~Adam~
Legend
The conical structure and corner design are the issues.
You say that as if you know it's fact. Do you know something that we don't? Or am I reading too far into your sentence structure?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The conical structure and corner design are the issues.
Many people are not signing the petition because of respect. They respect him because he invented good bigger cubes, and I do respect that. But you see with the takedown of guhong he is ruining the community. Yes, the pieces might be similar to that on the patent, but as far as I see v-cube has no intentions to make a v3. The guhong is a revolutionary cube, and it's design is the best the community has seen. If v-cube makes 3x3 then the cubing community would be happy seeing as though his cubes are of amazing quality. But if v-cube has no plans of making 3x3's, what's the point of taking good ones off the market?
It's nice for us speedcubers that even cubes which might be technically illegal to own and sell can still be allowed in competition. I doubt the GuHong will get to that point, but if it does a little black market in cubing may well develop.
Please everyone be patient until further information is revealed either from V-cubes, or a spokesperson for V-cubes. I can assure you that the matter is being looked into.
Chris, I sent you a PM on this topic. Can you let me know if you received it? Thanks.
How many twisty puzzle online stores don't stock any KOs?There already is a huge black market for cubes; a pretty good amount of puzzles sold on sites like popbuying, lighttake, and a bunch of these other sites are pretty blatantly illegal.
2
V cubes
Rubiks
Not as if it is any surprise, but I asked Pantazis in a PM several times to point out the similarities. I also asked him to show the video. All I got was how I seem to not understand what he's saying and that a lawyer would have to explain it to me. I asked several times for the video (as did Stefan) and he still avoided it in a PM. He also mentioned how that this will be decided by a judge if (and yes, he said if) it goes to court. He argued in the PM very much like he did in this thread (as such bringing up points from this thread that I didn't bring up, etc).
He said he mentioned several times (which he didn't, the same PM where he mentioned this, is the only one) about the "conical" shape of the pieces in the video if you zoom in on something, then zoom out of something else (didn't provide images, or even times in the video to specify which pieces, nor did he even say a corner or edge), then it looks similar to the V-Cube 3 Patent (which he didn't specify to which part of that patent either). I asked for images to better detail it, and he said he couldn't get me any (I asked specifically of the GuHong pieces). If he was talking about the video that izovire gave us, the video mentions the corner stems being similar, not any sort of conical shape, unless I missed something.
I'm sure he has got it. Unless your suggesting a possible malfunction in software that costs (last I remember) around 100 dollars for each license. vBulletin malfunctioning in only your PM to him seems very unlikely so I fail to see the reason for you to post this question in the thread.
2
V cubes
Rubiks
Didn't C4Y release the 1st Gigaminx not so long ago?even mefferts has knockoffs?
Are you done?
Well, unlike some other people, I am not sarcastic. Sarcastic talk is not my style and it will never be.
So in return of my seasonal wishes, I got more sarcasm, more personal attacks, more insults.
Mefferts >.<
Mefferts is known to have stocked KO items. They even almost stocked KO 7x7s before people outraged.