R' F' R F' U F' U2
67. 2.282 F2 U R F2 U2 R2 U' F R
68. 2.518 F' R2 F' U' R2 U' R' U2 R2
69. 1.905 R2 U' R U R2 U R' F' R U'
70. 3.400 F2 U R F' R U' R' U2 R'
71. 2.850 F' R2 F R2 F' R U' F2 U'
72. 1.868 R' F R F' U' F2 R U2 R
73. (1.434) R2 F' U' R' U F2 R2 U' R
74. 1.905 U' F U' R' F U2 R' F R'
75. 2.103 U F' U R2 U' F R' F2 U
76. 1.904 U' R U R F' U' F U2 R2
77. 1.890 F' U F' R F2 R' F2 U2 R2
78. 1.902 F R' U F2 R' U F U R U2
79. 3.297 R2 U2 R U' F2 U2 R F2 U'
80. 2.496 R' F' U F2 R' U R2 F' U'
81. (1.522) F2 U2 R' U2 F' U' F' R2 U'
82. 2.191 F2 R' F2 U F R' F R2 U
83. 2.292 R' F' R F' R F' U' F2 R2 U'
84. 1.655 F R F U2 R' F U R U2
85. 1.730 U2 R' U' R2 F' U F2 R2 U'
86. 2.506 F2 R2 U R U2 R' F2 R' U'
87. 2.634 R F U2 F R2 U2 F' R' U'
88. 3.191 R F' U F' R2 F' U' R2 U
89. 2.612 R' U F U2 F R2 F2 U' R' U'
90. 2.712 R U' F' U2 R F U R F2
91. 3.473 U F2 U2 R2 F' R' F R' F2
92. 2.372 R' F' R F R F2 U R' U2
93. 2.400 U' F' R' U2 F2 U' F2 U R'
94. 1.832 U F2 R U F2 R F2 R U
95. (3.608) R2 U2 R' F2 R' U' R2 F' U2
96. 2.752 R' U2 R U2 F' R' U2 R F'
97. 2.143 U2 F2 U F R2 F' R F2 U'
98. 2.587 U F2 R2 F' U' F2 U' F R U'
99. 2.035 R2 U' F2 R F2 R' F2 R U'
100. 1.762 U2 F2 U' F' U2 F U2 R' U'
101. 2.821 R2 F U' F R2 U2 F U' F2 U'

30 sub 2 singles :tu
 
best time: 3.79
worst time: 10.64

current avg5: 5.70 (σ = 0.12)
best avg5: 4.61 (σ = 0.20)

current avg12: 5.88 (σ = 0.98)
best avg12: 4.92 (σ = 0.76)

current avg100: 5.66 (σ = 0.91)
best avg100: 5.66 (σ = 0.91)

session avg: 5.66 (σ = 0.91)
session mean: 5.75

ao100 PB by 0.01

I'm now faster with 1-flip than what I was before learning it :D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Turns_And_Twists2024
PNW accomplishment / upcoming comps thread
Replies
9
Views
1,773
Turns_And_Twists2024
Turns_And_Twists2024
Americancuber232
  • Poll Poll
Accomplishment thread.
Replies
4
Views
1,412
FenTheGoat
FenTheGoat
BenChristman1
CSTimer Virtual Cube Discussion and Accomplishment Thread
3 4 5
Replies
81
Views
21,949
Cubing_Grandson
Cubing_Grandson
I
  • Poll Poll
Accomplishment Thread vs Accomplishment Subforum
Replies
15
Views
4,441
goodatthis
G
Cubenovice
Kids Accomplishment Thread
8 9 10
Replies
191
Views
38,466
Sub 20 Cuber
Sub 20 Cuber
Back
Top