14.65 avg5

14.46 D' U' R' D L' U2 F D' L2 R2 F' L R' D' L U F L F U F D' B D2 L2
14.47 D U L D' B2 U' L2 D' B2 L2 R2 D' F' D F D' U' B2 F U2 L R' B' F' L
(21.61) B2 F' U2 B' U2 L2 R2 B' F' U B L' R' U F L2 R' D R' U L R B' L B
15.03 D' L R B' F2 U2 B2 F' R' B2 F2 D' U' L' B' F2 D' L2 D U2 B2 D' R2 B2 F'
(12.41) D L2 B' D' B' F L2 R' B' F L R' F2 D L' R F U' R' U2 L R2 U2 L2 B

Scrambles seemed to have easy cross/f2l's if you solve the cross on the bottom. I think only the 12 was a skip (OLL). PB by .04 seconds.
 
Did my second attempt at the 20x20x20 on Gabbasoft today:
One session, 6 h 48 mins 33.55 sec, 8764 moves

I guess it's time to change my signature and start with the supercube version of this :)
 
5th post by me this hour

3. learned "parity" alg for 2X2 1min av
(I deleted the name by accident) said:
are you serious?

ahaha :D that was when i wasn't serious, with a horrible 2X2! (4 months ago)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gEvImkE6YVI
now i average 10secs with an eastsheen 2X2 using ortega, any advice for going to sub 6 would be very appreciated! ;) (don't give help on this thread, I'll repost this in the 1AQT!):o

I don't think he was concerned about your average. He was asking if you were serious about a 2x2 parity alg.

The question is: Should the Y and the J perm on the 2x2 be known as parity cases?
 
5th post by me this hour

3. learned "parity" alg for 2X2 1min av
(I deleted the name by accident) said:
are you serious?

ahaha :D that was when i wasn't serious, with a horrible 2X2! (4 months ago)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gEvImkE6YVI
now i average 10secs with an eastsheen 2X2 using ortega, any advice for going to sub 6 would be very appreciated! ;) (don't give help on this thread, I'll repost this in the 1AQT!):o

I don't think he was concerned about your average. He was asking if you were serious about a 2x2 parity alg.

The question is: Should the Y and the J perm on the 2x2 be known as parity cases?

Oh okay, darn! J perm and Y perm shouldn't really be considered one, It's just a very strange case because it's corners only. At that time, I didn't know about PLL!
I used
1. first layer using corner inserts
2. permutation of corners
3. orientation using sexy move at another angle (makes it bad)
it was basically the dan brown method applied to 2X2
the "parity" alg at that time was (with bar at front) L' U L U F U' F'
and for anything else i would just use U R U' L' U R' U' L
DAN BROWN'S METHOD SUCKS, ORTEGA IS THE NEW METHOD :D:D
(except for the megaminx)
 
5th post by me this hour

3. learned "parity" alg for 2X2 1min av
(I deleted the name by accident) said:
are you serious?

ahaha :D that was when i wasn't serious, with a horrible 2X2! (4 months ago)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gEvImkE6YVI
now i average 10secs with an eastsheen 2X2 using ortega, any advice for going to sub 6 would be very appreciated! ;) (don't give help on this thread, I'll repost this in the 1AQT!):o

I don't think he was concerned about your average. He was asking if you were serious about a 2x2 parity alg.

The question is: Should the Y and the J perm on the 2x2 be known as parity cases?

Oh okay, darn! J perm and Y perm shouldn't really be considered one, It's just a very strange case because it's corners only. At that time, I didn't know about PLL!
I used
1. first layer using corner inserts
2. permutation of corners
3. orientation using sexy move at another angle (makes it bad)
it was basically the dan brown method applied to 2X2
the "parity" alg at that time was (with bar at front) L' U L U F U' F'
and for anything else i would just use U R U' L' U R' U' L
DAN BROWN'S METHOD SUCKS, ORTEGA IS THE NEW METHOD :D:D
(except for the megaminx)

CLL :D
 
5th post by me this hour

3. learned "parity" alg for 2X2 1min av
(I deleted the name by accident) said:
are you serious?

ahaha :D that was when i wasn't serious, with a horrible 2X2! (4 months ago)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gEvImkE6YVI
now i average 10secs with an eastsheen 2X2 using ortega, any advice for going to sub 6 would be very appreciated! ;) (don't give help on this thread, I'll repost this in the 1AQT!):o

I don't think he was concerned about your average. He was asking if you were serious about a 2x2 parity alg.

The question is: Should the Y and the J perm on the 2x2 be known as parity cases?

Oh okay, darn! J perm and Y perm shouldn't really be considered one, It's just a very strange case because it's corners only. At that time, I didn't know about PLL!
I used
1. first layer using corner inserts
2. permutation of corners
3. orientation using sexy move at another angle (makes it bad)
it was basically the dan brown method applied to 2X2
the "parity" alg at that time was (with bar at front) L' U L U F U' F'
and for anything else i would just use U R U' L' U R' U' L
DAN BROWN'S METHOD SUCKS, ORTEGA IS THE NEW METHOD :D:D
(except for the megaminx)

CLL :D

yeah EG! lol jk :)
 
14.43 PB Avg of 12- 14.42, 14.23, (19.71), 12.82, 15.07, 15.22, 14.67, 15.12, 14.78, 13.33, 14.64, (12.63)

I am now officially sub 30 (except when I do really bad solves in which they hover around 35)

That makes me sub 30 right? I only get bad solves...every once in a while :-/

A lot of people like to say that if you have a sub 30 average of 100, you're sub 30, but it's a pretty subjective term, so it's up to you.
 
Average of 5: 22.21
1. (27.50) F2 L F2 U F' R' F2 B2 U2 B L' R' F2 R' F' L' D' U' B R2 U B2 U R' B2
2. 22.33 D2 U F' R B' D2 B' L2 F2 L D B R2 D' B U2 F' U2 R U' D' B' R2 F2 D
3. 22.05 F' D L F2 L U D F2 D B2 U' F2 R U2 F2 L2 D2 B U2 B R2 F U B D
4. 22.27 U R2 D' L2 F2 D L2 B D L B D' U' F2 R B' L B2 D' B2 U2 R B2 U2 D'
5. (21.48) U2 R U R2 B' F' R2 U R' U' F' L R U2 L' U' B2 D' B2 F' L2 R2 U B' D

Left hand
 
Not that anyone would really care but I finally got a sub 20 average of 5!

Actually, I got 2 in one day so it was not just lucky! I seemed to get a lot of 20.xx averages but finally tipped the scales!
 
Back
Top