Accomplishment Thread

[gbcuber]

10.88 NL 3x3 solve Easy OLL and U perm, but I lost the scramble

 

[Sebastien]

8.18, 7.58, 8.06, 7.66, (9.32), 8.67, (7.09), 8.12, 8.41, 7.75, 7.96, 7.12 = 7.95
What the hell just happened O_o

Haha, nothing. You're the world champion so nowadays doing sub8 of 12 is just reasonable!

Congratz btw!

 

[GearGuy57]

I finally got sub-minute

 

[JackJ]

High 16 avg 5 on sim. Wat.

 

[tasguitar7]

first sub-30 avg of 5 and 26.68 pb single today

 

[Florian]

Finally sub-1:20
1. 1:17.41 L' F2 f2 B2 R2 F u2 R U' L2 D r u' l b U' d' u2 D l' R L' U' u2 B2 b D u B' F r U' d2 F d R' L l2 u' D' U2 l' r' D d' L R' B2 L2 U2 L' R2 D' U2 L' U' B D B' U

My aim is to get sub-1:20 next comp

 

[RCTACameron]

11.46, (9.03), (12.50), 11.34, 11.27 = 11.36 3x3 average of 5 PB.
12.11, 12.69, 15.90, 11.46, (9.03), 12.50, 11.34, 11.27, 11.71, 12.40, (16.71+), 13.34 = 12.47 average of 12 (PB is 12.45.) I was hoping for sub-12, but I got a counting 15.

 

[ben1996123]

93% on (practice) C1 exam.

57/61

2 marks lost on Q7c: Prove that f(x) = 0 has real roots where f(x) = something that I can't remember.

2 marks lost on Q9a: I wrote that 98 + 4 = 100 :fp LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Q9a was find \( \sum_{n=0}^{50}2n \)

 

[Specs112]

2 marks lost on Q9a: I wrote that 98 + 4 = 100 :fp LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You could do worse.

My class was doing stuff earlier this year with trig identities (pretty much we were reviewing last year because everyone forgets all the things)... we had to prove something, I forget what it was.

The point is that I used all the identities properly and then, after reducing it to basic arithmetic, I f***ed up 1+1. And yes, this was on an exam and I didn't catch my mistake.

:fp:fp:fp:fp:fp:fp:fp:fp

 

[ben1996123]

You could do worse.

My class was doing stuff earlier this year with trig identities (pretty much we were reviewing last year because everyone forgets all the things)... we had to prove something, I forget what it was.

The point is that I used all the identities properly and then, after reducing it to basic arithmetic, I f***ed up 1+1. And yes, this was on an exam and I didn't catch my mistake.

*facepalms*

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

that sucks D:

 

[ben1996123]

4x4 47.25 double parity D:

 

[Evan Liu]

3:17.41 6x6 single PB (OLL Parity)

 

[tozies24]

13.20, 12.92, (12.71), (18.49), 12.79 ==>> 12.97 ao5. first sub 13. inside of a 14.41 ao12 also pb.

 

[qqwref]

1:17.25 real5x5 single. lolwut

 

[Carrot]

(1.84), 5.77, 7.8, 8.56, 4.56, 6.46, 7.66, 7.28, (10.16), 5.18, 6.47, 7.19 => 6.69 avg12 skewb

I know 3 algs so far, I'm thinking about learn one more soon (that would be H-perm)

the 1.84 was: U R L which I had a major lockup in :fp

 

[Robert-Y]

555:

Best average of 5: 1:12.82
6-10 - 1:11.51 1:14.02 (1:23.90) (1:09.27) 1:12.94

I'm still using my (undocumented >_>) edge pairing method

 

[Daniel Wu]

Best Average of 5: 3.46
σ: 1.49
Best Time: 1.02
Worst Time: 3.99
Individual Times:
3.67, (1.02), (3.99), 2.96, 3.76

1. 3.67 B L U B L U' L' u' b'
2. (1.02) L' U B R L' B U' u r l'
3. (3.99) U B' L' R' L B U' B u' r' b
4. 2.96 U B' U' B' U R' B' U L' r'
5. 3.76 U' B' R' B R' B' R' L u r' b

 

[Hershey]

I'm still using my (undocumented >_>) edge pairing method

Will you document it anytime soon?

 

[Robert-Y]

Maybe. I might do it tomorrow.The thing is, freeslicing is so good (just look at faz's results), so it seems like my method can't compete with it right now. People will probably be better off using freeslicing.

(But then why don't I switch? Because I'm lazy and I want to see how fast I can get with my current edge pairing method )

 

[Zane_C]

Megaminx:

3:42.60, 3:02.85, 2:50.31, (4:05.23), (2:36.98) = 3:11.92 avg5
3:37.54, 3:23.76, 3:38.64, 3:30.40, 3:42.60, 3:02.85, 2:50.31, (4:05.23), (2:36.98), 3:44.09, 3:50.15, 3:29.11 = 3:28.94 avg12